Geopulse Exploration, Inc.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 47.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while EXPGY trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 40.31. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 46.55B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while EXPGF trades at $50.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to EXPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while SGSOF trades at $107.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to SGSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 19.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while SGSOY trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while BVVBY trades at $64.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 13.88B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while BVRDF trades at $30.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to BVRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while BYCRF trades at $34.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to BYCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while CPBLF trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 953.00. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to CPBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, DKSHF has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while DKSHF trades at $66.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKSHF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DKSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to DKSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while IPSOF trades at $50.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to IPSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 592.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while EUBG trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 432.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to BGPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, AYAG has a market cap of 126.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while AYAG trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAG's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AYAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to AYAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 58.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while KMNCF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to KMNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 49.17M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while FLCX trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLCX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to FLCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, MANOF has a market cap of 40.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while MANOF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANOF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MANOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to MANOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 2.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while VIZC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to VIZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while AIMH trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while INTO trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to INTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while DFCO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DFCO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to DFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while ADHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while BLDV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while DCAC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DCAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to DCAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 553747.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while SGDH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to SGDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 551107.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while MRDH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to MRDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, AERS has a market cap of 449602.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while AERS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERS's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AERS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to AERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 411095.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while QPRC trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to QPRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 280980.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while FUGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FUGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to FUGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 278535.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while DEQI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to DEQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 212916.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while GTVH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GTVH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 204381.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of +15.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to AMMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, LGBS has a market cap of 140422.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while LGBS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to LGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101926.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to SYNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87511.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while MSYN trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 81426.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while ENCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 75149.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while CSLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to CSLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72012.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while ITEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ITEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to ITEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, STWC has a market cap of 8862.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while STWC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STWC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to STWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 352.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while PCHK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is less volatile compared to PCHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.

GPLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GPLS stands at 6.29M. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141.00. Regarding current trading prices, GPLS is priced at $0.04, while HDST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GPLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GPLS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPLS is more volatile compared to HDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPLS.