GSV, Inc.
GSV, Inc. GSVI Peers
See (GSVI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSVI | $0.00 | N/A | 750 | N/A | -$0.35 | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +1.45% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $16.10 | +2.19% | 30.5B | 8.61 | $1.87 | +7.61% |
| TRMLF | $48.96 | +0.27% | 18.9B | 19.82 | $2.47 | +5.38% |
| IPXHY | $14.46 | -2.30% | 17.3B | 5.90 | $2.45 | +2.92% |
| STOSF | $5.25 | +19.05% | 17B | 13.82 | $0.38 | +4.47% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| IPXHF | $13.80 | +0.95% | 16.5B | 5.66 | $2.44 | +3.68% |
| PEXNY | $8.17 | -0.97% | 16.2B | 6.87 | $1.19 | +6.12% |
Stock Comparison
GSVI vs MEYYY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs NSTKF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs WOPEF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while WOPEF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs TRMLF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while TRMLF trades at $48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs IPXHY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while IPXHY trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs STOSF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while STOSF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs DETNF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs IPXHF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while IPXHF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PEXNY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PEXNY trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs SSLZY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while SSLZY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs AETUF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while AETUF trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs NOVKY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs SPGYF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while SPGYF trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs WLLBW Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, WLLBW has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while WLLBW trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to WLLBW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to WLLBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PTRRY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PTRRY trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs VSOGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs MEGEF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while MEGEF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs DKDRF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while DKDRF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PREKF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PREKF trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs HBRIY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while HBRIY trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -28.20. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PMOIF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PMOIF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs DLKGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while DLKGF trades at $186.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs DELKY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while DELKY trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PEYUF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PEYUF trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs OASPW Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PRMRF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PRMRF trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs EERGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs BTEGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs NUVSF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while NUVSF trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs ATHOF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while ATHOF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs UNEGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while UNEGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs BEPTF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while BEPTF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs BCHEY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while BCHEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs JPTXF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while JPTXF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs IPCFF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while IPCFF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs FRHLF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while FRHLF trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PTGIF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs AAVVF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while AAVVF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -68.85. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs BIREF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while BIREF trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs CDDRF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while CDDRF trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs EFVIF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs CRCQW Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs WLLAW Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs KELTF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while KELTF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs DTNOF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while DTNOF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PARXF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PARXF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PQEFF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PQEFF has a market cap of 978M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PQEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PQEFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PQEFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PQEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs AOIFF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 894.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while AOIFF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs SOGFF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, SOGFF has a market cap of 879.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while SOGFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGFF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to SOGFF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is less volatile compared to SOGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs CWEGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs SQZZF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 845M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while SQZZF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs CRLFF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 821.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while CRLFF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs KRNGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 740.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while KRNGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs BWEFF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while BWEFF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs AAGEF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs KWTEF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 565.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while KWTEF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs DALXF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 556.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while DALXF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs GFKSY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PTALF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 461M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PTALF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs GUKYF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 455.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while GUKYF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs ZPTAF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 446M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while ZPTAF trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -14.97. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs COPJF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while COPJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PTHRF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 428.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PTHRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs RCKHF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 417.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while RCKHF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs TBNRF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs ATUUF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while ATUUF trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -44.09. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs KRNGY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 397.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while KRNGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs SHASF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 393.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while SHASF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs TUWLF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while TUWLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs BKBEF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs FECCF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while FECCF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs RZREF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, RZREF has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while RZREF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RZREF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to RZREF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI and RZREF have similar daily volatility (196.04).
GSVI vs PRYGF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs CEIEF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while CEIEF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -32.35. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs ENQUF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs OILSF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 310.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while OILSF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs TUWOY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 292.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while TUWOY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PEGIY Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PEGIY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PESAF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs EXCE Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while EXCE trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs GEGYF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs CRNZF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while CRNZF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs HZNFF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs MEOAF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, MEOAF has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while MEOAF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to MEOAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to MEOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs IPOOF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 200.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while IPOOF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs ITEEF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs ZNOG Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while ZNOG trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -17.82. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs SEUSF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 194.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while SEUSF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs CVONF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while CVONF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PSHIF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs HRCXF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs LNDNF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while LNDNF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs EEGUF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while EEGUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs RECWF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs GASXF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while GASXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs ALVOF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while ALVOF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PIFYF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PIFYF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs PNWRF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.
GSVI vs KGEIF Comparison
GSVI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSVI stands at 750. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, GSVI is priced at $0.00, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSVI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, GSVI's ROE is -2.99%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSVI is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSVI.