Golden Agri-Resources Ltd
Golden Agri-Resources Ltd GARPF Peers
See (GARPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARPF | $0.18 | N/A | 2.28B | 6.00 | $0.03 | +3.43% |
| WLMIY | $23.95 | +1.27% | 14.95B | 12.81 | $1.87 | +4.70% |
| WLMIF | $2.39 | N/A | 14.92B | 12.58 | $0.19 | +5.12% |
| MHGVY | $18.59 | -0.42% | 9.61B | 26.18 | $0.71 | +2.62% |
| MNHVF | $18.40 | +4.49% | 9.51B | 25.92 | $0.71 | +2.91% |
| SALRF | $54.04 | +17.48% | 7.22B | 25.13 | $2.15 | +6.04% |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | N/A | 6.87B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +1.10% |
| PPOKF | $0.39 | +15.59% | 6.44B | 39.30 | $0.01 | +0.47% |
| KLKBY | $5.32 | +24.15% | 6.36B | 35.47 | $0.15 | +0.58% |
| SALRY | $11.35 | -5.77% | 6.07B | 21.02 | $0.54 | +6.68% |
Stock Comparison
GARPF vs WLMIY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while WLMIY trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs WLMIF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 14.92B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while WLMIF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to WLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs MHGVY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.61B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while MHGVY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs MNHVF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while MNHVF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to MNHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SALRF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SALRF trades at $54.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs KLKBF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.87B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to KLKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs PPOKF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to PPOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs KLKBY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while KLKBY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to KLKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SALRY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6.07B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SALRY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CHPFF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 6.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to CHPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs AAYYY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CPOUF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CPOUF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to CPOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs ACOPY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while ACOPY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to ACOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs BKFKF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while BKFKF trades at $47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 75.24. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to BKFKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs IDBHF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs UPBMF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while UPBMF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs KNKZF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to KNKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs ASTVF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to ASTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SLCJY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SLCJY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs DNDPF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to DNDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs PTABF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while PTABF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs GRCLF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while GRCLF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to GRCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CTTQF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to CTTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs GRGSF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 774.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while GRGSF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to GRGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs MRVSY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 730.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while MRVSY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -16.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to MRVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs EDESY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 722.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while EDESY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to EDESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs PPLFF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.80M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs ASAGF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 602.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while ASAGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs MHPSY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 599.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while MHPSY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to MHPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SISAF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 561.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to SISAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs AAGRY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 538.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while AAGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to AAGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs PPLFY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 492.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while PPLFY trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs ORENF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 450.84M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while ORENF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to ORENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs BRCPF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to BRCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SLMCF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.17M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to SLMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SLCJF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs AEPLF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 373.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while AEPLF trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to AEPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs ALFDF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 284.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while ALFDF trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs UVPOF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 244.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while UVPOF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SARDF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SARDF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SARDY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 175.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SARDY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SARDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs STNT Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 162.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while STNT trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to STNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs DDEJF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 137.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while DDEJF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs DNDEF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs HLKKF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 48.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while HLKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to HLKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs NNUTU Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to NNUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs GARPY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 23.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while GARPY trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CTUNF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 16.11M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CTUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CLAD Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs OPTHF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while OPTHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs AASZF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 14.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while AASZF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to AASZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs PRCF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 12.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CMGHY Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.37M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SPZI Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 8.70M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SPZI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs PEASF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEASF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to PEASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs HERB Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 6.29M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while HERB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CMGHF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 4.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CMGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to CMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs GSFD Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while GSFD trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to GSFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs GCEH Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs RSSFF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to RSSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs MINE Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.26M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs STEV Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs PNDHF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 813126.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to PNDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs IGPFF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 462979.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while IGPFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs FLAF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 460417.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLAF's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to FLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs GLGLF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 430015.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while GLGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to GLGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs HERF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 249990.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while HERF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to HERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs MSAH Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 241135.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while MSAH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to MSAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs TAER Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 232968.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while TAER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to TAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs MSRM Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 211563.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while MSRM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SHMP Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 123627.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CHYI Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 66120.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CHYI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to CHYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs OGAA Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46364.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to OGAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs URYL Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 30209.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to URYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SUWN Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 19963.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SUWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to SUWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs SIAF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18107.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to SIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs FFRMF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 1708.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs BIQIF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 1003.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs CFPI Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 384.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while CFPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs URBF Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URBF's ROE of -56.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.
GARPF vs KALRQ Comparison
GARPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARPF stands at 2.28B. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184.00. Regarding current trading prices, GARPF is priced at $0.18, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARPF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GARPF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARPF is more volatile compared to KALRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARPF.