Global Seafood Technologies, Inc.
Global Seafood Technologies, Inc. GSFD Peers
See (GSFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSFD | $0.11 | +0.00% | 1.8M | -0.15 | -$0.74 | N/A |
| WLMIF | $2.35 | -6.00% | 14.7B | 12.37 | $0.19 | +5.23% |
| WLMIY | $23.20 | +0.00% | 14.5B | 12.44 | $1.87 | +5.26% |
| MHGVY | $19.20 | +0.00% | 9.9B | 25.56 | $0.75 | +2.91% |
| MNHVF | $18.80 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 25.07 | $0.75 | +3.40% |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | +0.00% | 6.9B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +2.23% |
| SALRF | $43.95 | +0.00% | 5.9B | 32.80 | $1.34 | +0.49% |
| PPOKF | $0.34 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 34.00 | $0.01 | +2.50% |
| CPOUF | $0.70 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 7.00 | $0.10 | +4.27% |
| KLKBY | $4.28 | -0.12% | 5.4B | 28.57 | $0.15 | +3.20% |
Stock Comparison
GSFD vs WLMIF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while WLMIF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and WLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs WLMIY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while WLMIY trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs MHGVY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while MHGVY trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs MNHVF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while MNHVF trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and MNHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs KLKBF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and KLKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SALRF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SALRF trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs PPOKF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while PPOKF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and PPOKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CPOUF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CPOUF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CPOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs KLKBY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while KLKBY trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and KLKBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SALRY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SALRY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs CHPFF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CHPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs ACOPY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while ACOPY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and ACOPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs IDBHF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while IDBHF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and IDBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs BKFKF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while BKFKF trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 70.73. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and BKFKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs KNKZF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while KNKZF trades at $72.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and KNKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs GARPF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while GARPF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and GARPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs UPBMF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while UPBMF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and UPBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs ASTVF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while ASTVF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and ASTVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SLCJY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SLCJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs DNDPF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and DNDPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CTTQF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CTTQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs MRVSY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 984.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while MRVSY trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -16.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and MRVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs GRCLF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 955.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while GRCLF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and GRCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs GRGSF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 774.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while GRGSF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and GRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs EDESY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 754.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while EDESY trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and EDESY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs PTABF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 692.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while PTABF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and PTABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs AAYYY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while AAYYY trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is -1031.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and AAYYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs PPLFF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and PPLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs MHPSY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 567.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while MHPSY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and MHPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SISAF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 562.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SISAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs AAGRY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 558.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while AAGRY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and AAGRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs ASAGF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 554.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while ASAGF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs PPLFY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 484.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while PPLFY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and PPLFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs ORENF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 479.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while ORENF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and ORENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs AEPLF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while AEPLF trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and AEPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs BRCPF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and BRCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SLMCF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SLMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SLCJF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SLCJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SARDF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SARDF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SARDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SARDY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SARDY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SARDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs ALFDF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while ALFDF trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and ALFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SPZI Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SPZI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs UVPOF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while UVPOF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and UVPOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs DDEJF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while DDEJF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs STNT Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while STNT trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and STNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs DNDEF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs HLKKF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while HLKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and HLKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs NNUTU Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and NNUTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs AASZF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while AASZF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and AASZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs GARPY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while GARPY trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and GARPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CTUNF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CTUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CTUNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CLAD Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs PRCF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and PRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CMGHY Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs OPTHF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while OPTHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs PEASF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEASF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and PEASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CMGHF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CMGHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CMGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs HERB Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while HERB trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs GCEH Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs RSSFF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and RSSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs MINE Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs STEV Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs PNDHF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 915.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and PNDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs IGPFF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 463K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while IGPFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and IGPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs FLAF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 460.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLAF's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and FLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs GLGLF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 430K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while GLGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and GLGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs MSRM Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 323.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while MSRM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs HERF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 250K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while HERF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and HERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SHMP Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 247.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSFD.
GSFD vs TAER Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 233K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while TAER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and TAER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CHYI Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 56.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CHYI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CHYI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs OGAA Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and OGAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SUWN Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SUWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SUWN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs SIAF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and SIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs URYL Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and URYL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs MSAH Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while MSAH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and MSAH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs FFRMF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and FFRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs BIQIF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and BIQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CFPI Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 384. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CFPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CFPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs URBF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URBF's ROE of -56.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and URBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs KALRQ Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and KALRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs CAOX Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CAOX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while CAOX trades at $601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CAOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and CAOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs BYIN Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BYIN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while BYIN trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BYIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BYIN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and BYIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs TSLLF Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TSLLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while TSLLF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TSLLF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSLLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and TSLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSFD vs OCESP Comparison
GSFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSFD stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSFD is priced at $0.11, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSFD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSFD's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSFD and OCESP have similar daily volatility (0.00).