Ganesh Holdings Ltd.
Ganesh Holdings Ltd. (GANHOLD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GANHOLD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GANHOLD.BO | ₹63.35 | -4.02% | 57.2M | -24.79 | -₹2.59 | N/A |
| BAJAJFINSV.BO | ₹2,049.25 | -0.09% | 3.3T | 34.16 | ₹59.89 | +0.05% |
| BAJAJFINSV.NS | ₹2,049.30 | -0.11% | 3.3T | 34.11 | ₹59.90 | +0.05% |
| ABCAPITAL.NS | ₹353.10 | +1.99% | 914.5B | 26.30 | ₹13.28 | N/A |
| ABCAPITAL.BO | ₹353.25 | +2.01% | 914.5B | 26.28 | ₹13.29 | N/A |
| AIIL.BO | ₹493.05 | -1.70% | 422.1B | 11.61 | ₹42.80 | +0.30% |
| PEL.BO | ₹1,124.60 | +0.25% | 254.9B | 44.24 | ₹25.42 | +0.98% |
| INDIGRID-IV.NS | ₹164.74 | +0.19% | 156.7B | N/A | N/A | +9.79% |
| INDIGRID.NS | ₹164.74 | +15.24% | 118.7B | 42.20 | ₹3.37 | +8.51% |
| ELCIDIN.BO | ₹109,002.05 | -0.66% | 21.9B | 16.83 | ₹6,509.87 | +0.02% |
Stock Comparison
GANHOLD.BO vs BAJAJFINSV.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, BAJAJFINSV.BO has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while BAJAJFINSV.BO trades at ₹2,049.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas BAJAJFINSV.BO's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BAJAJFINSV.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJFINSV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check BAJAJFINSV.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs BAJAJFINSV.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, BAJAJFINSV.NS has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while BAJAJFINSV.NS trades at ₹2,049.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas BAJAJFINSV.NS's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BAJAJFINSV.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJFINSV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check BAJAJFINSV.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs ABCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, ABCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 914.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while ABCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹353.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas ABCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ABCAPITAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to ABCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check ABCAPITAL.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs ABCAPITAL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, ABCAPITAL.BO has a market cap of 914.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while ABCAPITAL.BO trades at ₹353.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas ABCAPITAL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ABCAPITAL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to ABCAPITAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check ABCAPITAL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs AIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, AIIL.BO has a market cap of 422.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while AIIL.BO trades at ₹493.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas AIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to AIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check AIIL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs PEL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, PEL.BO has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while PEL.BO trades at ₹1,124.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas PEL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to PEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check PEL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs INDIGRID-IV.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, INDIGRID-IV.NS has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while INDIGRID-IV.NS trades at ₹164.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas INDIGRID-IV.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INDIGRID-IV.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGRID-IV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check INDIGRID-IV.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs INDIGRID.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, INDIGRID.NS has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while INDIGRID.NS trades at ₹164.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas INDIGRID.NS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INDIGRID.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGRID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check INDIGRID.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs ELCIDIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, ELCIDIN.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while ELCIDIN.BO trades at ₹109,002.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas ELCIDIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ELCIDIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to ELCIDIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check ELCIDIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs ZSARACOM.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, ZSARACOM.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while ZSARACOM.BO trades at ₹10,377.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas ZSARACOM.BO's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZSARACOM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to ZSARACOM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check ZSARACOM.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs CENTRUM.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, CENTRUM.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while CENTRUM.NS trades at ₹23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas CENTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CENTRUM.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to CENTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check CENTRUM.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs CENTRUM.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, CENTRUM.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while CENTRUM.BO trades at ₹24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas CENTRUM.BO's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CENTRUM.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to CENTRUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check CENTRUM.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs CREST.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, CREST.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while CREST.NS trades at ₹358.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas CREST.NS's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CREST.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to CREST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check CREST.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs CREST.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, CREST.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while CREST.BO trades at ₹353.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas CREST.BO's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CREST.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to CREST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check CREST.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs RELCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, RELCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while RELCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas RELCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RELCAPITAL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to RELCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check RELCAPITAL.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs IVC.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, IVC.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while IVC.BO trades at ₹7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas IVC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to IVC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check IVC.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs IVC.NS Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, IVC.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while IVC.NS trades at ₹7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas IVC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to IVC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check IVC.NS's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs YASTF.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, YASTF.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while YASTF.BO trades at ₹157.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas YASTF.BO's P/E ratio is 194.44. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YASTF.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to YASTF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check YASTF.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs ABVL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, ABVL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while ABVL.BO trades at ₹7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas ABVL.BO's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ABVL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to ABVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check ABVL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs GLOBUSCON.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, GLOBUSCON.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while GLOBUSCON.BO trades at ₹12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas GLOBUSCON.BO's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GLOBUSCON.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to GLOBUSCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check GLOBUSCON.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs INTELLCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, INTELLCAP.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while INTELLCAP.BO trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas INTELLCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 1097.56. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTELLCAP.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to INTELLCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check INTELLCAP.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs ZMILGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, ZMILGFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while ZMILGFIN.BO trades at ₹57.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas ZMILGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZMILGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to ZMILGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check ZMILGFIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs RSDFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, RSDFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while RSDFIN.BO trades at ₹94.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas RSDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RSDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to RSDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check RSDFIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs AGVENTURES.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, AGVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while AGVENTURES.BO trades at ₹113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas AGVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AGVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to AGVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check AGVENTURES.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs FERVENTSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, FERVENTSYN.BO has a market cap of 946M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while FERVENTSYN.BO trades at ₹19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas FERVENTSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FERVENTSYN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to FERVENTSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check FERVENTSYN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs APOORVA.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, APOORVA.BO has a market cap of 720.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while APOORVA.BO trades at ₹36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas APOORVA.BO's P/E ratio is -360.80. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APOORVA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to APOORVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check APOORVA.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs YAMNINV.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, YAMNINV.BO has a market cap of 699.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while YAMNINV.BO trades at ₹0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas YAMNINV.BO's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YAMNINV.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to YAMNINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check YAMNINV.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs REGIS.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, REGIS.BO has a market cap of 658.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while REGIS.BO trades at ₹2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas REGIS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REGIS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to REGIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check REGIS.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MORGAN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MORGAN.BO has a market cap of 581.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MORGAN.BO trades at ₹60.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MORGAN.BO's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MORGAN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MORGAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MORGAN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs TOYAMSL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, TOYAMSL.BO has a market cap of 537.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while TOYAMSL.BO trades at ₹0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas TOYAMSL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TOYAMSL.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to TOYAMSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check TOYAMSL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs NCLRESE.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, NCLRESE.BO has a market cap of 449.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while NCLRESE.BO trades at ₹0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas NCLRESE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCLRESE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to NCLRESE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check NCLRESE.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs LERTHAI.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, LERTHAI.BO has a market cap of 405.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while LERTHAI.BO trades at ₹550.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas LERTHAI.BO's P/E ratio is -165.57. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LERTHAI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to LERTHAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check LERTHAI.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MIL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MIL.BO has a market cap of 337M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MIL.BO trades at ₹33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MIL.BO's P/E ratio is 3370.00. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to MIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MIL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs KKFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, KKFIN.BO has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while KKFIN.BO trades at ₹58.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas KKFIN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KKFIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to KKFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check KKFIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs OASISEC.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, OASISEC.BO has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while OASISEC.BO trades at ₹16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas OASISEC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OASISEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to OASISEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check OASISEC.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MONOT.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MONOT.BO has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MONOT.BO trades at ₹0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MONOT.BO's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MONOT.BO's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MONOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MONOT.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs KARTKIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, KARTKIN.BO has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while KARTKIN.BO trades at ₹1,256.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas KARTKIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KARTKIN.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to KARTKIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check KARTKIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs QGO.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, QGO.BO has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while QGO.BO trades at ₹41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas QGO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QGO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to QGO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check QGO.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs JOHNPHARMA.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, JOHNPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while JOHNPHARMA.BO trades at ₹0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas JOHNPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JOHNPHARMA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to JOHNPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check JOHNPHARMA.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs TCFCFINQ.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, TCFCFINQ.BO has a market cap of 291.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while TCFCFINQ.BO trades at ₹25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas TCFCFINQ.BO's P/E ratio is 132.33. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TCFCFINQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to TCFCFINQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check TCFCFINQ.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MARGOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MARGOFIN.BO has a market cap of 274.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MARGOFIN.BO trades at ₹61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MARGOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 176.50. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MARGOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to MARGOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MARGOFIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs INDCEMCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, INDCEMCAP.BO has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while INDCEMCAP.BO trades at ₹12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas INDCEMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 156.25. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INDCEMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to INDCEMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check INDCEMCAP.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MORARKFI.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MORARKFI.BO has a market cap of 262.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MORARKFI.BO trades at ₹59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MORARKFI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MORARKFI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MORARKFI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MORARKFI.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs EASUN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, EASUN.BO has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while EASUN.BO trades at ₹49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas EASUN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.93. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EASUN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to EASUN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check EASUN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs STRLGUA.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, STRLGUA.BO has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while STRLGUA.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas STRLGUA.BO's P/E ratio is -136.84. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STRLGUA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to STRLGUA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check STRLGUA.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs SWRNASE.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, SWRNASE.BO has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while SWRNASE.BO trades at ₹77.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas SWRNASE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWRNASE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to SWRNASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check SWRNASE.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs HRMNYCP.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, HRMNYCP.BO has a market cap of 241.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while HRMNYCP.BO trades at ₹80.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas HRMNYCP.BO's P/E ratio is -66.55. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HRMNYCP.BO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to HRMNYCP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check HRMNYCP.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs INVIGO.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, INVIGO.BO has a market cap of 232.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while INVIGO.BO trades at ₹5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas INVIGO.BO's P/E ratio is -96.17. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INVIGO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to INVIGO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check INVIGO.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs SOUTLAT.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, SOUTLAT.BO has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while SOUTLAT.BO trades at ₹29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas SOUTLAT.BO's P/E ratio is 91.47. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SOUTLAT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to SOUTLAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check SOUTLAT.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs BOMTALKIES.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, BOMTALKIES.BO has a market cap of 225.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while BOMTALKIES.BO trades at ₹4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas BOMTALKIES.BO's P/E ratio is -104.25. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BOMTALKIES.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to BOMTALKIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check BOMTALKIES.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs GLOBALCA.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, GLOBALCA.BO has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while GLOBALCA.BO trades at ₹0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas GLOBALCA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GLOBALCA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to GLOBALCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check GLOBALCA.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs PRESSURS.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, PRESSURS.BO has a market cap of 195.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while PRESSURS.BO trades at ₹1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas PRESSURS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRESSURS.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to PRESSURS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check PRESSURS.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs SHYMINV.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, SHYMINV.BO has a market cap of 179.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while SHYMINV.BO trades at ₹12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas SHYMINV.BO's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SHYMINV.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to SHYMINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check SHYMINV.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs CHITRTX.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, CHITRTX.BO has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while CHITRTX.BO trades at ₹119.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas CHITRTX.BO's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CHITRTX.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to CHITRTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check CHITRTX.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs GSLSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, GSLSEC.BO has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while GSLSEC.BO trades at ₹53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas GSLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -54.70. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GSLSEC.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to GSLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check GSLSEC.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs DFL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, DFL.BO has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while DFL.BO trades at ₹44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas DFL.BO's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DFL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to DFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check DFL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs PRISMMEDI.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, PRISMMEDI.BO has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while PRISMMEDI.BO trades at ₹26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas PRISMMEDI.BO's P/E ratio is -355.43. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRISMMEDI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to PRISMMEDI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check PRISMMEDI.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs GARBIFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, GARBIFIN.BO has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while GARBIFIN.BO trades at ₹12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas GARBIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GARBIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to GARBIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check GARBIFIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs CITL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, CITL.BO has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while CITL.BO trades at ₹0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas CITL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CITL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to CITL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check CITL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs TOKYOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, TOKYOFIN.BO has a market cap of 143.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while TOKYOFIN.BO trades at ₹20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas TOKYOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 342.50. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TOKYOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check TOKYOFIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MINOLTAF.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MINOLTAF.BO has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MINOLTAF.BO trades at ₹1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MINOLTAF.BO's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MINOLTAF.BO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MINOLTAF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MINOLTAF.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs ECSTSTL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, ECSTSTL.BO has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while ECSTSTL.BO trades at ₹20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas ECSTSTL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ECSTSTL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to ECSTSTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check ECSTSTL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs GALADAFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, GALADAFIN.BO has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while GALADAFIN.BO trades at ₹26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas GALADAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GALADAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to GALADAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check GALADAFIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MFSINTRCRP.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MFSINTRCRP.BO has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MFSINTRCRP.BO trades at ₹18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MFSINTRCRP.BO's P/E ratio is -39.35. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MFSINTRCRP.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to MFSINTRCRP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MFSINTRCRP.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs AGARWAL.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, AGARWAL.BO has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while AGARWAL.BO trades at ₹22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas AGARWAL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AGARWAL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to AGARWAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check AGARWAL.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs JAYBHCR.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, JAYBHCR.BO has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while JAYBHCR.BO trades at ₹15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas JAYBHCR.BO's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JAYBHCR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to JAYBHCR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check JAYBHCR.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MLINDLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MLINDLTD.BO has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MLINDLTD.BO trades at ₹10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MLINDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLINDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MLINDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MLINDLTD.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs AMERISE.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, AMERISE.BO has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while AMERISE.BO trades at ₹0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas AMERISE.BO's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMERISE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to AMERISE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check AMERISE.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs KUBERJI.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, KUBERJI.BO has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while KUBERJI.BO trades at ₹11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas KUBERJI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KUBERJI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to KUBERJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check KUBERJI.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs MAHANIN.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, MAHANIN.BO has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while MAHANIN.BO trades at ₹9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas MAHANIN.BO's P/E ratio is -106.56. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MAHANIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MAHANIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check MAHANIN.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs BEEYU.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, BEEYU.BO has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while BEEYU.BO trades at ₹2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas BEEYU.BO's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BEEYU.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is less volatile compared to BEEYU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check BEEYU.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs SHYAMAINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, SHYAMAINFO.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while SHYAMAINFO.BO trades at ₹7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas SHYAMAINFO.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SHYAMAINFO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAMAINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check SHYAMAINFO.BO's competition here
GANHOLD.BO vs SHYAM.BO Comparison February 2026
GANHOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GANHOLD.BO stands at 57.2M. In comparison, SHYAM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GANHOLD.BO is priced at ₹63.35, while SHYAM.BO trades at ₹8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GANHOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -24.79, whereas SHYAM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GANHOLD.BO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SHYAM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GANHOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GANHOLD.BO.Check SHYAM.BO's competition here