Hamak Gold Limited
Hamak Gold Limited (HAMA.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HAMA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAMA.L | £4.96 | -20.00% | 31.4M | -6.95 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| PLZL.IL | £19,650.50 | +4.07% | 25.7T | 3429.41 | £5.73 | N/A |
| 0R4M.L | £463.20 | +1.29% | 107.3B | 663.88 | £0.67 | +3.46% |
| 0QYZ.L | £220.13 | -0.54% | 42.4B | 43.86 | £5.02 | +0.88% |
| 0R28.L | £52.11 | +0.00% | 42.3B | 39.39 | £1.32 | +1.60% |
| WPM.L | £7,020.00 | +0.86% | 31.5B | 68.04 | £1.02 | +0.70% |
| EDV.L | £2,332.00 | +0.00% | 5.6B | -74.19 | -£0.31 | +3.34% |
| AUY.L | £475.00 | +1.06% | 4.6B | -5.72 | -£0.83 | N/A |
| CEY.L | £146.00 | N/A | 1.7B | 24.33 | £0.06 | +0.90% |
| GGP.L | £260.55 | +0.21% | 1.6B | 242.00 | £0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HAMA.L vs PLZL.IL Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, PLZL.IL has a market cap of 25.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while PLZL.IL trades at £19,650.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas PLZL.IL's P/E ratio is 3429.41. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PLZL.IL's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to PLZL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check PLZL.IL's competition here
HAMA.L vs 0R4M.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, 0R4M.L has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while 0R4M.L trades at £463.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas 0R4M.L's P/E ratio is 663.88. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to 0R4M.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to 0R4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check 0R4M.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs 0QYZ.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, 0QYZ.L has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while 0QYZ.L trades at £220.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas 0QYZ.L's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to 0QYZ.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to 0QYZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check 0QYZ.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs 0R28.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, 0R28.L has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while 0R28.L trades at £52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas 0R28.L's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to 0R28.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to 0R28.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check 0R28.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs WPM.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, WPM.L has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while WPM.L trades at £7,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas WPM.L's P/E ratio is 68.04. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WPM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to WPM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check WPM.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs EDV.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, EDV.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while EDV.L trades at £2,332.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas EDV.L's P/E ratio is -74.19. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EDV.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to EDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check EDV.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs AUY.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, AUY.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while AUY.L trades at £475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas AUY.L's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AUY.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to AUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check AUY.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs CEY.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, CEY.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while CEY.L trades at £146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas CEY.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CEY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to CEY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check CEY.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs GGP.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, GGP.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while GGP.L trades at £260.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas GGP.L's P/E ratio is 242.00. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GGP.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to GGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check GGP.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs HOC.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, HOC.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while HOC.L trades at £291.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas HOC.L's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HOC.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to HOC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check HOC.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs PAF.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, PAF.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while PAF.L trades at £55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas PAF.L's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PAF.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to PAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check PAF.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs RSG.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, RSG.L has a market cap of 647.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while RSG.L trades at £29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas RSG.L's P/E ratio is -30.40. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RSG.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to RSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check RSG.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs MTL.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, MTL.L has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while MTL.L trades at £13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas MTL.L's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MTL.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to MTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check MTL.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs AMRQ.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, AMRQ.L has a market cap of 340.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while AMRQ.L trades at £76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas AMRQ.L's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AMRQ.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to AMRQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check AMRQ.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs CMCL.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, CMCL.L has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while CMCL.L trades at £1,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas CMCL.L's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CMCL.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to CMCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check CMCL.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs THX.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, THX.L has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while THX.L trades at £39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas THX.L's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to THX.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to THX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check THX.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs AAZ.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, AAZ.L has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while AAZ.L trades at £160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas AAZ.L's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AAZ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to AAZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check AAZ.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs ALTN.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, ALTN.L has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while ALTN.L trades at £607.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas ALTN.L's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALTN.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to ALTN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check ALTN.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs SHG.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, SHG.L has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while SHG.L trades at £14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas SHG.L's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SHG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to SHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check SHG.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs SRB.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, SRB.L has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while SRB.L trades at £185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas SRB.L's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SRB.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to SRB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check SRB.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs CNR.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, CNR.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while CNR.L trades at £32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas CNR.L's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to CNR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check CNR.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs KEFI.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, KEFI.L has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while KEFI.L trades at £0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas KEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KEFI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to KEFI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check KEFI.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs HUM.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, HUM.L has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while HUM.L trades at £2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas HUM.L's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HUM.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to HUM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check HUM.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs AAU.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, AAU.L has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while AAU.L trades at £1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas AAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to AAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check AAU.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs OMI.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, OMI.L has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while OMI.L trades at £10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas OMI.L's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OMI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to OMI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check OMI.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs 0UH8.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, 0UH8.L has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while 0UH8.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas 0UH8.L's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to 0UH8.L's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to 0UH8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check 0UH8.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs PAT.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, PAT.L has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while PAT.L trades at £13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas PAT.L's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PAT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to PAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check PAT.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs CORA.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, CORA.L has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while CORA.L trades at £6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas CORA.L's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CORA.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to CORA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check CORA.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs 0VLY.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, 0VLY.L has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while 0VLY.L trades at £0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas 0VLY.L's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to 0VLY.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to 0VLY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check 0VLY.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs LEX.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, LEX.L has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while LEX.L trades at £3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas LEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LEX.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to LEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check LEX.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs WSBN.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, WSBN.L has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while WSBN.L trades at £0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas WSBN.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WSBN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to WSBN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check WSBN.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs GDP.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, GDP.L has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while GDP.L trades at £6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas GDP.L's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GDP.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to GDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check GDP.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs SGZ.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, SGZ.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while SGZ.L trades at £12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas SGZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SGZ.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to SGZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check SGZ.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs ORR.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, ORR.L has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while ORR.L trades at £0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas ORR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ORR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to ORR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check ORR.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs GCAT.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, GCAT.L has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while GCAT.L trades at £0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas GCAT.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GCAT.L's ROE of +5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to GCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check GCAT.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs 0V9B.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, 0V9B.L has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while 0V9B.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas 0V9B.L's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to 0V9B.L's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to 0V9B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check 0V9B.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs GRL.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, GRL.L has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while GRL.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas GRL.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GRL.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to GRL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check GRL.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs XTR.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, XTR.L has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while XTR.L trades at £0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas XTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to XTR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to XTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check XTR.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs CNG.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, CNG.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while CNG.L trades at £1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas CNG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CNG.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to CNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check CNG.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs PALM.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, PALM.L has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while PALM.L trades at £85.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas PALM.L's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PALM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to PALM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check PALM.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs GAL.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, GAL.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while GAL.L trades at £3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas GAL.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GAL.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to GAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check GAL.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs ECR.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, ECR.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while ECR.L trades at £0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas ECR.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ECR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to ECR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check ECR.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs 0V2Y.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, 0V2Y.L has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while 0V2Y.L trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas 0V2Y.L's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to 0V2Y.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to 0V2Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check 0V2Y.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs CGNR.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, CGNR.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while CGNR.L trades at £5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas CGNR.L's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CGNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to CGNR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check CGNR.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs CGH.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, CGH.L has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while CGH.L trades at £0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas CGH.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CGH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to CGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check CGH.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs KAT.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, KAT.L has a market cap of 947.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while KAT.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas KAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KAT.L's ROE of +11.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to KAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check KAT.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs POG.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, POG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while POG.L trades at £1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas POG.L's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to POG.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to POG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check POG.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs AEXG.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, AEXG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while AEXG.L trades at £40.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas AEXG.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AEXG.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to AEXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check AEXG.L's competition here
HAMA.L vs PUR.L Comparison August 2025
HAMA.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMA.L stands at 31.4M. In comparison, PUR.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAMA.L is priced at £4.96, while PUR.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -6.95, whereas PUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAMA.L's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PUR.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMA.L is more volatile compared to PUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMA.L.Check PUR.L's competition here