FAX Capital Corp.
FAX Capital Corp. (FXC.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FXC.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXC.TO | CA$5.17 | +0.00% | 0 | -73.86 | -CA$0.07 | N/A |
| GS.NE | CA$38.57 | -2.53% | 317.5B | 15.62 | CA$2.47 | +1.95% |
| GLXY.TO | CA$28.26 | -4.69% | 11B | -33.64 | -CA$0.84 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | CA$65.80 | -6.07% | 7.3B | -22.46 | -CA$2.93 | N/A |
| BITF.TO | CA$2.74 | -2.84% | 1.5B | -15.22 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| CF.TO | CA$11.46 | +0.35% | 1.2B | -5.26 | -CA$2.18 | +2.97% |
| CF-PC.TO | CA$24.31 | -0.78% | 1.1B | 11.25 | CA$2.16 | +2.97% |
| DEFI.NE | CA$0.68 | -11.69% | 218.2M | 67.00 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| XAU.TO | CA$16.29 | -0.24% | 205.7M | 4.89 | CA$3.33 | N/A |
| CXI.TO | CA$24.18 | -3.74% | 144.7M | 7.58 | CA$3.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FXC.TO vs GS.NE Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 317.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while GS.NE trades at CA$38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check GS.NE's competition here
FXC.TO vs GLXY.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while GLXY.TO trades at CA$28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is -33.64. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check GLXY.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs HUT.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while HUT.TO trades at CA$65.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -22.46. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check HUT.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs BITF.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while BITF.TO trades at CA$2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check BITF.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs CF.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while CF.TO trades at CA$11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check CF.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs CF-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while CF-PC.TO trades at CA$24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check CF-PC.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs DEFI.NE Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while DEFI.NE trades at CA$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check DEFI.NE's competition here
FXC.TO vs XAU.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 205.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while XAU.TO trades at CA$16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check XAU.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs CXI.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while CXI.TO trades at CA$24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check CXI.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs RICH.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while RICH.CN trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO and RICH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RICH.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs PNP.TO Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while PNP.TO trades at CA$8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check PNP.TO's competition here
FXC.TO vs BIGG.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while BIGG.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check BIGG.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs HODL.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while HODL.CN trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check HODL.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs BIGG.V Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BIGG.V has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while BIGG.V trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas BIGG.V's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIGG.V's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to BIGG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check BIGG.V's competition here
FXC.TO vs FRNT.V Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while FRNT.V trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check FRNT.V's competition here
FXC.TO vs BTC.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while BTC.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check BTC.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs SIX.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SIX.CN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while SIX.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO and SIX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIX.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs SATO.V Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SATO.V has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while SATO.V trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas SATO.V's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATO.V's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to SATO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check SATO.V's competition here
FXC.TO vs HOLD.NE Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while HOLD.NE trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check HOLD.NE's competition here
FXC.TO vs MATA.V Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MATA.V has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while MATA.V trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas MATA.V's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MATA.V's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO is less volatile compared to MATA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FXC.TO.Check MATA.V's competition here
FXC.TO vs ARM.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while ARM.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO and ARM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARM.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs CODE.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while CODE.CN trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO and CODE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CODE.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs GBC.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while GBC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO and GBC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBC.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs SPIR.CN Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while SPIR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +33.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO and SPIR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPIR.CN's competition here
FXC.TO vs BKMT.V Comparison April 2026
FXC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FXC.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BKMT.V has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FXC.TO is priced at CA$5.17, while BKMT.V trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FXC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -73.86, whereas BKMT.V's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FXC.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKMT.V's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FXC.TO and BKMT.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKMT.V's competition here