GFL Environmental Inc.

GFL.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL.TO stands at 23.94B. In comparison, WCN.TO has a market cap of 69.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL.TO is priced at $67.46, while WCN.TO trades at $269.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.97, whereas WCN.TO's P/E ratio is 79.61. In terms of profitability, GFL.TO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WCN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL.TO is more volatile compared to WCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.TO.

GFL.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL.TO stands at 23.94B. In comparison, SES.TO has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL.TO is priced at $67.46, while SES.TO trades at $14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.97, whereas SES.TO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, GFL.TO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SES.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL.TO is less volatile compared to SES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.TO.

GFL.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL.TO stands at 23.94B. In comparison, ANRG.TO has a market cap of 224.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL.TO is priced at $67.46, while ANRG.TO trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.97, whereas ANRG.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, GFL.TO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ANRG.TO's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL.TO is less volatile compared to ANRG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.TO.

GFL.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL.TO stands at 23.94B. In comparison, LUX.CN has a market cap of 15.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL.TO is priced at $67.46, while LUX.CN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.97, whereas LUX.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GFL.TO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LUX.CN's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL.TO is more volatile compared to LUX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.TO.

GFL.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFL.TO stands at 23.94B. In comparison, BAC.CN has a market cap of 9.65M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL.TO is priced at $67.46, while BAC.CN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.97, whereas BAC.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GFL.TO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BAC.CN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL.TO is more volatile compared to BAC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.TO.