GLG Life Tech Corporation

GLG.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLG.TO stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DC-A.TO has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLG.TO is priced at CA$0.05, while DC-A.TO trades at CA$2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, GLG.TO's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DC-A.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLG.TO is more volatile compared to DC-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLG.TO.Check DC-A.TO's competition here

GLG.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLG.TO stands at 1.9M. In comparison, OPTI.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, GLG.TO is priced at CA$0.05, while OPTI.CN trades at CA$0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas OPTI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, GLG.TO's ROE is -0.56%, compared to OPTI.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GLG.TO is more volatile compared to OPTI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLG.TO.Check OPTI.CN's competition here

GLG.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLG.TO stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AFI.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLG.TO is priced at CA$0.05, while AFI.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas AFI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, GLG.TO's ROE is -0.56%, compared to AFI.CN's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLG.TO is more volatile compared to AFI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLG.TO.Check AFI.CN's competition here

GLG.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLG.TO stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ULTA.CN has a market cap of 462.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GLG.TO is priced at CA$0.05, while ULTA.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ULTA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, GLG.TO's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ULTA.CN's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GLG.TO is less volatile compared to ULTA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLG.TO.Check ULTA.CN's competition here

GLG.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLG.TO stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VFF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLG.TO is priced at CA$0.05, while VFF.TO trades at CA$8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas VFF.TO's P/E ratio is -117.68. In terms of profitability, GLG.TO's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VFF.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLG.TO is more volatile compared to VFF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLG.TO.Check VFF.TO's competition here