Grafton Group plc
Grafton Group plc (GFTU.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFTU.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFTU.L | £884.40 | -0.73% | 1.7B | 12.46 | £0.71 | +4.18% |
| 0IKW.L | £46.45 | -0.27% | 53.3B | 27.32 | £1.70 | +1.84% |
| 0IZI.L | £1,053.88 | +0.51% | 50.6B | 47.01 | £22.42 | +0.80% |
| FERG.L | £17,120.00 | +1.36% | 33.8B | 28.53 | £6.00 | +1.21% |
| 0QRA.L | £98.51 | +0.23% | 18.7B | 7.26 | £13.56 | +51.33% |
| DPLM.L | £5,335.00 | +0.85% | 7.2B | 43.02 | £1.24 | +1.13% |
| 0RTK.L | £110.20 | +0.92% | 5.5B | 12.96 | £8.50 | +1.88% |
| RS1.L | £565.50 | -0.79% | 2.7B | 17.14 | £0.33 | +3.96% |
| 0RNT.L | £93.80 | -1.57% | 2.6B | 10.09 | £9.30 | +3.27% |
| 0K9J.L | £15.87 | +4.21% | 1.7B | 39.00 | £0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFTU.L vs 0IKW.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0IKW.L has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0IKW.L trades at £46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0IKW.L's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IKW.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to 0IKW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0IKW.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs 0IZI.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0IZI.L has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0IZI.L trades at £1,053.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0IZI.L's P/E ratio is 47.01. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IZI.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to 0IZI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0IZI.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs FERG.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FERG.L has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while FERG.L trades at £17,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas FERG.L's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FERG.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to FERG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check FERG.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs 0QRA.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QRA.L has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0QRA.L trades at £98.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0QRA.L's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QRA.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to 0QRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0QRA.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs DPLM.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DPLM.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while DPLM.L trades at £5,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DPLM.L's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPLM.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to DPLM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check DPLM.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs 0RTK.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0RTK.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0RTK.L trades at £110.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0RTK.L's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RTK.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to 0RTK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0RTK.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs RS1.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RS1.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while RS1.L trades at £565.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas RS1.L's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RS1.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to RS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check RS1.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs 0RNT.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0RNT.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0RNT.L trades at £93.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0RNT.L's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RNT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to 0RNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0RNT.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs 0K9J.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0K9J.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0K9J.L trades at £15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0K9J.L's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0K9J.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to 0K9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0K9J.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs 0AH7.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0AH7.L has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0AH7.L trades at £10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0AH7.L's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0AH7.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is less volatile compared to 0AH7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0AH7.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs LTHP.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LTHP.L has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while LTHP.L trades at £122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas LTHP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTHP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to LTHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check LTHP.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs BRCK.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRCK.L has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while BRCK.L trades at £62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BRCK.L's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRCK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is less volatile compared to BRCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check BRCK.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs SHI.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHI.L has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while SHI.L trades at £14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SHI.L's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHI.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is less volatile compared to SHI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check SHI.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs LORD.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LORD.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while LORD.L trades at £44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas LORD.L's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LORD.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to LORD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check LORD.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs FLO.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FLO.L has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while FLO.L trades at £59.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas FLO.L's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLO.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is less volatile compared to FLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check FLO.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs BMTO.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BMTO.L has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while BMTO.L trades at £1,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BMTO.L's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMTO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to BMTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check BMTO.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs BMT.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BMT.L has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while BMT.L trades at £900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BMT.L's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to BMT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check BMT.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs SLNG.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLNG.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while SLNG.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SLNG.L's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLNG.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to SLNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check SLNG.L's competition here
GFTU.L vs 0RR3.L Comparison July 2025
GFTU.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFTU.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0RR3.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFTU.L is priced at £884.40, while 0RR3.L trades at £143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFTU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas 0RR3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFTU.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RR3.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFTU.L is more volatile compared to 0RR3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFTU.L.Check 0RR3.L's competition here