Good Energy Group PLC
Good Energy Group PLC GOOD.L Peers
See (GOOD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOD.L | £489.00 | +0.51% | 90.5M | 19.56 | £0.25 | +0.22% |
| 0R3I.L | £100.05 | +0.41% | 11.3B | -20.66 | -£4.84 | N/A |
| DRX.L | £657.00 | -0.15% | 2.3B | 4.87 | £1.35 | +3.96% |
| 0QOH.L | £29.50 | +0.34% | 976.6M | 13.19 | £2.24 | N/A |
| GRP.L | £0.75 | +1.91% | 832.8M | 18.70 | £0.04 | +9.03% |
| 0E9V.L | £42.90 | -0.69% | 598.7M | 17.02 | £2.52 | N/A |
| 0EIB.L | £1.06 | N/A | 464M | 211.20 | £0.01 | +1.99% |
| 0GHX.L | £4.30 | N/A | 165.4M | -1.60 | -£2.69 | N/A |
| IES.L | £16.00 | -0.66% | 70.5M | -2.29 | -£0.07 | N/A |
| 0QQT.L | £54.00 | +0.93% | 55.7M | 12.41 | £4.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GOOD.L vs 0R3I.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, 0R3I.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while 0R3I.L trades at £100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas 0R3I.L's P/E ratio is -20.66. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0R3I.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to 0R3I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs DRX.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, DRX.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while DRX.L trades at £657.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas DRX.L's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DRX.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to DRX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs 0QOH.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, 0QOH.L has a market cap of 976.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while 0QOH.L trades at £29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas 0QOH.L's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0QOH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L and 0QOH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GOOD.L vs GRP.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, GRP.L has a market cap of 832.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while GRP.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas GRP.L's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to GRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs 0E9V.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, 0E9V.L has a market cap of 598.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while 0E9V.L trades at £42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas 0E9V.L's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0E9V.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to 0E9V.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs 0EIB.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, 0EIB.L has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while 0EIB.L trades at £1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas 0EIB.L's P/E ratio is 211.20. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0EIB.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to 0EIB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs 0GHX.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, 0GHX.L has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while 0GHX.L trades at £4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas 0GHX.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0GHX.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to 0GHX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs IES.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, IES.L has a market cap of 70.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while IES.L trades at £16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas IES.L's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IES.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to IES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs 0QQT.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, 0QQT.L has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while 0QQT.L trades at £54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas 0QQT.L's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0QQT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L and 0QQT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GOOD.L vs 0QQG.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, 0QQG.L has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while 0QQG.L trades at £44.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas 0QQG.L's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0QQG.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to 0QQG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs ATOM.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, ATOM.L has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while ATOM.L trades at £58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas ATOM.L's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ATOM.L's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to ATOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs PHE.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, PHE.L has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while PHE.L trades at £0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas PHE.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PHE.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to PHE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs CPH2.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, CPH2.L has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while CPH2.L trades at £6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas CPH2.L's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CPH2.L's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to CPH2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs SAE.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, SAE.L has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while SAE.L trades at £2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas SAE.L's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAE.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to SAE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs MAST.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, MAST.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while MAST.L trades at £1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas MAST.L's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAST.L's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to MAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs PNPL.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, PNPL.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while PNPL.L trades at £2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas PNPL.L's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PNPL.L's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L and PNPL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GOOD.L vs NZI.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, NZI.L has a market cap of 819.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while NZI.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas NZI.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NZI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L and NZI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GOOD.L vs CODX.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, CODX.L has a market cap of 467.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while CODX.L trades at £5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas CODX.L's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CODX.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L and CODX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GOOD.L vs PPG.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, PPG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while PPG.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas PPG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PPG.L's ROE of +13.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to PPG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.
GOOD.L vs ZOE.L Comparison
GOOD.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOOD.L stands at 90.5M. In comparison, ZOE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOOD.L is priced at £489.00, while ZOE.L trades at £37.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.56, whereas ZOE.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GOOD.L's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZOE.L's ROE of -6.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GOOD.L is less volatile compared to ZOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOOD.L.