Greentown China Holdings Limited
Greentown China Holdings Limited (GTWCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GTWCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTWCF | $1.45 | +0.00% | 3.7B | -145.00 | -$0.01 | +2.90% |
| CDVM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 270.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MGAWY | $7.54 | +3.71% | 245.1B | 3.46 | $2.18 | +4.38% |
| SUHJY | $17.84 | +3.36% | 50.8B | 20.64 | $0.85 | +2.51% |
| SUHJF | $15.97 | +0.00% | 46.3B | 18.79 | $0.85 | +3.02% |
| CRBJF | $3.98 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 7.37 | $0.54 | +4.63% |
| CRBJY | $35.73 | +0.00% | 25.5B | 6.47 | $5.52 | +4.97% |
| DWAHF | $38.55 | +0.00% | 23.9B | 12.12 | $3.18 | +2.69% |
| DWAHY | $35.81 | +0.12% | 22.1B | 11.08 | $3.22 | +2.26% |
| CNGKY | $12.16 | -2.32% | 21B | 14.46 | $0.83 | +3.56% |
Stock Comparison
GTWCF vs CDVM Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CDVM has a market cap of 270.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CDVM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CDVM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CDVM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDVM's competition here
GTWCF vs MGAWY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MGAWY has a market cap of 245.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while MGAWY trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas MGAWY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGAWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to MGAWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check MGAWY's competition here
GTWCF vs SUHJY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SUHJY has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SUHJY trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SUHJY's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUHJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SUHJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUHJY's competition here
GTWCF vs SUHJF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SUHJF has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SUHJF trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SUHJF's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUHJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SUHJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUHJF's competition here
GTWCF vs CRBJF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CRBJF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CRBJF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CRBJF's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRBJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CRBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRBJF's competition here
GTWCF vs CRBJY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CRBJY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CRBJY trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CRBJY's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRBJY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CRBJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRBJY's competition here
GTWCF vs DWAHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DWAHF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while DWAHF trades at $38.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas DWAHF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DWAHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to DWAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check DWAHF's competition here
GTWCF vs DWAHY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DWAHY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while DWAHY trades at $35.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas DWAHY's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DWAHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to DWAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check DWAHY's competition here
GTWCF vs CNGKY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CNGKY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CNGKY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CNGKY's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNGKY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to CNGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check CNGKY's competition here
GTWCF vs CAOVY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CAOVY has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CAOVY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CAOVY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAOVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to CAOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check CAOVY's competition here
GTWCF vs CHKGF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CHKGF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CHKGF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CHKGF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHKGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CHKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHKGF's competition here
GTWCF vs HNGKY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HNGKY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while HNGKY trades at $44.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas HNGKY's P/E ratio is -56.79. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HNGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to HNGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check HNGKY's competition here
GTWCF vs HKHGF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HKHGF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while HKHGF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas HKHGF's P/E ratio is -56.07. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HKHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to HKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check HKHGF's competition here
GTWCF vs CAOVF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CAOVF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CAOVF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CAOVF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAOVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CAOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOVF's competition here
GTWCF vs SNLAY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SNLAY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SNLAY trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SNLAY's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNLAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to SNLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check SNLAY's competition here
GTWCF vs PDGRY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PDGRY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while PDGRY trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas PDGRY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PDGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to PDGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check PDGRY's competition here
GTWCF vs SNLAF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SNLAF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SNLAF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SNLAF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SNLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNLAF's competition here
GTWCF vs CTPVF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CTPVF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CTPVF trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CTPVF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CTPVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CTPVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTPVF's competition here
GTWCF vs WARFY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WARFY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while WARFY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas WARFY's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WARFY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and WARFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WARFY's competition here
GTWCF vs DWHHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DWHHF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while DWHHF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas DWHHF's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DWHHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and DWHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWHHF's competition here
GTWCF vs WARFF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WARFF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while WARFF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas WARFF's P/E ratio is -23.69. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WARFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and WARFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WARFF's competition here
GTWCF vs LNGPF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LNGPF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while LNGPF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas LNGPF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LNGPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and LNGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNGPF's competition here
GTWCF vs LGFRY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LGFRY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while LGFRY trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas LGFRY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to LGFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check LGFRY's competition here
GTWCF vs UOLGY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UOLGY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while UOLGY trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas UOLGY's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UOLGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to UOLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check UOLGY's competition here
GTWCF vs CHVKF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CHVKF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CHVKF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CHVKF's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHVKF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CHVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHVKF's competition here
GTWCF vs UOLGF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UOLGF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while UOLGF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas UOLGF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UOLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and UOLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UOLGF's competition here
GTWCF vs CDEVY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CDEVY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CDEVY trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CDEVY's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDEVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to CDEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check CDEVY's competition here
GTWCF vs CDEVF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CDEVF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CDEVF trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CDEVF's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDEVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to CDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check CDEVF's competition here
GTWCF vs SCCCF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SCCCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SCCCF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SCCCF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCCCF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SCCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCCCF's competition here
GTWCF vs CWQXY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CWQXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CWQXY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CWQXY's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CWQXY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CWQXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWQXY's competition here
GTWCF vs CWQXF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CWQXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CWQXF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CWQXF's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CWQXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CWQXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWQXF's competition here
GTWCF vs AYAAF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AYAAF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while AYAAF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas AYAAF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AYAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and AYAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYAAF's competition here
GTWCF vs DTCWY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DTCWY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while DTCWY trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas DTCWY's P/E ratio is -17.73. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DTCWY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and DTCWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTCWY's competition here
GTWCF vs SZENF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SZENF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SZENF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SZENF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SZENF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SZENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZENF's competition here
GTWCF vs KRYPF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KRYPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while KRYPF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas KRYPF's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRYPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and KRYPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRYPF's competition here
GTWCF vs CTRYY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CTRYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CTRYY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CTRYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CTRYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CTRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTRYY's competition here
GTWCF vs KRYPY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KRYPY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while KRYPY trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas KRYPY's P/E ratio is 47.14. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRYPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and KRYPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRYPY's competition here
GTWCF vs CHVKY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CHVKY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CHVKY trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CHVKY's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHVKY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CHVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHVKY's competition here
GTWCF vs CFFHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CFFHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CFFHF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CFFHF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CFFHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFFHF's competition here
GTWCF vs BRKFF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BRKFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while BRKFF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas BRKFF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRKFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and BRKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRKFF's competition here
GTWCF vs EGRNY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, EGRNY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while EGRNY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas EGRNY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EGRNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and EGRNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGRNY's competition here
GTWCF vs CAIAF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CAIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CAIAF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CAIAF's P/E ratio is 164.71. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAIAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CAIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAIAF's competition here
GTWCF vs SIMEF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SIMEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SIMEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SIMEF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIMEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to SIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check SIMEF's competition here
GTWCF vs CJNHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CJNHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CJNHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CJNHF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CJNHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CJNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CJNHF's competition here
GTWCF vs SHMAY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SHMAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SHMAY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SHMAY's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHMAY's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SHMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHMAY's competition here
GTWCF vs FRSHY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FRSHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while FRSHY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas FRSHY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRSHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and FRSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRSHY's competition here
GTWCF vs ARLLF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ARLLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while ARLLF trades at $77.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas ARLLF's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and ARLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARLLF's competition here
GTWCF vs BSPDY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BSPDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while BSPDY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas BSPDY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BSPDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and BSPDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSPDY's competition here
GTWCF vs LDHUF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LDHUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while LDHUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas LDHUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LDHUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and LDHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LDHUF's competition here
GTWCF vs RBLAY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RBLAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while RBLAY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas RBLAY's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RBLAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and RBLAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBLAY's competition here
GTWCF vs PHKIF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PHKIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while PHKIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas PHKIF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PHKIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to PHKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check PHKIF's competition here
GTWCF vs YLDGY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, YLDGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while YLDGY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas YLDGY's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YLDGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and YLDGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YLDGY's competition here
GTWCF vs YLDGF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, YLDGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while YLDGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas YLDGF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YLDGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and YLDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YLDGF's competition here
GTWCF vs GZUHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GZUHF has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while GZUHF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas GZUHF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GZUHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and GZUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GZUHF's competition here
GTWCF vs MGAWF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MGAWF has a market cap of 847.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while MGAWF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas MGAWF's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGAWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and MGAWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGAWF's competition here
GTWCF vs SZNTF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SZNTF has a market cap of 847.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SZNTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SZNTF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SZNTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SZNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZNTF's competition here
GTWCF vs TIACF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TIACF has a market cap of 840.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while TIACF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas TIACF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and TIACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIACF's competition here
GTWCF vs AGPYF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AGPYF has a market cap of 797.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while AGPYF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas AGPYF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGPYF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to AGPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check AGPYF's competition here
GTWCF vs CAOYF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CAOYF has a market cap of 778.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CAOYF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CAOYF's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAOYF's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CAOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOYF's competition here
GTWCF vs KWHAF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KWHAF has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while KWHAF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas KWHAF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KWHAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and KWHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWHAF's competition here
GTWCF vs CDCTF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CDCTF has a market cap of 683M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CDCTF trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CDCTF's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CDCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDCTF's competition here
GTWCF vs SOLLF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SOLLF has a market cap of 680.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SOLLF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SOLLF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOLLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SOLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOLLF's competition here
GTWCF vs CTRYF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CTRYF has a market cap of 658.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CTRYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CTRYF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CTRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CTRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTRYF's competition here
GTWCF vs DRUNF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DRUNF has a market cap of 626.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while DRUNF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas DRUNF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DRUNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and DRUNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRUNF's competition here
GTWCF vs LPHHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LPHHF has a market cap of 606.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while LPHHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas LPHHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LPHHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and LPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPHHF's competition here
GTWCF vs CCLHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CCLHF has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CCLHF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CCLHF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CCLHF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CCLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCLHF's competition here
GTWCF vs WFICF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WFICF has a market cap of 428.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while WFICF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas WFICF's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WFICF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to WFICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check WFICF's competition here
GTWCF vs MODVF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MODVF has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while MODVF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas MODVF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MODVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to MODVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check MODVF's competition here
GTWCF vs SIOPF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SIOPF has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SIOPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SIOPF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIOPF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SIOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIOPF's competition here
GTWCF vs AYAAY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AYAAY has a market cap of 298.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while AYAAY trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas AYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AYAAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and AYAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYAAY's competition here
GTWCF vs BEIJF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BEIJF has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while BEIJF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas BEIJF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BEIJF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and BEIJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEIJF's competition here
GTWCF vs AGPYY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AGPYY has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while AGPYY trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas AGPYY's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGPYY's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and AGPYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGPYY's competition here
GTWCF vs FRTCF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FRTCF has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while FRTCF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas FRTCF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRTCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to FRTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check FRTCF's competition here
GTWCF vs GNLAF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GNLAF has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while GNLAF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas GNLAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GNLAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and GNLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNLAF's competition here
GTWCF vs TMPPF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TMPPF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while TMPPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas TMPPF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TMPPF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and TMPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMPPF's competition here
GTWCF vs KWGPF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KWGPF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while KWGPF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas KWGPF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KWGPF's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and KWGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWGPF's competition here
GTWCF vs DRSLF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DRSLF has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while DRSLF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas DRSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DRSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and DRSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRSLF's competition here
GTWCF vs YUZHF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, YUZHF has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while YUZHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas YUZHF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YUZHF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and YUZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUZHF's competition here
GTWCF vs FHRT Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FHRT has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while FHRT trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas FHRT's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and FHRT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FHRT's competition here
GTWCF vs GCCO Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GCCO has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while GCCO trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas GCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GCCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and GCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCCO's competition here
GTWCF vs BAKBF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BAKBF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while BAKBF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas BAKBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BAKBF's ROE of +3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and BAKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAKBF's competition here
GTWCF vs SIUDF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SIUDF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SIUDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SIUDF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIUDF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SIUDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIUDF's competition here
GTWCF vs KDCCF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KDCCF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while KDCCF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas KDCCF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KDCCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and KDCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDCCF's competition here
GTWCF vs GZUHY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GZUHY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while GZUHY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas GZUHY's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GZUHY's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and GZUHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GZUHY's competition here
GTWCF vs ILAL Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ILAL has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while ILAL trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas ILAL's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ILAL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to ILAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check ILAL's competition here
GTWCF vs SOLLY Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SOLLY has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SOLLY trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SOLLY's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOLLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SOLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOLLY's competition here
GTWCF vs SRRE Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SRRE has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while SRRE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas SRRE's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SRRE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and SRRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRRE's competition here
GTWCF vs TKCM Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TKCM has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while TKCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas TKCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TKCM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to TKCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check TKCM's competition here
GTWCF vs HIHI Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HIHI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while HIHI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas HIHI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HIHI's ROE of +3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF is less volatile compared to HIHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTWCF.Check HIHI's competition here
GTWCF vs URBDF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, URBDF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while URBDF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas URBDF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to URBDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and URBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URBDF's competition here
GTWCF vs GRLT Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GRLT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while GRLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas GRLT's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRLT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and GRLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRLT's competition here
GTWCF vs UCASU Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UCASU has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while UCASU trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas UCASU's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UCASU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and UCASU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UCASU's competition here
GTWCF vs RGSG Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RGSG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while RGSG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas RGSG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGSG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and RGSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGSG's competition here
GTWCF vs EGRNF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, EGRNF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while EGRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas EGRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EGRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and EGRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGRNF's competition here
GTWCF vs YTRGF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, YTRGF has a market cap of 799.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while YTRGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas YTRGF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YTRGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and YTRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YTRGF's competition here
GTWCF vs FLLLF Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FLLLF has a market cap of 379K. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while FLLLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas FLLLF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLLLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and FLLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLLLF's competition here
GTWCF vs XTRM Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, XTRM has a market cap of 333.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while XTRM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas XTRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XTRM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and XTRM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XTRM's competition here
GTWCF vs CHIT Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CHIT has a market cap of 188.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while CHIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas CHIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHIT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and CHIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHIT's competition here
GTWCF vs GLCO Comparison February 2026
GTWCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTWCF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GLCO has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GTWCF is priced at $1.45, while GLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTWCF currently has a P/E ratio of -145.00, whereas GLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTWCF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GLCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTWCF and GLCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLCO's competition here