Gayatri Highways Limited
Gayatri Highways Limited (GAYAHWS.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GAYAHWS.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Infrastructure Operations Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAYAHWS.NS | ₹2.23 | -9.35% | 560.8M | -2.46 | -₹0.95 | N/A |
| IRB.NS | ₹40.16 | -1.28% | 243.1B | 31.70 | ₹1.27 | +0.52% |
| IRB.BO | ₹40.20 | -1.18% | 242.9B | 31.67 | ₹1.27 | +0.52% |
| GMRP&UI.NS | ₹118.30 | +2.80% | 91.6B | 9.96 | ₹11.78 | N/A |
| IRBINVIT.NS | ₹61.49 | -0.42% | 35.7B | 9.74 | ₹6.32 | +11.37% |
| HILINFRA.NS | ₹56.84 | +3.01% | 4.1B | 11.77 | ₹4.83 | N/A |
| HILINFRA.BO | ₹57.49 | +4.60% | 4.1B | 11.60 | ₹4.90 | N/A |
| MARKOLINES.NS | ₹156.70 | -2.54% | 3.5B | 13.85 | ₹11.59 | +0.93% |
| ATLANTAA.NS | ₹40.99 | +3.22% | 3.3B | -23.71 | -₹1.72 | N/A |
| ATLANTAA.BO | ₹40.99 | +3.72% | 3.3B | -23.65 | -₹1.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GAYAHWS.NS vs IRB.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, IRB.NS has a market cap of 243.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while IRB.NS trades at ₹40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas IRB.NS's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to IRB.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to IRB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check IRB.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs IRB.BO Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, IRB.BO has a market cap of 242.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while IRB.BO trades at ₹40.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas IRB.BO's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to IRB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to IRB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check IRB.BO's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs GMRP&UI.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, GMRP&UI.NS has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while GMRP&UI.NS trades at ₹118.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas GMRP&UI.NS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to GMRP&UI.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to GMRP&UI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check GMRP&UI.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs IRBINVIT.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, IRBINVIT.NS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while IRBINVIT.NS trades at ₹61.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas IRBINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to IRBINVIT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to IRBINVIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check IRBINVIT.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs HILINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, HILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while HILINFRA.NS trades at ₹56.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas HILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to HILINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to HILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check HILINFRA.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs HILINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, HILINFRA.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while HILINFRA.BO trades at ₹57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas HILINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to HILINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to HILINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check HILINFRA.BO's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs MARKOLINES.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, MARKOLINES.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while MARKOLINES.NS trades at ₹156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas MARKOLINES.NS's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to MARKOLINES.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to MARKOLINES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check MARKOLINES.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs ATLANTAA.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, ATLANTAA.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while ATLANTAA.NS trades at ₹40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas ATLANTAA.NS's P/E ratio is -23.71. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to ATLANTAA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to ATLANTAA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check ATLANTAA.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs ATLANTAA.BO Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, ATLANTAA.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while ATLANTAA.BO trades at ₹40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas ATLANTAA.BO's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to ATLANTAA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to ATLANTAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check ATLANTAA.BO's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs ATLANTA.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, ATLANTA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while ATLANTA.NS trades at ₹24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas ATLANTA.NS's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to ATLANTA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to ATLANTA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check ATLANTA.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs JPINFRATEC.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, JPINFRATEC.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while JPINFRATEC.NS trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas JPINFRATEC.NS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to JPINFRATEC.NS's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to JPINFRATEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check JPINFRATEC.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs BRNL.BO Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, BRNL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while BRNL.BO trades at ₹19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas BRNL.BO's P/E ratio is 0.91. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to BRNL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to BRNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check BRNL.BO's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs BRNL.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, BRNL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while BRNL.NS trades at ₹19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas BRNL.NS's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to BRNL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to BRNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check BRNL.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs ARSSINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, ARSSINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while ARSSINFRA.NS trades at ₹54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas ARSSINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to ARSSINFRA.NS's ROE of -20.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to ARSSINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check ARSSINFRA.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs IL&FSTRANS.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, IL&FSTRANS.NS has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while IL&FSTRANS.NS trades at ₹2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas IL&FSTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to IL&FSTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to IL&FSTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check IL&FSTRANS.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs NOIDATOLL.BO Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, NOIDATOLL.BO has a market cap of 733.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while NOIDATOLL.BO trades at ₹3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas NOIDATOLL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to NOIDATOLL.BO's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to NOIDATOLL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check NOIDATOLL.BO's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs NOIDATOLL.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, NOIDATOLL.NS has a market cap of 726.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while NOIDATOLL.NS trades at ₹3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas NOIDATOLL.NS's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to NOIDATOLL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check NOIDATOLL.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs AJRINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, AJRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 659.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while AJRINFRA.NS trades at ₹0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas AJRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to AJRINFRA.NS's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is less volatile compared to AJRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check AJRINFRA.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs MEP.BO Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, MEP.BO has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while MEP.BO trades at ₹1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas MEP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to MEP.BO's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to MEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check MEP.BO's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs MEP.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, MEP.NS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while MEP.NS trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas MEP.NS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to MEP.NS's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to MEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check MEP.NS's competition here
GAYAHWS.NS vs GAMMNINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
GAYAHWS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAYAHWS.NS stands at 560.8M. In comparison, GAMMNINFRA.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GAYAHWS.NS is priced at ₹2.23, while GAMMNINFRA.NS trades at ₹1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAYAHWS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.46, whereas GAMMNINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, GAYAHWS.NS's ROE is -1.43%, compared to GAMMNINFRA.NS's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GAYAHWS.NS is more volatile compared to GAMMNINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAYAHWS.NS.Check GAMMNINFRA.NS's competition here