Goldrea Resources Corp.
Goldrea Resources Corp. GORAF Peers
See (GORAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GORAF | $0.01 | N/A | 1.3M | -1.10 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.21 | -5.43% | 122.9B | 10.81 | $2.24 | +4.85% |
| RTNTF | $74.31 | N/A | 104.7B | 10.51 | $7.07 | +3.16% |
| RTPPF | $57.12 | -0.98% | 97.1B | 8.08 | $7.07 | +6.97% |
| GLCNF | $3.99 | +2.31% | 47.6B | -30.69 | -$0.13 | +2.95% |
| GLNCY | $7.86 | +0.90% | 47.5B | -30.23 | -$0.26 | +2.76% |
| GMBXF | $5.58 | -0.89% | 43.4B | 11.63 | $0.48 | +4.41% |
| AAUKF | $28.50 | -3.88% | 39.3B | -9.93 | -$2.87 | +2.14% |
| FSUGY | $20.53 | -0.29% | 31.6B | 8.11 | $2.53 | +8.82% |
| NGLOY | $14.53 | N/A | 31B | -10.09 | -$1.44 | +1.89% |
Stock Comparison
GORAF vs BHPLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while BHPLF trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs RTNTF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while RTNTF trades at $74.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs RTPPF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while RTPPF trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs GLCNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while GLCNF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.69. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs GLNCY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while GLNCY trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs GMBXF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while GMBXF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs AAUKF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AAUKF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs FSUGY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while FSUGY trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs NGLOY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while NGLOY trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs FSUMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while FSUMF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and FSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs CMCLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while CMCLF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs TCKRF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while TCKRF trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 794.80. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs IPOAF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while IPOAF trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs IVPAF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while IVPAF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs BOLIF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs JXMNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs BDNNY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while BDNNY trades at $61.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs SHTLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ZNWLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ZNWLF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ZNWLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ZNWLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ZNWLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and ZNWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs ABML Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs STMNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs SMMYY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while SMMYY trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.99. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs LYSDY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while LYSDY trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 146.88. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs LYSCF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while LYSCF trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 146.25. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs PUTKF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs PUTKY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKY trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs NILSY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs PAEKY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs JMXXF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while JMXXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and JMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs MLYF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MALRY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MALRY trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs FLMMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs PILBF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PILBF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs CHZQ Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs MALRF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs NGXXF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while NGXXF trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.04. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs IPGDF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while IPGDF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs PTNDY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs MIMTF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs PTNDF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs IIDDY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs NICMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs AZZVF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs POTRF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, POTRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while POTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas POTRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to POTRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to POTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs AFBOF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs DWMNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs SOUHY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while SOUHY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.62. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ERMAF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ERMAY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs DETRF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while DETRF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs ADTLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ADTLF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ADMLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ADMLF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs LINRF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while LINRF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.80. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs AZRMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs AUSDF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs ILKAF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ILKAY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs BQSSF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while BQSSF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs FMCXF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 992.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while FMCXF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -58.82. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MFRVF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 967.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MFRVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ATUSF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 924.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ATUSF trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs STTSY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs TAOFF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 893.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while TAOFF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs AFMJF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 816.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs AMVMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AMVMF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -57.89. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ALMTF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ALMTF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs CTJHF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MJDLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 559.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MJDLF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs PXMFF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 554.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs VULNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 537.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while VULNF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs PKREF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 537.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs TTNNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs OSTTF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs FGOVF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 469.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while FGOVF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -88.74. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MCRZF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MCHHF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs BIRNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs NQMIY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs MNXMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 379.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MNXMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.13. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs REEMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 377M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while REEMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.35. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs AUMTF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while AUMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs CTJHY Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs CGMLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while CGMLF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -22.43. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs KMRPF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MLXEF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and MLXEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs FWEDF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while FWEDF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs SVMLF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 306.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while SVMLF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ERLFF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 306M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ERLFF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.51. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs ARAFF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs SLGGF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and SLGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs PMETF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while PMETF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -60.48. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs BSSMF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs ERDCF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 264.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while ERDCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -72.40. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs LRSRF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MGMNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MGMNF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs LTSRF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 251.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs STQNF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GORAF vs NTCPF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while NTCPF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -32.01. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GORAF.
GORAF vs MMILF Comparison
GORAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GORAF stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GORAF is priced at $0.01, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GORAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GORAF's ROE is +0.78%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GORAF and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).