Egide S.A.
Egide S.A. GID.PA Peers
See (GID.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GID.PA | €0.80 | N/A | 0 | 40.10 | €0.02 | N/A |
| SESL.PA | €122.00 | +0.33% | 1.9B | 18.60 | €6.56 | N/A |
| BAR.BR | €12.82 | +0.23% | 1.1B | 18.31 | €0.70 | +3.99% |
| ALNSE.PA | €39.30 | -1.26% | 124.8M | 34.47 | €1.14 | +0.63% |
| PAY.BR | €6.80 | -1.45% | 120.2M | 10.30 | €0.66 | N/A |
| ALICA.PA | €7.66 | -1.29% | 61.7M | 16.65 | €0.46 | +2.58% |
| LACR.PA | €7.22 | -1.10% | 33.8M | -1.87 | -€3.86 | +9.59% |
| ALGTR.PA | €4.10 | -2.38% | 16.3M | -20.50 | -€0.20 | N/A |
| MLMAD.PA | €11.80 | N/A | 15.1M | N/A | N/A | +4.63% |
| ALNEO.PA | €0.50 | N/A | 13M | 3.57 | €0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GID.PA vs SESL.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SESL.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while SESL.PA trades at €122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas SESL.PA's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SESL.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to SESL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs BAR.BR Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, BAR.BR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while BAR.BR trades at €12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas BAR.BR's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAR.BR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to BAR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALNSE.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALNSE.PA has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALNSE.PA trades at €39.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALNSE.PA's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALNSE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to ALNSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs PAY.BR Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, PAY.BR has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while PAY.BR trades at €6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas PAY.BR's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAY.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to PAY.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALICA.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALICA.PA has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALICA.PA trades at €7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALICA.PA's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALICA.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to ALICA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs LACR.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, LACR.PA has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while LACR.PA trades at €7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas LACR.PA's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LACR.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to LACR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALGTR.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALGTR.PA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALGTR.PA trades at €4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALGTR.PA's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALGTR.PA's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is less volatile compared to ALGTR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs MLMAD.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLMAD.PA has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while MLMAD.PA trades at €11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas MLMAD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLMAD.PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to MLMAD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALNEO.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALNEO.PA has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALNEO.PA trades at €0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALNEO.PA's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALNEO.PA's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to ALNEO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALCOF.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALCOF.PA has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALCOF.PA trades at €320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALCOF.PA's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALCOF.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to ALCOF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs MLNOV.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLNOV.PA has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while MLNOV.PA trades at €12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas MLNOV.PA's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLNOV.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to MLNOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALGID.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALGID.PA has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALGID.PA trades at €0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALGID.PA's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALGID.PA's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to ALGID.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALROC.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALROC.PA has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALROC.PA trades at €0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALROC.PA's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALROC.PA's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to ALROC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALTEV.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALTEV.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALTEV.PA trades at €167.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALTEV.PA's P/E ratio is 49.29. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTEV.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to ALTEV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs ALM.PA Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALM.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while ALM.PA trades at €2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas ALM.PA's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALM.PA's ROE of +15.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is less volatile compared to ALM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.
GID.PA vs NEWAY.AS Comparison
GID.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GID.PA stands at 0. In comparison, NEWAY.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GID.PA is priced at €0.80, while NEWAY.AS trades at €12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GID.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas NEWAY.AS's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, GID.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEWAY.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GID.PA is more volatile compared to NEWAY.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GID.PA.