Golar LNG Partners LP
Golar LNG Partners LP GMLPF Peers
See (GMLPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMLPF | $1.38 | +10.00% | 97.3K | N/A | N/A | +119.32% |
EBRGF | $12.60 | +0.80% | 100.7B | N/A | N/A | +12.20% |
EBBNF | $22.80 | +0.12% | 100B | 10.27 | $2.22 | +6.42% |
ENBGF | $17.00 | +2.44% | 99.4B | N/A | N/A | +9.56% |
ENNPF | $15.69 | -5.02% | 94.9B | N/A | N/A | +10.03% |
TCANF | $5.39 | -36.59% | 52.1B | 2.12 | $2.54 | +8.87% |
EBGEF | $23.80 | -0.37% | 51.9B | 10.73 | $2.22 | +9.59% |
TNCAF | $11.35 | N/A | 51.2B | 4.47 | $2.54 | +13.01% |
EBBGF | $23.45 | -1.71% | 51.1B | 10.57 | $2.22 | +7.15% |
MPLXP | $33.38 | -0.01% | 34.1B | 11.29 | $2.96 | +7.25% |
Stock Comparison
GMLPF vs EBRGF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while EBRGF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and EBRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs EBBNF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while EBBNF trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs ENBGF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and ENBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs ENNPF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while ENNPF trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and ENNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs TCANF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while TCANF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and TCANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs EBGEF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while EBGEF trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and EBGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs TNCAF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while TNCAF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and TNCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs EBBGF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while EBBGF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs MPLXP Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and MPLXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs EBRZF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while EBRZF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and EBRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs ENBRF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while ENBRF trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs PMBPF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while PMBPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs PMMBF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while PMMBF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and PMMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs SOCGM Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while SOCGM trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and SOCGM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs PPLAF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while PPLAF trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs PBNAF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while PBNAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and PBNAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs KEYUF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while KEYUF trades at $30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs EQTNP Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs FRVWY Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while FRVWY trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and FRVWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs VOPKY Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while VOPKY trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and VOPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs VOPKF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while VOPKF trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs TPZEF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while TPZEF trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 70.04. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and TPZEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs GBNXF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while GBNXF trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs SOCGP Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while SOCGP trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to SOCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs SPKOY Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while SPKOY trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and SPKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs FDVWF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while FDVWF trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and FDVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs SNPKF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and SNPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs OGSRW Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs TWMIF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while TWMIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs AVACF Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while AVACF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs TTNN Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while TTNN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs MRGE Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and MRGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GMLPF vs CWPE Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 321K. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while CWPE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs LOGL Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 94.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs FLST Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMLPF.
GMLPF vs TIDE Comparison
GMLPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMLPF stands at 97.3K. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, GMLPF is priced at $1.38, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMLPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GMLPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMLPF and TIDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).