Gamehost Inc.

GH.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GH.TO stands at 220.80M. In comparison, PBL.TO has a market cap of 530.53M. Regarding current trading prices, GH.TO is priced at $10.56, while PBL.TO trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PBL.TO's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, GH.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBL.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GH.TO is less volatile compared to PBL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GH.TO.

GH.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GH.TO stands at 220.80M. In comparison, FANS.TO has a market cap of 26.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GH.TO is priced at $10.56, while FANS.TO trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FANS.TO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, GH.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FANS.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GH.TO is less volatile compared to FANS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GH.TO.

GH.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GH.TO stands at 220.80M. In comparison, SKLL.CN has a market cap of 11.16M. Regarding current trading prices, GH.TO is priced at $10.56, while SKLL.CN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SKLL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, GH.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKLL.CN's ROE of +4.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GH.TO is more volatile compared to SKLL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GH.TO.

GH.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GH.TO stands at 220.80M. In comparison, JKPT.CN has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GH.TO is priced at $10.56, while JKPT.CN trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas JKPT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GH.TO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JKPT.CN's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GH.TO is more volatile compared to JKPT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GH.TO.