Griffin Mining Limited
Griffin Mining Limited GFM.L Peers
See (GFM.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFM.L | £163.00 | -0.76% | 300.4M | 40.75 | £0.04 | N/A |
| BHP.L | £1,870.50 | +0.11% | 94.9B | 11.27 | £1.66 | +4.96% |
| 0L5V.L | £358.99 | -0.02% | 90B | 52.13 | £6.89 | +0.85% |
| 0R2J.L | £161.05 | -0.41% | 81.4B | 68.77 | £2.34 | +0.85% |
| 0L8B.L | £96.93 | -0.07% | 77.9B | 21.93 | £4.42 | +2.79% |
| 0IFA.L | £267.74 | -0.29% | 75.9B | 69.71 | £3.84 | +0.90% |
| RIO.L | £4,351.00 | -0.58% | 74B | 8.27 | £5.26 | +7.21% |
| 0HBH.L | £281.60 | +0.55% | 62.7B | 28.05 | £10.04 | +2.51% |
| GLEN.L | £289.00 | -0.34% | 34.5B | -28.90 | -£0.10 | +1.97% |
| 0Z4C.L | £231.20 | -2.78% | 32.8B | 35.01 | £6.60 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
GFM.L vs BHP.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while BHP.L trades at £1,870.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0L5V.L trades at £358.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R2J.L trades at £161.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 68.77. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0L8B.L trades at £96.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0IFA.L trades at £267.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 69.71. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs RIO.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while RIO.L trades at £4,351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0HBH.L trades at £281.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while GLEN.L trades at £289.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -28.90. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0Z4C.L trades at £231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0NHS.L trades at £59.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0K9L.L trades at £117.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0KEI.L trades at £114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs AAL.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while AAL.L trades at £2,143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0EDD.L trades at £60.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0UGS.L trades at £37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -89.23. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0HQU.L trades at £92.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R07.L trades at £40.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0LJ9.L trades at £53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0KXS.L trades at £173.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 39.63. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0K3B.L trades at £34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0LVK.L trades at £81.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0IF3.L trades at £80.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0HC7.L trades at £64.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0HCB.L trades at £28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0U6C.L trades at £30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs S32.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while S32.L trades at £148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0QYN.L trades at £4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0HUR.L trades at £58.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R0U.L trades at £9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -86.60. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0IK3.L trades at £44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0AHJ.L trades at £13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VBE.L trades at £25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -166.77. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VL5.L trades at £46.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R0A.L trades at £6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 203.15. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0L45.L trades at £63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VGE.L trades at £17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0I0H.L trades at £7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VGM.L trades at £12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 59.42. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0QYM.L trades at £9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VOA.L trades at £19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0TWH.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GFM.L has daily volatility of 6.13 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
GFM.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VHI.L trades at £16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0KW8.L trades at £21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0HWG.L trades at £11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R2C.L trades at £6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 65.78. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0NZN.L trades at £872.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0QZ2.L trades at £5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R11.L trades at £2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 837.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while ADT1.L trades at £229.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 687.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0G5B.L trades at £122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 516.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0O6D.L trades at £14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0JZT.L trades at £7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 476.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0KD1.L trades at £4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -40.64. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 457M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VIK.L trades at £2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs KMR.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while KMR.L trades at £391.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 341.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R20.L trades at £0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs SVML.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while SVML.L trades at £36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0P07.L trades at £0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 208.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while SOLG.L trades at £6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0UYN.L trades at £1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0RRC.L trades at £4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while ECOR.L trades at £62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -20.80. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs BSE.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while BSE.L trades at £12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs PRE.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while PRE.L trades at £49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0V46.L trades at £0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs KP2.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while KP2.L trades at £2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs TRR.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while TRR.L trades at £48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while CAPD.L trades at £72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0VNO.L trades at £0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs JLP.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while JLP.L trades at £3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while CUSN.L trades at £7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0IYS.L trades at £0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0QQR.L trades at £18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs SAV.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while SAV.L trades at £3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0UIK.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs RBW.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while RBW.L trades at £11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0R0D.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0QVG.L trades at £5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs HE1.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while HE1.L trades at £0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs KOD.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while KOD.L trades at £0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs MKA.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while MKA.L trades at £16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while AFRK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs FAR.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while FAR.L trades at £9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs ATM.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while ATM.L trades at £2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs ALL.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while ALL.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0ICI.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0UYO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0QPH.L trades at £1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs ARS.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while ARS.L trades at £1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs FOX.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, FOX.L has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while FOX.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas FOX.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOX.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to FOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs NMT.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while NMT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while ZNWD.L trades at £5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 1SN.L trades at £5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs KAV.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while KAV.L trades at £0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs CRCL.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while CRCL.L trades at £0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs GSP.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while GSP.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs 0V7X.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, 0V7X.L has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while 0V7X.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas 0V7X.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0V7X.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is more volatile compared to 0V7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs EMH.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while EMH.L trades at £9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.
GFM.L vs RMR.L Comparison
GFM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFM.L stands at 300.4M. In comparison, RMR.L has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFM.L is priced at £163.00, while RMR.L trades at £0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.75, whereas RMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFM.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RMR.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GFM.L is less volatile compared to RMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFM.L.