Galliford Try Holdings PLC
Galliford Try Holdings PLC GFRD.L Peers
See (GFRD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFRD.L | £411.00 | N/A | 401.5M | 10.54 | £0.39 | +4.15% |
| 0KSR.L | £352.83 | +1.64% | 52.3B | 107.44 | £3.28 | +0.11% |
| LTOD.L | £22.20 | +0.45% | 30.5B | 17.34 | £1.28 | +3.30% |
| 0OFP.IL | £190.75 | +0.32% | 17.4B | 13.80 | £13.82 | +4.43% |
| 0DH7.L | £151.20 | -0.79% | 16.5B | 16.08 | £9.40 | +3.23% |
| 0H9N.L | £111.76 | +0.94% | 14.8B | 77.08 | £1.45 | +0.85% |
| 0MKP.L | £79.70 | +1.01% | 9.2B | 13.96 | £5.71 | +2.76% |
| 0IQC.L | £48.71 | +6.72% | 8B | -20.30 | -£2.40 | N/A |
| BAB.L | £1,048.00 | +1.16% | 5.3B | 27.58 | £0.38 | +0.51% |
| BBY.L | £504.00 | +0.10% | 2.5B | 14.82 | £0.34 | +2.46% |
Stock Comparison
GFRD.L vs 0KSR.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0KSR.L has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0KSR.L trades at £352.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0KSR.L's P/E ratio is 107.44. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0KSR.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0KSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs LTOD.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, LTOD.L has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while LTOD.L trades at £22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas LTOD.L's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LTOD.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to LTOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0OFP.IL Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0OFP.IL has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0OFP.IL trades at £190.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0OFP.IL's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0OFP.IL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0OFP.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0DH7.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0DH7.L has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0DH7.L trades at £151.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0DH7.L's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0DH7.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0DH7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0H9N.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0H9N.L has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0H9N.L trades at £111.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0H9N.L's P/E ratio is 77.08. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0H9N.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0H9N.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0MKP.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0MKP.L has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0MKP.L trades at £79.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0MKP.L's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0MKP.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0MKP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0IQC.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0IQC.L has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0IQC.L trades at £48.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0IQC.L's P/E ratio is -20.30. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0IQC.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to 0IQC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs BAB.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, BAB.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while BAB.L trades at £1,048.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas BAB.L's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BAB.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to BAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs BBY.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, BBY.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while BBY.L trades at £504.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas BBY.L's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BBY.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to BBY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs MGNS.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, MGNS.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while MGNS.L trades at £3,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas MGNS.L's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MGNS.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to MGNS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0M6I.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0M6I.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0M6I.L trades at £55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0M6I.L's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0M6I.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0M6I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0R53.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0R53.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0R53.L trades at £8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0R53.L's P/E ratio is 556.25. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0R53.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0R53.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs HILS.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, HILS.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while HILS.L trades at £1,708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas HILS.L's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HILS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to HILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0QO2.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0QO2.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0QO2.L trades at £127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0QO2.L's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0QO2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0QO2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0R8F.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0R8F.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0R8F.L trades at £50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0R8F.L's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0R8F.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0R8F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs KLR.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, KLR.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while KLR.L trades at £1,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas KLR.L's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KLR.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to KLR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs KIE.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, KIE.L has a market cap of 743.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while KIE.L trades at £174.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas KIE.L's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KIE.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to KIE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs RNWH.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, RNWH.L has a market cap of 660.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while RNWH.L trades at £834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas RNWH.L's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RNWH.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to RNWH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0OA7.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0OA7.L has a market cap of 593.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0OA7.L trades at £41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0OA7.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0OA7.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0OA7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0QNT.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0QNT.L has a market cap of 436.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0QNT.L trades at £23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0QNT.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0QNT.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0QNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs COST.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, COST.L has a market cap of 356M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while COST.L trades at £130.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas COST.L's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to COST.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to COST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs SUR.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, SUR.L has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while SUR.L trades at £124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas SUR.L's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SUR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to SUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs SFR.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, SFR.L has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while SFR.L trades at £34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas SFR.L's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SFR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to SFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs CTO.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, CTO.L has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while CTO.L trades at £159.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas CTO.L's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CTO.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to CTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0QIH.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0QIH.L has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0QIH.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0QIH.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0QIH.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0QIH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs BILN.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, BILN.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while BILN.L trades at £415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas BILN.L's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BILN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to BILN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs KINO.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, KINO.L has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while KINO.L trades at £86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas KINO.L's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KINO.L's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to KINO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs 0F7F.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0F7F.L has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0F7F.L trades at £0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0F7F.L's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0F7F.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0F7F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs SMJ.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, SMJ.L has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while SMJ.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas SMJ.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SMJ.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to SMJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs VANL.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, VANL.L has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while VANL.L trades at £40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas VANL.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VANL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to VANL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs HERC.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, HERC.L has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while HERC.L trades at £46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas HERC.L's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HERC.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to HERC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs NEXS.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, NEXS.L has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while NEXS.L trades at £160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas NEXS.L's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NEXS.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to NEXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs TGP.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, TGP.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while TGP.L trades at £4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas TGP.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TGP.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to TGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs AUK.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, AUK.L has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while AUK.L trades at £1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas AUK.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AUK.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to AUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs RAI.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, RAI.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while RAI.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas RAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RAI.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to RAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs FCRM.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, FCRM.L has a market cap of 718.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while FCRM.L trades at £0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas FCRM.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCRM.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GFRD.L has daily volatility of 4.63 and FCRM.L has daily volatility of N/A.
GFRD.L vs JLG.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, JLG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while JLG.L trades at £402.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas JLG.L's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JLG.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to JLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs CLLN.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, CLLN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while CLLN.L trades at £0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas CLLN.L's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CLLN.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to CLLN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs TPG.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, TPG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while TPG.L trades at £2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas TPG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TPG.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GFRD.L has daily volatility of 4.63 and TPG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
GFRD.L vs 0DMQ.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, 0DMQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while 0DMQ.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas 0DMQ.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to 0DMQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is more volatile compared to 0DMQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.
GFRD.L vs NMCN.L Comparison
GFRD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFRD.L stands at 401.5M. In comparison, NMCN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFRD.L is priced at £411.00, while NMCN.L trades at £117.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFRD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.54, whereas NMCN.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, GFRD.L's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NMCN.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFRD.L is less volatile compared to NMCN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFRD.L.