Grown Rogue International Inc.
Grown Rogue International Inc. (GRUSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GRUSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRUSF | $0.40 | +0.00% | 99.2M | -13.34 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| MKGAF | $134.65 | -1.72% | 58.5B | 17.69 | $7.61 | +1.86% |
| MKKGY | $26.67 | -0.52% | 55.1B | 17.49 | $1.52 | +1.88% |
| HLNCF | $4.90 | -0.51% | 44B | 23.33 | $0.21 | +1.78% |
| IPSEY | $32.42 | -1.76% | 42.9B | 26.15 | $1.24 | +0.80% |
| TKPHF | $27.05 | -8.31% | 42.6B | 60.11 | $0.45 | +4.92% |
| SDZNY | $59.42 | -1.35% | 25.6B | -2970.00 | -$0.02 | +1.14% |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| TEVJF | $14.00 | +0.00% | 16.1B | -12.17 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| SGIOY | $8.61 | +0.41% | 14.6B | 12.66 | $0.68 | +1.85% |
Stock Comparison
GRUSF vs MKGAF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while MKGAF trades at $134.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check MKGAF's competition here
GRUSF vs MKKGY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while MKKGY trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check MKKGY's competition here
GRUSF vs HLNCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HLNCF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HLNCF's competition here
GRUSF vs IPSEY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while IPSEY trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check IPSEY's competition here
GRUSF vs TKPHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while TKPHF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 60.11. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check TKPHF's competition here
GRUSF vs SDZNY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SDZNY trades at $59.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2970.00. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SDZNY's competition here
GRUSF vs ESALY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check ESALY's competition here
GRUSF vs TEVJF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while TEVJF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check TEVJF's competition here
GRUSF vs SGIOY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SGIOY trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SGIOY's competition here
GRUSF vs SGIOF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SGIOF trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SGIOF's competition here
GRUSF vs BIOVF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while BIOVF trades at $29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check BIOVF's competition here
GRUSF vs IPSEF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while IPSEF trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check IPSEF's competition here
GRUSF vs ESAIY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while ESAIY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check ESAIY's competition here
GRUSF vs SFOSF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SFOSF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SFOSF's competition here
GRUSF vs ESALF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while ESALF trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check ESALF's competition here
GRUSF vs HKMPF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HKMPF trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HKMPF's competition here
GRUSF vs HKMPY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HKMPY trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HKMPY's competition here
GRUSF vs GZPHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while GZPHF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check GZPHF's competition here
GRUSF vs SGFEF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SGFEF trades at $114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SGFEF's competition here
GRUSF vs WIBFF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check WIBFF's competition here
GRUSF vs HLBBF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HLBBF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HLBBF's competition here
GRUSF vs CHSYF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CHSYF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CHSYF's competition here
GRUSF vs LVZPF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check LVZPF's competition here
GRUSF vs ULIHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while ULIHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check ULIHF's competition here
GRUSF vs HLUBF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HLUBF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HLUBF's competition here
GRUSF vs APNHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while APNHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check APNHF's competition here
GRUSF vs SMDPY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SMDPY trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SMDPY's competition here
GRUSF vs INVVY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to INVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check INVVY's competition here
GRUSF vs APNHY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while APNHY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check APNHY's competition here
GRUSF vs HYPMY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HYPMY trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HYPMY's competition here
GRUSF vs IZQVF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to IZQVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check IZQVF's competition here
GRUSF vs DNPUF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while DNPUF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check DNPUF's competition here
GRUSF vs LBTSF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while LBTSF trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 102.77. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check LBTSF's competition here
GRUSF vs HMDCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HMDCF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HMDCF's competition here
GRUSF vs THCBF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check THCBF's competition here
GRUSF vs DMPHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check DMPHF's competition here
GRUSF vs HTSUF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HTSUF trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HTSUF's competition here
GRUSF vs LJUIF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check LJUIF's competition here
GRUSF vs ARSUF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while ARSUF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check ARSUF's competition here
GRUSF vs TSMRF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while TSMRF trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check TSMRF's competition here
GRUSF vs NPNKF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check NPNKF's competition here
GRUSF vs MITPF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check MITPF's competition here
GRUSF vs KARBF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to KARBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check KARBF's competition here
GRUSF vs EVOTF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while EVOTF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check EVOTF's competition here
GRUSF vs CASBF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CASBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CASBF's competition here
GRUSF vs GTBIF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while GTBIF trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check GTBIF's competition here
GRUSF vs SHEZF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SHEZF's competition here
GRUSF vs NPPNY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while NPPNY trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check NPPNY's competition here
GRUSF vs CHIZF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CHIZF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CHIZF's competition here
GRUSF vs SWGHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to SWGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SWGHF's competition here
GRUSF vs KSPHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while KSPHF trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check KSPHF's competition here
GRUSF vs CURLF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CURLF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CURLF's competition here
GRUSF vs GNMLF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while GNMLF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to GNMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check GNMLF's competition here
GRUSF vs KKPCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while KKPCF trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check KKPCF's competition here
GRUSF vs BIOGY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 960.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while BIOGY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check BIOGY's competition here
GRUSF vs SHPHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SHPHF's competition here
GRUSF vs TCNNF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 915.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while TCNNF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check TCNNF's competition here
GRUSF vs LVTTF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 901.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check LVTTF's competition here
GRUSF vs EVRRF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 897.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to EVRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check EVRRF's competition here
GRUSF vs NRXCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 851.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to NRXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check NRXCF's competition here
GRUSF vs TWAPF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check TWAPF's competition here
GRUSF vs SWDCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 773.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while SWDCF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check SWDCF's competition here
GRUSF vs CSWYF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CSWYF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CSWYF's competition here
GRUSF vs NIKA Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 708.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while NIKA trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check NIKA's competition here
GRUSF vs TRXPF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to TRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check TRXPF's competition here
GRUSF vs YIHCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to YIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check YIHCF's competition here
GRUSF vs TRSSF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check TRSSF's competition here
GRUSF vs ELTP Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 578.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while ELTP trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -26.99. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check ELTP's competition here
GRUSF vs AIHLF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 566M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while AIHLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check AIHLF's competition here
GRUSF vs PKBFF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 549.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check PKBFF's competition here
GRUSF vs CCHWF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -7.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CCHWF's competition here
GRUSF vs BOIRF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 494.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while BOIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check BOIRF's competition here
GRUSF vs PEXXF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to PEXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check PEXXF's competition here
GRUSF vs KHTRF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 448.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while KHTRF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 64.34. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check KHTRF's competition here
GRUSF vs AGYTF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check AGYTF's competition here
GRUSF vs HUMDF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 404M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HUMDF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to HUMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HUMDF's competition here
GRUSF vs GLASF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while GLASF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -61.11. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check GLASF's competition here
GRUSF vs BHCCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 271.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check BHCCF's competition here
GRUSF vs CRLBF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CRLBF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CRLBF's competition here
GRUSF vs CPHRF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CPHRF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CPHRF's competition here
GRUSF vs VRNOF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while VRNOF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check VRNOF's competition here
GRUSF vs PLNHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check PLNHF's competition here
GRUSF vs PHCUF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while PHCUF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is 600.00. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check PHCUF's competition here
GRUSF vs CBWTF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 141.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CBWTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CBWTF's competition here
GRUSF vs COPHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check COPHF's competition here
GRUSF vs STMH Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, STMH has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while STMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas STMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to STMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to STMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check STMH's competition here
GRUSF vs NWPN Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check NWPN's competition here
GRUSF vs LOVFF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while LOVFF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check LOVFF's competition here
GRUSF vs HLTRF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while HLTRF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check HLTRF's competition here
GRUSF vs LPCUF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check LPCUF's competition here
GRUSF vs CNVCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to CNVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check CNVCF's competition here
GRUSF vs JUSHF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while JUSHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check JUSHF's competition here
GRUSF vs BIOYF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while BIOYF trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to BIOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check BIOYF's competition here
GRUSF vs AAWH Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while AAWH trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to AAWH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check AAWH's competition here
GRUSF vs LRDSF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check LRDSF's competition here
GRUSF vs ABSCF Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while ABSCF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check ABSCF's competition here
GRUSF vs DUTV Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, DUTV has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while DUTV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas DUTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DUTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to DUTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check DUTV's competition here
GRUSF vs EOFBY Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, EOFBY has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while EOFBY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas EOFBY's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to EOFBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is more volatile compared to EOFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check EOFBY's competition here
GRUSF vs PLNH Comparison July 2025
GRUSF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRUSF stands at 99.2M. In comparison, PLNH has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRUSF is priced at $0.40, while PLNH trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRUSF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.34, whereas PLNH's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, GRUSF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PLNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRUSF is less volatile compared to PLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRUSF.Check PLNH's competition here