GURU Organic Energy Corp.

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, COLA.NE has a market cap of 416.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while COLA.NE trades at CA$24.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas COLA.NE's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to COLA.NE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to COLA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check COLA.NE's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, PRMW.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while PRMW.TO trades at CA$37.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas PRMW.TO's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PRMW.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to PRMW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check PRMW.TO's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, LAS-A.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while LAS-A.TO trades at CA$213.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas LAS-A.TO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LAS-A.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to LAS-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check LAS-A.TO's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, WTER.CN has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while WTER.CN trades at CA$0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas WTER.CN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WTER.CN's ROE of -6.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to WTER.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check WTER.CN's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, JSDA.CN has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while JSDA.CN trades at CA$0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas JSDA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JSDA.CN's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to JSDA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check JSDA.CN's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, BEV.CN has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while BEV.CN trades at CA$0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas BEV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BEV.CN's ROE of +10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to BEV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check BEV.CN's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, FLOW.TO has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while FLOW.TO trades at CA$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas FLOW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FLOW.TO's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is less volatile compared to FLOW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check FLOW.TO's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, NEVI.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while NEVI.CN trades at CA$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas NEVI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NEVI.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to NEVI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check NEVI.CN's competition here

GURU.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GURU.TO stands at 58M. In comparison, MILK.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GURU.TO is priced at CA$1.95, while MILK.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GURU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.72, whereas MILK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, GURU.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MILK.CN's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GURU.TO is more volatile compared to MILK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURU.TO.Check MILK.CN's competition here