Galenfeha, Inc.
Galenfeha, Inc. GLFH Peers
See (GLFH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLFH | $3.75 | N/A | 1.2M | -37.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| TNRSF | $17.34 | N/A | 18.6B | 10.57 | $1.64 | +4.79% |
| GZPZY | $39.35 | N/A | 7.3B | 18.22 | $2.16 | +2.98% |
| THNPY | $39.39 | +0.82% | 7B | 15.76 | $2.50 | +2.06% |
| CHOLF | $0.77 | N/A | 6.9B | 7.70 | $0.10 | +4.18% |
| THNPF | $37.94 | -5.15% | 6.6B | 15.18 | $2.50 | +2.20% |
| SUBCY | $18.78 | -1.78% | 5.6B | 29.34 | $0.64 | +4.61% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | N/A | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +4.86% |
| SAPMF | $2.72 | +3.82% | 5.3B | 16.00 | $0.17 | +7.03% |
| WYGPF | $9.13 | N/A | 4.8B | 19.85 | $0.46 | +3.57% |
Stock Comparison
GLFH vs TNRSF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TNRSF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs GZPZY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while GZPZY trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs THNPY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while THNPY trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CHOLF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CHOLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs THNPF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while THNPF trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to THNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SUBCY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SUBCY trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs GZPZF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SAPMF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SAPMF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs WYGPF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while WYGPF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs ACGYF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while ACGYF trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SBFFF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SBFFF trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs WYGPY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while WYGPY trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to WYGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SBFFY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SBFFY trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TRRVF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TRRVF trades at $123.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TGSNF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TGSNF trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TGSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CIMEF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CIMEF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs AKRYY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while AKRYY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs AKRTF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs MDIKF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CESDF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CESDF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PGEJF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PGEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SAWLF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PSYTF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PSYTF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs ATONF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 691.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while ATONF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TOLWF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 628.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TOLWF trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs HNTIF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while HNTIF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to HNTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SBOEF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs HNTIY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 481.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while HNTIY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to HNTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs ATONY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while ATONY trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs AKKVF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CGGYY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TOTZF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 317.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TOTZF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SHANF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SHANF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs DDHLF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to DDHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs BLYFF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to BLYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CFWFF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CFWFF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs JUTOY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while JUTOY trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SNVVF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SNVVF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -18.89. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SNVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PDER Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PDER trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PKDC Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PKDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs WFTSF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 154.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs QSEP Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while QSEP trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs POFCY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SCEYF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SCEYF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PLSDF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PLSDF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs ETOLF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while ETOLF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 65.85. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PRSEF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs MCCRF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while MCCRF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CAWLF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CAWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs EEYUF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs GWTI Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while GWTI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs POFCF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs NSFDF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while NSFDF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to NSFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs ENGT Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while ENGT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -17.16. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs QDRSF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to QDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs BWTX Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs KLNG Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while KLNG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs WEIIF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to WEIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs FOYJ Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TAGP Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TAGP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs HGHAF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while HGHAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to HGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CGPVF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs OXFCF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to OXFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs BRYFF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while BRYFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CTNR Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CTNR trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.62. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TXLZF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs NWPIF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to NWPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SKPO Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 690.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SMGI Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 615.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SMGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs IRIG Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs FSEI Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SSOF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 139.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs IESCF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to IESCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PKDCW Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs GPTC Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs WWNG Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CPYJ Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SGUJ Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SGUJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TEGR Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TEGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CSSV Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs AURI Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to AURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs RTSO Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to RTSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SUBB Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs LNDT Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to LNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CTBG Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CTBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs BMMCF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs USEI Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to USEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs PTOG Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs AMCF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CDVIQ Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs POOSF Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs EHYD Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to EHYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs SYNE Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 473. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs NNYR Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to NNYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs ALRY Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 116. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to ALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs ISYX Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to ISYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs CHMR Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to CHMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs TXGE Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 57. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to TXGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.
GLFH vs IOGPQ Comparison
GLFH plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLFH stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IOGPQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLFH is priced at $3.75, while IOGPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLFH currently has a P/E ratio of -37.50, whereas IOGPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLFH's ROE is -12.85%, compared to IOGPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLFH is more volatile compared to IOGPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLFH.