Gigaset AG
Gigaset AG (GGS.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GGS.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGS.F | €0.02 | +0.00% | 2.6M | -0.22 | -€0.09 | N/A |
| CIS.DE | €68.36 | +0.46% | 270B | 28.48 | €2.40 | +2.07% |
| MTLA.DE | €378.65 | +0.99% | 62.7B | 34.14 | €11.09 | +1.04% |
| CIE1.DE | €391.50 | +8.52% | 55.4B | 287.87 | €1.36 | N/A |
| NOA3.DE | €7.37 | +2.85% | 41.1B | 67.00 | €0.11 | +1.80% |
| ERCB.DE | €9.94 | +0.28% | 33.2B | 12.74 | €0.78 | +2.67% |
| ERCG.DE | €9.81 | -1.11% | 32.7B | 12.58 | €0.78 | +2.70% |
| 2HP.DE | €21.36 | +2.77% | 28.8B | -142.40 | -€0.15 | +2.18% |
| JNP.DE | €34.69 | -0.77% | 11.4B | 34.01 | €1.02 | +0.55% |
| ADV.DE | €22.70 | +0.44% | 1.2B | -13.35 | -€1.70 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
GGS.F vs CIS.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CIS.DE has a market cap of 270B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while CIS.DE trades at €68.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CIS.DE's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIS.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to CIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check CIS.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs MTLA.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MTLA.DE has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while MTLA.DE trades at €378.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MTLA.DE's P/E ratio is 34.14. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTLA.DE's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to MTLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check MTLA.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs CIE1.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CIE1.DE has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while CIE1.DE trades at €391.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CIE1.DE's P/E ratio is 287.87. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIE1.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is less volatile compared to CIE1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check CIE1.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs NOA3.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NOA3.DE has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while NOA3.DE trades at €7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NOA3.DE's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOA3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to NOA3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check NOA3.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs ERCB.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ERCB.DE has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while ERCB.DE trades at €9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ERCB.DE's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERCB.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to ERCB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check ERCB.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs ERCG.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ERCG.DE has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while ERCG.DE trades at €9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ERCG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERCG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to ERCG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check ERCG.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs 2HP.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, 2HP.DE has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while 2HP.DE trades at €21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas 2HP.DE's P/E ratio is -142.40. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2HP.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to 2HP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check 2HP.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs JNP.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, JNP.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while JNP.DE trades at €34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JNP.DE's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNP.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to JNP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check JNP.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs ADV.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ADV.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while ADV.DE trades at €22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ADV.DE's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADV.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to ADV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check ADV.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs FQT.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FQT.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while FQT.DE trades at €77.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FQT.DE's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FQT.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to FQT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check FQT.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs ADVV.F Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ADVV.F has a market cap of 837.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while ADVV.F trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ADVV.F's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADVV.F's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to ADVV.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check ADVV.F's competition here
GGS.F vs CEK.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CEK.DE has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while CEK.DE trades at €11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CEK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEK.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to CEK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check CEK.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs CEA.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CEA.DE has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while CEA.DE trades at €4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CEA.DE's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA.DE's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to CEA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check CEA.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs TLFP.BE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLFP.BE has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while TLFP.BE trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TLFP.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLFP.BE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to TLFP.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check TLFP.BE's competition here
GGS.F vs GGS.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GGS.DE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while GGS.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GGS.DE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGS.DE's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to GGS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check GGS.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs TLIK.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLIK.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while TLIK.DE trades at €0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TLIK.DE's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLIK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to TLIK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check TLIK.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs M0YN.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, M0YN.DE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while M0YN.DE trades at €0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas M0YN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to M0YN.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is less volatile compared to M0YN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check M0YN.DE's competition here
GGS.F vs M0Y.DE Comparison April 2026
GGS.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGS.F stands at 2.6M. In comparison, M0Y.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGS.F is priced at €0.02, while M0Y.DE trades at €28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGS.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas M0Y.DE's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, GGS.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to M0Y.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GGS.F is more volatile compared to M0Y.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGS.F.Check M0Y.DE's competition here