Gamesys Group plc
Gamesys Group plc GYS.L Peers
See (GYS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GYS.L | $1,850.00 | +0.22% | N/A | 0.30 | $61.50 | N/A |
| FLTR.L | $18,615.00 | -0.61% | 32.89B | 85.00 | $2.19 | N/A |
| 0A37.L | $183.40 | -1.19% | 25.33B | 245.52 | $0.75 | +4.54% |
| 0ABA.L | $50.93 | +21.26% | 18.31B | -12.57 | -$4.05 | N/A |
| 0JWC.L | $33.54 | -1.40% | 9.13B | 10.68 | $3.14 | N/A |
| 0LK3.L | $151.54 | +0.93% | 5.66B | 19.57 | $7.75 | +5.86% |
| ENT.L | $770.60 | +0.34% | 4.93B | -10.85 | -$0.71 | +2.41% |
| 0EAW.L | $188.69 | N/A | 3.32B | 160.58 | $1.18 | N/A |
| 0O80.L | $102.50 | -0.27% | 2.51B | 341.67 | $0.30 | +1.46% |
| PTEC.L | $355.50 | -0.14% | 1.09B | 22.22 | $0.16 | +1.36% |
Stock Comparison
GYS.L vs FLTR.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FLTR.L has a market cap of 32.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while FLTR.L trades at $18,615.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas FLTR.L's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLTR.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to FLTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs 0A37.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0A37.L has a market cap of 25.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while 0A37.L trades at $183.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas 0A37.L's P/E ratio is 245.52. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0A37.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to 0A37.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs 0ABA.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0ABA.L has a market cap of 18.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while 0ABA.L trades at $50.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas 0ABA.L's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0ABA.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to 0ABA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs 0JWC.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JWC.L has a market cap of 9.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while 0JWC.L trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas 0JWC.L's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JWC.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to 0JWC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs 0LK3.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LK3.L has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while 0LK3.L trades at $151.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas 0LK3.L's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LK3.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to 0LK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs ENT.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ENT.L has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while ENT.L trades at $770.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas ENT.L's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENT.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to ENT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs 0EAW.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0EAW.L has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while 0EAW.L trades at $188.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas 0EAW.L's P/E ratio is 160.58. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0EAW.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is less volatile compared to 0EAW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs 0O80.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0O80.L has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while 0O80.L trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas 0O80.L's P/E ratio is 341.67. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0O80.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to 0O80.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs PTEC.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PTEC.L has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while PTEC.L trades at $355.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas PTEC.L's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTEC.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to PTEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs RNK.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RNK.L has a market cap of 561.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while RNK.L trades at $119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas RNK.L's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RNK.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is less volatile compared to RNK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs 888.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 888.L has a market cap of 383.53M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while 888.L trades at $85.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas 888.L's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 888.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to 888.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs EVOK.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EVOK.L has a market cap of 241.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while EVOK.L trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas EVOK.L's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVOK.L's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is less volatile compared to EVOK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs GMR.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GMR.L has a market cap of 136.64M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while GMR.L trades at $46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas GMR.L's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMR.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is less volatile compared to GMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs BOTB.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BOTB.L has a market cap of 45.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while BOTB.L trades at $532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas BOTB.L's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOTB.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to BOTB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs CMX.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CMX.L has a market cap of 9.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while CMX.L trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas CMX.L's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMX.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to CMX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs B90.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, B90.L has a market cap of 8.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while B90.L trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas B90.L's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to B90.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is less volatile compared to B90.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs SPO.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SPO.L has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while SPO.L trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas SPO.L's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPO.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GYS.L has daily volatility of 2.88 and SPO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
GYS.L vs TNT.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TNT.L has a market cap of 5.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while TNT.L trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas TNT.L's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNT.L's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GYS.L has daily volatility of 2.88 and TNT.L has daily volatility of N/A.
GYS.L vs MIN.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MIN.L has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while MIN.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas MIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is more volatile compared to MIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.
GYS.L vs WEB.L Comparison
GYS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GYS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, WEB.L has a market cap of 295003.00. Regarding current trading prices, GYS.L is priced at $1,850.00, while WEB.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GYS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.30, whereas WEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GYS.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEB.L's ROE of +5.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GYS.L is less volatile compared to WEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GYS.L.