Formula One Group
Formula One Group FWONK Peers
See (FWONK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWONK | $102.93 | +0.08% | 32.7B | 2058.60 | $0.05 | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,190.08 | -3.50% | 506.5B | 50.73 | $23.46 | N/A |
| DIS | $121.06 | +0.18% | 217.7B | 24.71 | $4.90 | +0.82% |
| LYV | $150.97 | +1.02% | 35B | 51.34 | $2.94 | N/A |
| FWONA | $93.30 | +0.21% | 32.7B | 1866.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
| WBD | $12.85 | +0.39% | 31.8B | -2.92 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOXA | $55.91 | +0.79% | 24.1B | 13.84 | $4.04 | +0.97% |
| FOX | $51.37 | +0.59% | 24B | 12.72 | $4.04 | +0.97% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.52% |
| NWSA | $29.43 | +0.93% | 17.5B | 35.90 | $0.82 | +0.68% |
Stock Comparison
FWONK vs NFLX Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 506.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while NFLX trades at $1,190.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 50.73. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs DIS Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 217.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while DIS trades at $121.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LYV Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LYV trades at $150.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 51.34. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs FWONA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while FWONA trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1866.00. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs WBD Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while WBD trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs FOXA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while FOXA trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs FOX Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while FOX trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs VIAC Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs NWSA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while NWSA trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs NWS Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while NWS trades at $33.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 41.06. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs WMG Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while WMG trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 36.56. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs TKO Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while TKO trades at $166.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 84.53. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs ROKU Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while ROKU trades at $89.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -122.67. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs EDR Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs PARA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while PARA trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs PARAA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while PARAA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs PARAP Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs WWE Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs SIRI Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while SIRI trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LLYVK Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LLYVK trades at $82.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 304.89. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LLYVA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LLYVA trades at $80.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 286.86. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs NXST Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while NXST trades at $184.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs MSGS Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while MSGS trades at $204.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 1025.20. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CNK Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CNK trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs MANU Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while MANU trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -34.64. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs BATRA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while BATRA trades at $49.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -151.59. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs BATRK Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while BATRK trades at $46.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -141.30. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs APE Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs MSGE Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while MSGE trades at $40.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LGF-B Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LGF-A Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs IQ Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while IQ trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 49.75. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LION Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LION trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs BOWL Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs SPHR Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while SPHR trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs AMC Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while AMC trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs IMAX Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while IMAX trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 61.35. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs PLAY Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while PLAY trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs SBGI Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while SBGI trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs HUYA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 821.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while HUYA trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs MCS Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while MCS trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -43.24. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs RSVR Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 510M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while RSVR trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 64.92. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs AENT Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while AENT trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs AMCX Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while AMCX trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LIVX Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs GNUS Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs GAIA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while GAIA trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CNVS Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CNVS trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNVS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LVO Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LVO trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LVO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs AGAE Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while AGAE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs NIPG Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while NIPG trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs RSVRW Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while RSVRW trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CIDM Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CIDM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs RDIB Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while RDIB trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs RDI Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while RDI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs TOON Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while TOON trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs ANGH Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while ANGH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs ANGHW Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs ADD Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while ADD trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs BREA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while BREA trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BREA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs MMV Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs DLPN Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while DLPN trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs AENTW Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while AENTW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CPOP Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CPOP trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CSCW Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs KUKE Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while KUKE trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs HOFV Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while HOFV trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs BLMZ Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while BLMZ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CSSE Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs BZFDW Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while BZFDW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CSSEP Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CSSEL Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs CSSEN Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs HOFVW Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs RDBX Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs ESGC Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs LVOPP Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FWONK has daily volatility of 1.72 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.
FWONK vs RDBXW Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs HMTV Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs EMWP Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs AESE Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs MSGN Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs VIACA Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs VIACP Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs DISCB Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.
FWONK vs DISCK Comparison
FWONK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWONK stands at 32.7B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWONK is priced at $102.93, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWONK currently has a P/E ratio of 2058.60, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, FWONK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWONK is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWONK.