Flow Metals Corp.
Flow Metals Corp. FWM.CN Peers
See (FWM.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWM.CN | $0.06 | +20.00% | 802308.00 | -2.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | $72.77 | +3.96% | 80.99B | 11.85 | $6.14 | +1.92% |
| AEM.TO | $156.75 | +5.34% | 79.24B | 23.82 | $6.58 | +1.42% |
| WPM.TO | $115.44 | +5.17% | 52.37B | 60.76 | $1.90 | +0.76% |
| ABX.TO | $26.00 | +4.25% | 44.71B | 14.05 | $1.85 | +2.14% |
| FNV.TO | $228.87 | +2.78% | 44.08B | 50.86 | $4.50 | +0.89% |
| K.TO | $20.00 | +4.22% | 24.61B | 14.60 | $1.37 | +0.84% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | $35.54 | +3.68% | 14.95B | 40.85 | $0.87 | +0.28% |
| LUG.TO | $60.23 | +6.39% | 14.48B | 19.43 | $3.10 | +1.86% |
Stock Comparison
FWM.CN vs NGT.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 80.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NGT.TO trades at $72.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs AEM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 79.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while AEM.TO trades at $156.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs WPM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 52.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while WPM.TO trades at $115.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 60.76. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ABX.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 44.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ABX.TO trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs FNV.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 44.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while FNV.TO trades at $228.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 50.86. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs K.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 24.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while K.TO trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs NCM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs AGI.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while AGI.TO trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs LUG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 14.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while LUG.TO trades at $60.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs EDV.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while EDV.TO trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -67.12. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs YRI.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs OR.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while OR.TO trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 141.71. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs BTO.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while BTO.TO trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ELD.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ELD.TO trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs IMG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while IMG.TO trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs NGD.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NGD.TO trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs PRU.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while PRU.TO trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs OLA.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while OLA.TO trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs EQX.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while EQX.TO trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs OGC.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while OGC.TO trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs TXG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while TXG.TO trades at $42.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SSL.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SSL.TO trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 83.64. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs DPM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while DPM.TO trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs KNT.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while KNT.TO trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SSRM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SSRM.TO trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs CEE.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FWM.CN vs CXB.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CXB.TO trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs WDO.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while WDO.TO trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs WGX.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while WGX.TO trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ORA.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ORA.TO trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs NG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NG.TO trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -25.70. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs CG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CG.TO trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs AAUC.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while AAUC.TO trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs OSK.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SEA.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SEA.TO trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -113.40. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs CNL.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CNL.TO trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.96. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs RUP.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while RUP.TO trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -171.67. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SBB.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs KRR.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs GTWO.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 793.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while GTWO.TO trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -82.50. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs MSA.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 719.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while MSA.TO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs AR.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ORE.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 567.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ORE.TO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ASE.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 521.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ASE.CN trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs GAU.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 488.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while GAU.TO trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs MND.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 452.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while MND.TO trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs PRB.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 440.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while PRB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SGD.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FWM.CN vs FDR.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 412.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while FDR.V trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -35.54. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs MOZ.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs IAU.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 336.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while IAU.TO trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SBI.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 265.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SBI.TO trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs JAG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 262.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while JAG.TO trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -30.09. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs STGO.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 217.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while STGO.TO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs GOLD.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 211.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ITH.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 197.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ITH.TO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -31.67. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs DNG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 196.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while DNG.TO trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs FF.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 178.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while FF.TO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs VGZ.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 169.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs LN.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 145.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while LN.TO trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs LGD.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 136.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while LGD.TO trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs TNX.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SANU.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 118.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SANU.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs COG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs GHRT.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 111.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while GHRT.V trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs NEXG.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 109.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NEXG.V trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs MAW.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs BSX.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 95.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while BSX.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs CBR.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 94.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CBR.V trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs XTG.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 94.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while XTG.TO trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 205.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ELO.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 93.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ELO.TO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs STLR.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 89.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while STLR.TO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs G.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 87.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while G.TO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs CCM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 66.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CCM.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs BLLG.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 65.21M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs TML.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while TML.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FWM.CN vs CGC.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 61.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CGC.V trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs HMR.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 61.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while HMR.V trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs ME.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs VEIN.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 50.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while VEIN.V trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FWM.CN vs ESM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 46.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while ESM.TO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs USGD.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 42.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while USGD.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs NHK.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs BNN.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs NVO.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 37.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NVO.TO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs VLC.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs VGCX.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SGNL.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs GTCH.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 27.74M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs AMM.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 26.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while AMM.TO trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs GRC.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 22.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while GRC.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN and GRC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FWM.CN vs VAU.V Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 21.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while VAU.V trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs PME.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 18.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while PME.TO trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs CTOC.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs SGLD.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs YRB.TO Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 16.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while YRB.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN and YRB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FWM.CN vs NOM.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 16.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while NOM.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs HWG.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 15.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while HWG.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.
FWM.CN vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
FWM.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWM.CN stands at 802308.00. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 15.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FWM.CN is priced at $0.06, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, FWM.CN's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWM.CN is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWM.CN.