GiveMePower Corporation
GiveMePower Corporation GMPW Peers
See (GMPW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMPW | $0.02 | -3.63% | 709.4K | -1.62 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +7.75% | 121.8B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +16.47% |
| MQBKY | $137.77 | +0.60% | 53.1B | 19.19 | $7.18 | +2.99% |
| CIIHY | $25.00 | -0.16% | 49.6B | 11.90 | $2.10 | +4.01% |
| CIIHF | $2.12 | -16.86% | 41.6B | 10.10 | $0.21 | +4.73% |
| MCQEF | $106.00 | -16.06% | 38.7B | 14.74 | $7.19 | +4.21% |
| GUOSF | $1.18 | N/A | 32.1B | 7.87 | $0.15 | +7.10% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | N/A | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +27.26% |
| NRSCF | $5.35 | N/A | 15.8B | 6.86 | $0.78 | +0.05% |
Stock Comparison
GMPW vs IBKKF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs HAITY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs MQBKY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while MQBKY trades at $137.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CIIHY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CIIHY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CIIHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CIIHF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CIIHF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs MCQEF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while MCQEF trades at $106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs GUOSF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while GUOSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and GUOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs HTNGF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs NRSCF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while NRSCF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and NRSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CNICF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CNICF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CNICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CMSQY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CMSQY trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs HUATF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and HUATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CMSQF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CMSQF trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CMSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs DSEEY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DSEEY trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs DSECF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DSECF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs WSOUF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs BRPHF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs IVTJF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while IVTJF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and IVTJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs IGGHY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while IGGHY trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and IGGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs IVTJY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and IVTJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CLPE Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CLPE trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1400.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs IGGRF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while IGGRF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and IGGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CGXYY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CGXYY trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 199.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs LTSAP Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while LTSAP trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs PLSQF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs TCAPF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while TCAPF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and TCAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs LTSA Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CBGPF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CBGPF trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs FNNTF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while FNNTF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs NHMAF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while NHMAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and NHMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs MNXBF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while MNXBF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -35.62. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and MNXBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs MAUSY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs DEFTF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CFNCF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs LKADF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CNSRF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 725.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CNSRF trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CCORF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 698.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CCORF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -26.19. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CCORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CBGPY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 678.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CBGPY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs ARCNF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 634.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and ARCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs DGTLF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 614.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DGTLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs PHIGW Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 593.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs PHIG Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 583.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while PHIG trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and PHIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CAGPF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 523.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CAGPF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -86.36. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CSCHF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CSCHF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs NAGGF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CYFRF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 328.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CYFRF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 71.48. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs ABGSF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CESTY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CESTY trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CESTF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CESTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs APPCF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs ABIT Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs NPPTF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while NPPTF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 60.05. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs PNPFF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 136.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while PNPFF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and PNPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs GEVI Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while GEVI trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs OZFRY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while OZFRY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and OZFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs HAFG Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while HAFG trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs STGC Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CURN Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CURN trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs XAUMF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while XAUMF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and XAUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs GBCHF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and GBCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs BKLIF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BKLIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and BKLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs UFFRF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs DMGGF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DMGGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CBTTF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs BBKCF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CMZZF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CRMZ Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CRMZ trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CFLSF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs EBML Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs DYNA Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs ARBKF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs FFTTF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while FFTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs SMURF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs BCNWF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs FDCT Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while FDCT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs TRAA Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while TRAA trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs FWAV Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs BULT Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BULT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and BULT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs AVFCF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and AVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs MATEF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs DPXCF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and DPXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs ABSOF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs BTCWF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BTCWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs IHLDF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while IHLDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and IHLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CCPUF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CCPUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs ITEX Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while ITEX trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and ITEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs BLVDF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CSTXF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CSTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs DBKSF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while DBKSF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and DBKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs HYHDF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while HYHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and HYHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs AAMTF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and AAMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs PHIL Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs BIDCF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BIDCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and BIDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs OSHDF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while OSHDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and OSHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs BZRD Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMPW vs CRKR Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs BKBLF Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while BKBLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs IFXY Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, IFXY has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while IFXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IFXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IFXY's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW is less volatile compared to IFXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMPW.
GMPW vs CBTC Comparison
GMPW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMPW stands at 709.4K. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMPW is priced at $0.02, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMPW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMPW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMPW and CBTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).