Organization of Football Prognostics S.A.
Organization of Football Prognostics S.A. GRKZF Peers
See (GRKZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRKZF | $21.00 | -5.41% | 7.5B | 13.46 | $1.56 | +7.60% |
| PDYPY | $103.75 | +0.50% | 36.7B | -494.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| PDYPF | $205.00 | +1.99% | 36.3B | -476.74 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| ARLUF | $41.50 | -0.46% | 26B | 37.05 | $1.12 | +0.87% |
| GXYYY | $21.55 | +0.70% | 18.9B | 16.84 | $1.28 | +0.38% |
| GXYEF | $3.80 | +5.56% | 16.6B | 14.62 | $0.26 | +0.43% |
| SCHYY | $20.19 | -1.37% | 16.3B | 15.65 | $1.29 | +1.33% |
| SCHYF | $1.85 | +2.78% | 15B | 14.23 | $0.13 | +13.89% |
| EVVTY | $67.92 | +0.03% | 14B | 10.14 | $6.70 | +4.28% |
| EVGGF | $68.27 | -0.49% | 13.5B | 10.20 | $6.69 | +4.56% |
Stock Comparison
GRKZF vs PDYPY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PDYPY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PDYPY trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PDYPY's P/E ratio is -494.05. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PDYPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to PDYPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs PDYPF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PDYPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PDYPF trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PDYPF's P/E ratio is -476.74. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PDYPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to PDYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs ARLUF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ARLUF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while ARLUF trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas ARLUF's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ARLUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and ARLUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs GXYYY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GXYYY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GXYYY trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GXYYY's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GXYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GXYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GXYEF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GXYEF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GXYEF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GXYEF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GXYEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and GXYEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs SCHYY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SCHYY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SCHYY trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SCHYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SCHYY's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to SCHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs SCHYF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SCHYF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SCHYF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SCHYF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SCHYF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to SCHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs EVVTY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EVVTY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EVVTY trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EVVTY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EVVTY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to EVVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs EVGGF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EVGGF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EVGGF trades at $68.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EVGGF's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EVGGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to EVGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GOFPY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GOFPY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GOFPY trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GOFPY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GOFPY's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GOFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs LTRCF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LTRCF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while LTRCF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas LTRCF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LTRCF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to LTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GIGNF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GIGNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GIGNF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GIGNF's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GIGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and GIGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs LFDJF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LFDJF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while LFDJF trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas LFDJF's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LFDJF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to LFDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GMVHF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMVHF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GMVHF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GMVHF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GMVHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GMVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GIGNY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GIGNY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GIGNY trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GIGNY's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GIGNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GIGNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GMVHY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMVHY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GMVHY trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GMVHY's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GMVHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GMVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs MCHVF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MCHVF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while MCHVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas MCHVF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MCHVF's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to MCHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs PYTCY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PYTCY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PYTCY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PYTCY's P/E ratio is 53.42. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PYTCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and PYTCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs WYNMY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WYNMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while WYNMY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas WYNMY's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WYNMY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to WYNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs WYNMF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WYNMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while WYNMF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas WYNMF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WYNMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and WYNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs SKXJF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SKXJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SKXJF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SKXJF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SKXJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to SKXJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs BMRMF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BMRMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while BMRMF trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas BMRMF's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BMRMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to BMRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GEBHY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GEBHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GEBHY trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GEBHY's P/E ratio is 39.56. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GEBHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GEBHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GEBEY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GEBEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GEBEY trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GEBEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GEBEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GEBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GEBHF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GEBHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GEBHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GEBHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GEBHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GEBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs KNDGF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KNDGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while KNDGF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas KNDGF's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to KNDGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and KNDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs GMALF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMALF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GMALF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GMALF's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GMALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GMALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs SJMHY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SJMHY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SJMHY trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SJMHY's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SJMHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to SJMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs NGCRF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NGCRF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while NGCRF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas NGCRF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NGCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to NGCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs SJMHF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SJMHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SJMHF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SJMHF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SJMHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to SJMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs NGCRY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NGCRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while NGCRY trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas NGCRY's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NGCRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and NGCRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs BLBRF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BLBRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while BLBRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas BLBRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BLBRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to BLBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GMALY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMALY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GMALY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GMALY's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GMALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GMALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs BVHBB Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BVHBB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while BVHBB trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas BVHBB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BVHBB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and BVHBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs PYTCF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PYTCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PYTCF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PYTCF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PYTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to PYTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs MDEVF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MDEVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while MDEVF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas MDEVF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MDEVF's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to MDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs MDEVY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MDEVY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while MDEVY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas MDEVY's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MDEVY's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to MDEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs TABCF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TABCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while TABCF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas TABCF's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to TABCF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to TABCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs TACBY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TACBY has a market cap of 972.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while TACBY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas TACBY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to TACBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and TACBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs BJSAF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BJSAF has a market cap of 806.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while BJSAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas BJSAF's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BJSAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to BJSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs IRLTY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IRLTY has a market cap of 784.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while IRLTY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas IRLTY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to IRLTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and IRLTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs IRLTF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and IRLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs RANKF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RANKF has a market cap of 501.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while RANKF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas RANKF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RANKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to RANKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs MCHVY Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MCHVY has a market cap of 464.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while MCHVY trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas MCHVY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MCHVY's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and MCHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs SKYZF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SKYZF has a market cap of 463.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SKYZF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SKYZF's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SKYZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and SKYZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs PBKOF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PBKOF has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PBKOF trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PBKOF's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PBKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to PBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs KMBIF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KMBIF has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while KMBIF trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas KMBIF's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to KMBIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to KMBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs EIHDF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EIHDF has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EIHDF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EIHDF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EIHDF's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and EIHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs PDSSF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PDSSF has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PDSSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PDSSF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PDSSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to PDSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs PBTHF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PBTHF has a market cap of 261.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PBTHF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PBTHF's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PBTHF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to PBTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs AGTEF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AGTEF has a market cap of 232.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while AGTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas AGTEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AGTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to AGTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs EHGRF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EHGRF has a market cap of 200.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EHGRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EHGRF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EHGRF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to EHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs AINSF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AINSF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while AINSF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas AINSF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AINSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to AINSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs PSDMF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PSDMF has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PSDMF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PSDMF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PSDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to PSDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs GHIFF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GHIFF has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GHIFF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GHIFF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GHIFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and GHIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs MALDF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MALDF has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while MALDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas MALDF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MALDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and MALDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs PMKRF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PMKRF has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while PMKRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas PMKRF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PMKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and PMKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs RCTUF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RCTUF has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while RCTUF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas RCTUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RCTUF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and RCTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs ARHN Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ARHN has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while ARHN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas ARHN's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ARHN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and ARHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs GLXZ Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GLXZ has a market cap of 70.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GLXZ trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GLXZ's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GLXZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GLXZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs CTTMF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CTTMF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while CTTMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas CTTMF's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CTTMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and CTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs TBTC Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TBTC has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while TBTC trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas TBTC's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to TBTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and TBTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs BRRE Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRRE has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while BRRE trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas BRRE's P/E ratio is -731.65. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BRRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to BRRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs JPOTF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JPOTF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while JPOTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas JPOTF's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to JPOTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to JPOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs JKPTF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JKPTF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while JKPTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas JKPTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to JKPTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and JKPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs TNTAF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TNTAF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while TNTAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas TNTAF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to TNTAF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to TNTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs SPOZF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SPOZF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SPOZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SPOZF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SPOZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to SPOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs NWGIW Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NWGIW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while NWGIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas NWGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NWGIW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and NWGIW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs CETMF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CETMF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while CETMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas CETMF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CETMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and CETMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs RYWCF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RYWCF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while RYWCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas RYWCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RYWCF's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and RYWCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs LTFD Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LTFD has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while LTFD trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas LTFD's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LTFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and LTFD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs LUKEF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LUKEF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while LUKEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas LUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LUKEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to LUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs ITMZF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ITMZF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while ITMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas ITMZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ITMZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to ITMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs RVLCF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RVLCF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while RVLCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas RVLCF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RVLCF's ROE of +3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and RVLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs THRSF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, THRSF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while THRSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas THRSF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to THRSF's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to THRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs FCNE Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FCNE has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while FCNE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas FCNE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to FCNE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to FCNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs BRVO Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRVO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while BRVO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas BRVO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BRVO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and BRVO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs RVRVF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RVRVF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while RVRVF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas RVRVF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RVRVF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and RVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs GMER Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMER has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GMER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GMER's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GMER's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to GMER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs ELRA Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ELRA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while ELRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas ELRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ELRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and ELRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs SWCC Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SWCC has a market cap of 758.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while SWCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas SWCC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SWCC's ROE of +6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to SWCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs BYNEF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BYNEF has a market cap of 693.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while BYNEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas BYNEF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BYNEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to BYNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs WNRS Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WNRS has a market cap of 277.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while WNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas WNRS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WNRS's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to WNRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs FUNFF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FUNFF has a market cap of 215.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while FUNFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas FUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to FUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to FUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs WPFH Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 156.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while WPFH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs VETIF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VETIF has a market cap of 101.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while VETIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas VETIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to VETIF's ROE of +9.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and VETIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs EXPH Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EXPH has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EXPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EXPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EXPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to EXPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs EMBR Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EMBR has a market cap of 32.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EMBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EMBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EMBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and EMBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs EPGG Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EPGG has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EPGG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EPGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EPGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and EPGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs NTGL Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NTGL has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while NTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas NTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NTGL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and NTGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs ELYS Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ELYS has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while ELYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas ELYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ELYS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and ELYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs KNBA Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KNBA has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while KNBA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas KNBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to KNBA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF is less volatile compared to KNBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRKZF.
GRKZF vs CGAM Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CGAM has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while CGAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas CGAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CGAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and CGAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs ULSP Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ULSP has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while ULSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas ULSP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ULSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and ULSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs ROBK Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ROBK has a market cap of 612. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while ROBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas ROBK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ROBK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and ROBK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs LTTGF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LTTGF has a market cap of 128. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while LTTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas LTTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LTTGF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and LTTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs AMRA Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AMRA has a market cap of 32. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while AMRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas AMRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AMRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and AMRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs GIGI Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GIGI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while GIGI trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas GIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GIGI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and GIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRKZF vs EVGEF Comparison
GRKZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRKZF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EVGEF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRKZF is priced at $21.00, while EVGEF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRKZF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.46, whereas EVGEF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, GRKZF's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EVGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRKZF and EVGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).