Hapbee Technologies, Inc.
Hapbee Technologies, Inc. (HAPBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HAPBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPBF | $0.07 | -0.87% | 14.4M | -3.42 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SSNLF | $40.60 | +0.00% | 265.3B | 8.44 | $4.81 | +2.54% |
| XIACY | $33.76 | -2.79% | 181.2B | 53.11 | $0.65 | N/A |
| XIACF | $6.85 | -2.00% | 179.5B | 53.23 | $0.13 | N/A |
| SNEJF | $25.50 | -0.38% | 150.8B | 19.55 | $1.28 | +0.56% |
| PCRFF | $9.58 | -2.25% | 23B | 9.29 | $1.06 | +3.30% |
| PCRFY | $9.36 | -1.27% | 21.8B | 6.59 | $1.42 | N/A |
| KYOCF | $11.95 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 99.58 | $0.12 | +2.84% |
| KYOCY | $11.81 | +6.16% | 16.1B | 95.00 | $0.12 | +0.55% |
| TCLHF | $1.50 | +35.14% | 3.8B | 16.67 | $0.09 | +3.68% |
Stock Comparison
HAPBF vs SSNLF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, SSNLF has a market cap of 265.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while SSNLF trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas SSNLF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to SSNLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SSNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check SSNLF's competition here
HAPBF vs XIACY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, XIACY has a market cap of 181.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while XIACY trades at $33.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas XIACY's P/E ratio is 53.11. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to XIACY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to XIACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check XIACY's competition here
HAPBF vs XIACF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, XIACF has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while XIACF trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas XIACF's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to XIACF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to XIACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check XIACF's competition here
HAPBF vs SNEJF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, SNEJF has a market cap of 150.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while SNEJF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas SNEJF's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to SNEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to SNEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check SNEJF's competition here
HAPBF vs PCRFF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, PCRFF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while PCRFF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas PCRFF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to PCRFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to PCRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check PCRFF's competition here
HAPBF vs PCRFY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, PCRFY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while PCRFY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas PCRFY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to PCRFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to PCRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check PCRFY's competition here
HAPBF vs KYOCF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, KYOCF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while KYOCF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas KYOCF's P/E ratio is 99.58. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to KYOCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to KYOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check KYOCF's competition here
HAPBF vs KYOCY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, KYOCY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while KYOCY trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas KYOCY's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to KYOCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to KYOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check KYOCY's competition here
HAPBF vs TCLHF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, TCLHF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while TCLHF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas TCLHF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to TCLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to TCLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check TCLHF's competition here
HAPBF vs SHCAF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, SHCAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while SHCAF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas SHCAF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to SHCAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SHCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check SHCAF's competition here
HAPBF vs SHCAY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, SHCAY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while SHCAY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas SHCAY's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to SHCAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to SHCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check SHCAY's competition here
HAPBF vs CSIOF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, CSIOF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while CSIOF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas CSIOF's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to CSIOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to CSIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check CSIOF's competition here
HAPBF vs CSIOY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, CSIOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while CSIOY trades at $81.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas CSIOY's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to CSIOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to CSIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check CSIOY's competition here
HAPBF vs JVCZY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, JVCZY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while JVCZY trades at $46.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas JVCZY's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to JVCZY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to JVCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check JVCZY's competition here
HAPBF vs AITUY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, AITUY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while AITUY trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas AITUY's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to AITUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to AITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check AITUY's competition here
HAPBF vs SWDHY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, SWDHY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while SWDHY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas SWDHY's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to SWDHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SWDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check SWDHY's competition here
HAPBF vs SNCPF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, SNCPF has a market cap of 957.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while SNCPF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas SNCPF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to SNCPF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SNCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check SNCPF's competition here
HAPBF vs SWDHF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, SWDHF has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while SWDHF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas SWDHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to SWDHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to SWDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check SWDHF's competition here
HAPBF vs BGOUF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, BGOUF has a market cap of 313.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while BGOUF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas BGOUF's P/E ratio is -72.33. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to BGOUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to BGOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check BGOUF's competition here
HAPBF vs ADPXY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, ADPXY has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while ADPXY trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas ADPXY's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to ADPXY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to ADPXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check ADPXY's competition here
HAPBF vs VTEPF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, VTEPF has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while VTEPF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas VTEPF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to VTEPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to VTEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check VTEPF's competition here
HAPBF vs CHWTF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, CHWTF has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while CHWTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas CHWTF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to CHWTF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to CHWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check CHWTF's competition here
HAPBF vs DBOXF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, DBOXF has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while DBOXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas DBOXF's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to DBOXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to DBOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check DBOXF's competition here
HAPBF vs HLOC Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, HLOC has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while HLOC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas HLOC's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to HLOC's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to HLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check HLOC's competition here
HAPBF vs AMOSF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, AMOSF has a market cap of 47.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while AMOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas AMOSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to AMOSF's ROE of -8.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to AMOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check AMOSF's competition here
HAPBF vs NUHRF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, NUHRF has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while NUHRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas NUHRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to NUHRF's ROE of -3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to NUHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check NUHRF's competition here
HAPBF vs GAXY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, GAXY has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while GAXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas GAXY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to GAXY's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to GAXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check GAXY's competition here
HAPBF vs COLCF Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, COLCF has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while COLCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas COLCF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to COLCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to COLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check COLCF's competition here
HAPBF vs ANDR Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, ANDR has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while ANDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas ANDR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to ANDR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to ANDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check ANDR's competition here
HAPBF vs BZIC Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, BZIC has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while BZIC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas BZIC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to BZIC's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to BZIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check BZIC's competition here
HAPBF vs NGEY Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, NGEY has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while NGEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas NGEY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to NGEY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to NGEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check NGEY's competition here
HAPBF vs PUMD Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, PUMD has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while PUMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas PUMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to PUMD's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to PUMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check PUMD's competition here
HAPBF vs CTXV Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, CTXV has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while CTXV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas CTXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to CTXV's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to CTXV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check CTXV's competition here
HAPBF vs ZVTK Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, ZVTK has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while ZVTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas ZVTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to ZVTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to ZVTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check ZVTK's competition here
HAPBF vs GAXYQ Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, GAXYQ has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while GAXYQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas GAXYQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to GAXYQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to GAXYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check GAXYQ's competition here
HAPBF vs LTEC Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, LTEC has a market cap of 486. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while LTEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas LTEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to LTEC's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to LTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check LTEC's competition here
HAPBF vs CYRD Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, CYRD has a market cap of 343. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while CYRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas CYRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to CYRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to CYRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check CYRD's competition here
HAPBF vs NYXO Comparison July 2025
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.4M. In comparison, NYXO has a market cap of 242. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.07, while NYXO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.42, whereas NYXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.02%, compared to NYXO's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to NYXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.Check NYXO's competition here