Greenlane Renewables Inc.
Greenlane Renewables Inc. GRNWF Peers
See (GRNWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRNWF | $0.06 | +1.69% | 9.41M | -6.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KTWIY | $71.96 | -2.76% | 4.05B | 29.37 | $2.45 | N/A |
| KTWIF | $34.67 | +2.27% | 3.89B | 28.42 | $1.22 | +1.80% |
| MMNNF | $19.49 | -0.56% | 3.56B | 35.44 | $0.55 | +0.37% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | +25.16% | 2.44B | 16.78 | $3.16 | +1.85% |
| UMICF | $9.81 | +5.06% | 2.36B | -1.44 | -$6.82 | +5.41% |
| UMICY | $2.31 | -0.22% | 2.22B | -1.35 | -$1.71 | +5.44% |
| CCVTF | $0.94 | N/A | 1.68B | 5.85 | $0.16 | +4.13% |
| HIZOF | $6.59 | -0.90% | 1.11B | 7.32 | $0.90 | +0.02% |
| TKUMF | $9.18 | N/A | 701.45M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +2.16% |
Stock Comparison
GRNWF vs KTWIY Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while KTWIY trades at $71.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and KTWIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs KTWIF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while KTWIF trades at $34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs MMNNF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while MMNNF trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to MMNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs ORGJF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs UMICF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while UMICF trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and UMICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs UMICY Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while UMICY trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs CCVTF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while CCVTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to CCVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs HIZOF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while HIZOF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs TKUMF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 701.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and TKUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs MTWTF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and MTWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs PVARF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 423.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while PVARF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs GRPRF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 311.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while GRPRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and GRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs AKCCF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 169.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while AKCCF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs ACTHF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and ACTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs MEEC Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.11M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MEEC's ROE of -36.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs SSHPF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs EMFGF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 39.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while EMFGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs SREMF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 33.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while SREMF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs YEWTF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.13M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs SCAXF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 25.10M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while SCAXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs PGTK Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while PGTK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs BIRMF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 23.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while BIRMF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs TMGEF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 12.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while TMGEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to TMGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs INTWF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 12.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while INTWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and INTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs QUTIF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 6.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while QUTIF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and QUTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs DNDDF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs QWTR Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 5.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while QWTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and QWTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs BNET Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while BNET trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs AETLF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and AETLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs COSLF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs DCTIF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while DCTIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and DCTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs DRFS Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and DRFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs GOGR Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while GOGR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and GOGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs KNOS Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs MGON Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while MGON trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and MGON have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs ENPRF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs DOCKF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 2.22M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while DOCKF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs EAWD Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 1.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs OWUV Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs RAKR Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 629541.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while RAKR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and RAKR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs ATMFF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 527959.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ATMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs LQWC Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 488387.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and LQWC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs ATGVF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 462848.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ATGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs TGTMF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 458071.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs SFBE Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427149.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SFBE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and SFBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs GWTR Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 343470.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs GMEV Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 270544.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to GMEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs TNKE Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265933.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and TNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs EESH Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 110797.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while EESH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs WTII Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 92420.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and WTII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs XLPI Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 86265.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and XLPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs PCTL Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80560.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and PCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs ESFS Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75086.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs MSBN Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53168.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs GLEC Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 49990.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and GLEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs AKMYF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35252.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs ETII Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26205.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ETII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and ETII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs WTNW Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24267.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and WTNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs SINX Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 18953.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs GCHK Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16136.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and GCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs UVFT Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13416.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and UVFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs PURA Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11414.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs SMVS Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8523.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and SMVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs GRCO Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8291.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and GRCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs SYEV Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 7992.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to SYEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs CGYV Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6210.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CGYV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and CGYV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs ROBXF Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5605.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs EMHI Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4017.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and EMHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs RENO Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and RENO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs EAUI Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2858.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EAUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and EAUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs MPML Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1001.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF and MPML have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRNWF vs HTHL Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.
GRNWF vs FQCC Comparison
GRNWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNWF stands at 9.41M. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4.00. Regarding current trading prices, GRNWF is priced at $0.06, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNWF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNWF is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNWF.