Gran Tierra Energy Inc.
Gran Tierra Energy Inc. GTE.TO Peers
See (GTE.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTE.TO | CA$6.68 | -1.47% | 236M | -10.95 | -CA$0.61 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | CA$42.31 | -1.92% | 88.6B | 11.88 | CA$3.56 | +5.21% |
| TOU.TO | CA$62.93 | -0.63% | 23.6B | 18.62 | CA$3.38 | +2.71% |
| ARX.TO | CA$29.16 | -1.62% | 17.1B | 12.90 | CA$2.26 | +2.47% |
| OVV.TO | CA$51.14 | -1.80% | 13.3B | 15.64 | CA$3.27 | +3.30% |
| WCP.TO | CA$8.65 | -0.35% | 10.6B | 5.65 | CA$1.53 | +8.44% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +5.03% |
| MEG.TO | CA$25.04 | +0.20% | 6.4B | 10.75 | CA$2.33 | +1.19% |
| SCR.TO | CA$29.52 | -1.04% | 6.3B | 8.92 | CA$3.31 | +2.59% |
| ERF.TO | CA$26.78 | -3.36% | 5.7B | 10.93 | CA$2.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GTE.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while TOU.TO trades at CA$62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while ARX.TO trades at CA$29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while OVV.TO trades at CA$51.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while WCP.TO trades at CA$8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while MEG.TO trades at CA$25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while SCR.TO trades at CA$29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while ERF.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PSK.TO trades at CA$23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PEY.TO trades at CA$19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs POU.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while POU.TO trades at CA$19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while NVA.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while ATH.TO trades at CA$5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while TVE.TO trades at CA$4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while FRU.TO trades at CA$12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while AAV.TO trades at CA$11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -63.56. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while BIR.TO trades at CA$6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while BTE.TO trades at CA$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while HWX.TO trades at CA$6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs VET.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while VET.TO trades at CA$9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -43.52. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PXT.TO trades at CA$14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while KEL.TO trades at CA$6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs CR.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CJ.TO trades at CA$6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 776.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while KEC.TO trades at CA$17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while VLE.TO trades at CA$7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 670.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while SDE.TO trades at CA$3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 576.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 543.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while SGY.TO trades at CA$5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 509.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while OBE.TO trades at CA$6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 499.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -40.27. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 470M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while FEC.TO trades at CA$6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 418.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while GFR.TO trades at CA$5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 358.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while KEI.TO trades at CA$9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while ITE.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while IPO.TO trades at CA$9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 131.00. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 162.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while RBY.TO trades at CA$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while BNE.TO trades at CA$3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 69.60. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CDR.TO trades at CA$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while JOY.TO trades at CA$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while YGR.TO trades at CA$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CNE.TO trades at CA$2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.21. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GTE.TO has daily volatility of 3.26 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
GTE.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is less volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while OIL.CN trades at CA$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs EI.CN Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.
GTE.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison
GTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTE.TO stands at 236M. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTE.TO is priced at CA$6.68, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.95, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, GTE.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTE.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTE.TO.