Hapbee Technologies, Inc.
Hapbee Technologies, Inc. HAPBF Peers
See (HAPBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPBF | $0.08 | -6.25% | 14.34M | -3.75 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SSNLF | $40.60 | N/A | 266.40B | 8.44 | $4.81 | +1.32% |
| XIACY | $33.62 | +3.45% | 175.17B | 51.72 | $0.65 | N/A |
| XIACF | $6.74 | +2.74% | 174.87B | 51.85 | $0.13 | N/A |
| SNEJF | $24.61 | -4.25% | 148.28B | 19.38 | $1.27 | +0.01% |
| SWDHY | $11.00 | +3.38% | 26.93B | 10.78 | $1.02 | +1.75% |
| PCRFF | $10.30 | -10.43% | 24.05B | 7.98 | $1.29 | +3.15% |
| PCRFY | $9.36 | -1.27% | 21.85B | 6.59 | $1.42 | N/A |
| KYOCY | $12.44 | +0.16% | 17.52B | 103.67 | $0.12 | +0.27% |
| KYOCF | $12.19 | N/A | 17.17B | 101.58 | $0.12 | +2.78% |
Stock Comparison
HAPBF vs SSNLF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, SSNLF has a market cap of 266.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while SSNLF trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas SSNLF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to SSNLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SSNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs XIACY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, XIACY has a market cap of 175.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while XIACY trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas XIACY's P/E ratio is 51.72. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to XIACY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to XIACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs XIACF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, XIACF has a market cap of 174.87B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while XIACF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas XIACF's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to XIACF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to XIACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs SNEJF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, SNEJF has a market cap of 148.28B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while SNEJF trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas SNEJF's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to SNEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SNEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs SWDHY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, SWDHY has a market cap of 26.93B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while SWDHY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas SWDHY's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to SWDHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to SWDHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs PCRFF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, PCRFF has a market cap of 24.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while PCRFF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas PCRFF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to PCRFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to PCRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs PCRFY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, PCRFY has a market cap of 21.85B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while PCRFY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas PCRFY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to PCRFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to PCRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs KYOCY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, KYOCY has a market cap of 17.52B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while KYOCY trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas KYOCY's P/E ratio is 103.67. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to KYOCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to KYOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs KYOCF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, KYOCF has a market cap of 17.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while KYOCF trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas KYOCF's P/E ratio is 101.58. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to KYOCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to KYOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs JVCZY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, JVCZY has a market cap of 6.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while JVCZY trades at $46.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas JVCZY's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to JVCZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to JVCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs SHCAF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, SHCAF has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while SHCAF trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas SHCAF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to SHCAF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to SHCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs TCLHF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, TCLHF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while TCLHF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas TCLHF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to TCLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to TCLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs SHCAY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, SHCAY has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while SHCAY trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas SHCAY's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to SHCAY's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SHCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs CSIOF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, CSIOF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while CSIOF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas CSIOF's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to CSIOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to CSIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs CSIOY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, CSIOY has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while CSIOY trades at $72.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas CSIOY's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to CSIOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to CSIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs AITUY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, AITUY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while AITUY trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas AITUY's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to AITUY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to AITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs SNCPF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, SNCPF has a market cap of 957.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while SNCPF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas SNCPF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to SNCPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SNCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs SWDHF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, SWDHF has a market cap of 936.72M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while SWDHF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas SWDHF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to SWDHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to SWDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs BGOUF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, BGOUF has a market cap of 283.53M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while BGOUF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas BGOUF's P/E ratio is -32.47. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to BGOUF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to BGOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs ADPXY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, ADPXY has a market cap of 116.00M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while ADPXY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas ADPXY's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to ADPXY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to ADPXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs VTEPF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, VTEPF has a market cap of 92.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while VTEPF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas VTEPF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to VTEPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to VTEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs HLOC Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, HLOC has a market cap of 69.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while HLOC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas HLOC's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to HLOC's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to HLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs DBOXF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, DBOXF has a market cap of 30.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while DBOXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas DBOXF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to DBOXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to DBOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs CHWTF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, CHWTF has a market cap of 19.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while CHWTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas CHWTF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to CHWTF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to CHWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs AMOSF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, AMOSF has a market cap of 38904.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while AMOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas AMOSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to AMOSF's ROE of -8.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to AMOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs NUHRF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, NUHRF has a market cap of 27054.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while NUHRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas NUHRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to NUHRF's ROE of -3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to NUHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs GAXY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, GAXY has a market cap of 23306.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while GAXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas GAXY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to GAXY's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to GAXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs COLCF Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, COLCF has a market cap of 8252.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while COLCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas COLCF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to COLCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to COLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs ANDR Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, ANDR has a market cap of 6811.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while ANDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas ANDR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to ANDR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to ANDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs BZIC Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, BZIC has a market cap of 6750.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while BZIC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas BZIC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to BZIC's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to BZIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs NGEY Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, NGEY has a market cap of 5732.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while NGEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas NGEY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to NGEY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to NGEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs CTXV Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, CTXV has a market cap of 2450.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while CTXV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas CTXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to CTXV's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to CTXV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs PUMD Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, PUMD has a market cap of 1861.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while PUMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas PUMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to PUMD's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to PUMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs ZVTK Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, ZVTK has a market cap of 1407.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while ZVTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas ZVTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to ZVTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to ZVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs GAXYQ Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, GAXYQ has a market cap of 1165.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while GAXYQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas GAXYQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to GAXYQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to GAXYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs LTEC Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, LTEC has a market cap of 486.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while LTEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas LTEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to LTEC's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is more volatile compared to LTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs CYRD Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, CYRD has a market cap of 343.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while CYRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas CYRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to CYRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to CYRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.
HAPBF vs NYXO Comparison
HAPBF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPBF stands at 14.34M. In comparison, NYXO has a market cap of 242.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPBF is priced at $0.08, while NYXO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPBF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.75, whereas NYXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPBF's ROE is +2.21%, compared to NYXO's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPBF is less volatile compared to NYXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPBF.