Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumalation
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumalation FWRG.L Peers
See (FWRG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWRG.L | £548.10 | +1.14% | 1.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UC65.L | £60.85 | +2.08% | 5.5T | N/A | N/A | +1.65% |
| UB02.L | £4,442.00 | +2.33% | 4T | N/A | N/A | +1.80% |
| IUSA.L | £4,507.75 | +1.50% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.06% |
| SSAC.L | £7,134.00 | +1.31% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | £43,245.00 | +1.51% | 1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,331.00 | +1.50% | 838.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,797.72 | +1.87% | 784.3B | N/A | N/A | +2.73% |
| XESC.L | £7,905.00 | +1.92% | 784.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £22,235.00 | +1.51% | 767.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FWRG.L vs UC65.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UC65.L trades at £60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs UB02.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UB02.L trades at £4,442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IUSA.L trades at £4,507.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SSAC.L trades at £7,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while EQGB.L trades at £43,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 838.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SMEA.L trades at £7,331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XESX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 784.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XESX.L trades at £4,797.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XESC.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 784.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XESC.L trades at £7,905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 767.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while MEUD.L trades at £22,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IITU.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 765.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IITU.L trades at £2,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 734.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UB0D.L trades at £2,218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 681.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while JPSR.L trades at £1,993.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs JT13.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 657.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while JT13.L trades at £589.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 632B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CNAL.L trades at £11,191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 550.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IWRD.L trades at £6,254.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 537.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XDAX.L trades at £19,274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 486.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XMMS.L trades at £4,774.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 485.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while PHGP.L trades at £22,295.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 473.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while GLDA.L trades at £9,534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 464B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while MXWS.L trades at £9,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 440.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XMUS.L trades at £13,458.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs UC44.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 425.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UC44.L trades at £12,838.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 415.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XMEU.L trades at £8,373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CS51.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 411.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CS51.L trades at £17,264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs EUE.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 368.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while EUE.L trades at £4,683.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 365.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IEEM.L trades at £3,495.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs UB32.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 350.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UB32.L trades at £8,949.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CACX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 338.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CACX.L trades at £6,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 304.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SEMA.L trades at £3,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 302.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XSX6.L trades at £11,773.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 289.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,335.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 288.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while GBSS.L trades at £22,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 272.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IWFV.L trades at £3,650.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 264.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SGBX.L trades at £23,004.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 252B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while ISPY.L trades at £2,362.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 235.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CEA1.L trades at £15,024.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 227.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while RBTX.L trades at £1,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 220.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs JERE.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 219.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while JERE.L trades at £3,905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while JRDE.L trades at £3,663.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SUES.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 219.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SUES.L trades at £613.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 205.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while PHSP.L trades at £2,406.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 199.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IUQF.L trades at £1,110.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 197.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while HMEF.L trades at £893.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 195.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IWFM.L trades at £6,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 183.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XDEV.L trades at £3,761.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 176.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SOYU.L trades at £304.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 170.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CEUR.L trades at £30,970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 168.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UIFS.L trades at £1,112.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 166.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XXSC.L trades at £5,591.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SPGP.L trades at £1,709.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,435.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 149.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while PRIR.L trades at £1,483.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while GBSP.L trades at £1,689.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CU1.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 141.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CU1.L trades at £46,553.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IEFV.L trades at £869.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while ISP6.L trades at £6,537.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs WATL.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while WATL.L trades at £5,808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IPRP.L trades at £2,729.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs GILS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while GILS.L trades at £10,236.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 129.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CUS1.L trades at £38,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XZEU.L trades at £2,807.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XCX6.L trades at £1,318.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs UC79.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UC79.L trades at £1,153.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SP5G.L trades at £209.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 65.18. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs INFL.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CSPX.L trades at £661.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CG1.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 118.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CG1.L trades at £36,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 117.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while 0GWB.IL trades at £475.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CB5.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 114.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CB5.L trades at £3,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XRSG.L trades at £23,425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 110.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IJPN.L trades at £1,407.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 109.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while JRDM.L trades at £2,378.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IGSG.L trades at £5,927.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while PRIC.L trades at £1,627.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IWDA.L trades at £117.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SPEX.L trades at £4,464.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XDEM.L trades at £5,555.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs SPES.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while SPES.L trades at £4,201.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs H50E.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while H50E.L trades at £4,867.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while RIEG.L trades at £1,438.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IEUX.L trades at £4,017.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while DAXX.L trades at £18,796.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IMV.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IMV.L trades at £5,722.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs TRXS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while TRXS.L trades at £3,385.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CSCA.L trades at £17,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while MTIX.L trades at £14,306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,428.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs UB45.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while UB45.L trades at £6,193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IUKD.L trades at £831.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XLKQ.L trades at £54,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XDN0.L trades at £4,210.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while WQDS.L trades at £551.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while EQDS.L trades at £542.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CRPX.L trades at £13,082.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while CSP1.L trades at £48,264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while IGUS.L trades at £14,157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs COMM.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while COMM.L trades at £533.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
FWRG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 82.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG.L is priced at £548.10, while XDEB.L trades at £3,555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.L.