Gold River Productions, Inc.
Gold River Productions, Inc. GRPS Peers
See (GRPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPS | $0.00 | -50.00% | 156.7K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MKGAF | $135.44 | -0.60% | 58.9B | 18.28 | $7.41 | +1.60% |
| MKKGY | $26.39 | -1.68% | 56.7B | 17.71 | $1.49 | +2.19% |
| HLNCF | $5.27 | -2.30% | 47.4B | 25.08 | $0.21 | +2.07% |
| TKPHF | $28.27 | +1.29% | 44.5B | 60.15 | $0.47 | +4.71% |
| IPSEY | $29.84 | +0.64% | 39.5B | 24.46 | $1.22 | +0.75% |
| SDZNY | $52.43 | -1.75% | 22.6B | -2621.25 | -$0.02 | +1.29% |
| TEVJF | $17.80 | N/A | 20.4B | -15.48 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| SGIOY | $8.58 | +0.59% | 14.6B | 12.43 | $0.69 | +0.82% |
Stock Comparison
GRPS vs MKGAF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while MKGAF trades at $135.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs MKKGY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while MKKGY trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HLNCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HLNCF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs TKPHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while TKPHF trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 60.15. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and TKPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs IPSEY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while IPSEY trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and IPSEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs SDZNY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SDZNY trades at $52.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2621.25. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs TEVJF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while TEVJF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs ESALY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs SGIOY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SGIOY trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs SGIOF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SGIOF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs BIOVF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while BIOVF trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs IPSEF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while IPSEF trades at $125.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs ESALF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ESALF trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and ESALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs ESAIY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ESAIY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs SFOSF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SFOSF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HKMPY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HKMPY trades at $56.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HKMPF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HKMPF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs GZPHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while GZPHF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs WIBFF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HLBBF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HLBBF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs LVZPF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HLUBF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HLUBF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs APNHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while APNHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs INVVY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and INVVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs APNHY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while APNHY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and APNHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs HYPMY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HYPMY trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and HYPMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs IZQVF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and IZQVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs HMDCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs DNPUF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while DNPUF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs ULIHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ULIHF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs THCBF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CHSYF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CHSYF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and CHSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs TSMRF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while TSMRF trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and TSMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs DMPHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and DMPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs HTSUF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HTSUF trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs LJUIF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and LJUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs LBTSF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while LBTSF trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 150.17. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs ARSUF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ARSUF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and ARSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs NPNKF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs NPPNY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while NPPNY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and NPPNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs SMDPY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SMDPY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and SMDPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs MITPF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs SHEZF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs YIHCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and YIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs KARBF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and KARBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs EVOTF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while EVOTF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CHIZF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CHIZF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs GTBIF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while GTBIF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs KSPHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while KSPHF trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs SWGHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and SWGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs GNMLF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while GNMLF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and GNMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs CASBF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 985.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CASBF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs KKPCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 980.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while KKPCF trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs SHPHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs LVTTF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 897.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs EVRRF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 893.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and EVRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs BIOGY Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while BIOGY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs NRXCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 846.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and NRXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs TWAPF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CSWYF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CSWYF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs ELTP Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 721.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ELTP trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs NIKA Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 708.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while NIKA trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and NIKA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs TCNNF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 703.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while TCNNF trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs TRXPF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and TRXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs SWDCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SWDCF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CURLF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 602M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CURLF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs TRSSF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs SGFEF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 536.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while SGFEF trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CCHWF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -7.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs AIHLF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 507.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while AIHLF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs BOIRF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 494.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while BOIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs PEXXF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and PEXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs KHTRF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 443.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while KHTRF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 63.54. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs AGYTF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs PKBFF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 292.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs ABTI Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ABTI has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ABTI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTI's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ABTI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and ABTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs GLASF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while GLASF trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -55.44. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs BHCCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CPHRF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CPHRF trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs PLNHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs VRNOF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while VRNOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CBSTF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CBSTF has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CBSTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBSTF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CBSTF's ROE of +10.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CBSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CRLBF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CRLBF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HUMDF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HUMDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and HUMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs PHCUF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while PHCUF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is 524.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and PHCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs COPHF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HLTRF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HLTRF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and HLTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs LPCUF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and LPCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs CNVCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and CNVCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs BIOYF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while BIOYF trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and BIOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs NWPN Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs HBRM Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, HBRM has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while HBRM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to HBRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to HBRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs DUTV Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, DUTV has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while DUTV trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to DUTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to DUTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs LRDSF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs GRUSF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while GRUSF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs GBLP Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, GBLP has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while GBLP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to GBLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS and GBLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRPS vs LOVFF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while LOVFF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs CBWTF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while CBWTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.
GRPS vs ABSCF Comparison
GRPS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRPS stands at 156.7K. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRPS is priced at $0.00, while ABSCF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRPS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, GRPS's ROE is +2.18%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRPS is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRPS.