Gowest Gold Ltd.
Gowest Gold Ltd. GWSAF Peers
See (GWSAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWSAF | $0.10 | -0.39% | 74.4M | -10.16 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.39 | N/A | 67.4B | 12.58 | $0.19 | +2.21% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $21.03 | N/A | 18.8B | 15.24 | $1.38 | +2.60% |
| NESRF | $12.78 | +0.02% | 18.3B | 24.12 | $0.53 | +1.65% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.42% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| CAHPF | $5.83 | N/A | 11.6B | 25.35 | $0.23 | +1.02% |
Stock Comparison
GWSAF vs ZIJMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ZIJMF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs OPYGY Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs GFIOF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while GFIOF trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs NESRF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while NESRF trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs NSTYY Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs HCHDY Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs NCMGY Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs NCMGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs CAHPF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while CAHPF trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs KOZAY Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs LUGDF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while LUGDF trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs HGMCF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while HGMCF trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ZHAOF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs AULGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs EDVMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while EDVMF trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -72.90. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs SBYSF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while SBYSF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs DGMLF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ARGTF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ARGTF trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -233.21. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ZIJMY Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ZIJMY trades at $47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs PMNXF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while PMNXF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs OCANF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while OCANF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs CRNLF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while CRNLF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 49.85. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs TORXF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while TORXF trades at $32.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs DPMLF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while DPMLF trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs GRLGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while GRLGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -18.72. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RGRNF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RGRNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -324.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs KNTNF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while KNTNF trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ELKMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ELKMF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs GSISF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs CELTF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs REDLF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while REDLF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs WDOFF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while WDOFF trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RMLRF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RMLRF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs HCHDF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while HCHDF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs CXBMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while CXBMF trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs EOGSF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs WFRSF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while WFRSF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ORAAF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ORAAF trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs DRDGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs PAFRF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs OBNNF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MAUTF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MAUTF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -17.94. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs AURQF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MWSNF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 968.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MWSNF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -76.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs SVLKF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs BELGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while BELGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs SNWGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while SNWGF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -39.79. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs SGSVF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RUPRF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 868.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RUPRF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -185.55. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs KRRGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RMGGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 851.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RMGGF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs WTGRF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RGDFF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs PDIYF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 655.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs GUYGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 572.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while GUYGF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -79.33. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MNSAF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 528.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MNSAF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs NVMLF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ARNGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ORZCF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 461.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ORZCF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ASGOF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 421.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ASGOF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs KSKGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ECRTF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ECRTF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs LMGDF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while LMGDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RSRBF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 353.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RSRBF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MNDJF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 351.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MNDJF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs PROBF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while PROBF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs TPRXF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RIOFF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 336.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RIOFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 79.10. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs THXPF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while THXPF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs FDMIF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 323.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while FDMIF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -37.78. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ALKEF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ALKEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MAKOF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MAKOF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MGDPF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs OGNRF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while OGNRF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 133.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs RMLFF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while RMLFF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ELEMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ELEMF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 53.60. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs OSIIF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs ERRSF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs WRLGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while WRLGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs HSTXF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while HSTXF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs JAGGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while JAGGF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs SAAGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs CNLMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs SRBIF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while SRBIF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs OMGGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while OMGGF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -31.67. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs DCCNF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs THSGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 180.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while THSGF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs CNMXF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs STBMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while STBMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs STPGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while STPGF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs GDRZF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while GDRZF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs GGAZF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while GGAZF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs EEYMF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs AGXKF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs DNGDF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while DNGDF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs NVOOF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MAIFF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MAIFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs FFMGF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while FFMGF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.
GWSAF vs MFGCF Comparison
GWSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWSAF stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MFGCF has a market cap of 128.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWSAF is priced at $0.10, while MFGCF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.16, whereas MFGCF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, GWSAF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MFGCF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GWSAF is more volatile compared to MFGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWSAF.