Fortress Value Acquisition Corp. III

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CCIV has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CCIV trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CCIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCIV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to CCIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, PSACU has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while PSACU trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas PSACU's P/E ratio is -108.79. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSACU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to PSACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, RTPY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while RTPY trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas RTPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTPY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to RTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, LVRAW has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while LVRAW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas LVRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LVRAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to LVRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CMLFU has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CMLFU trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CMLFU's P/E ratio is -1444.44. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMLFU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to CMLFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, PSAC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while PSAC trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas PSAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSAC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to PSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GRSVU has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GRSVU trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GRSVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRSVU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to GRSVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, APSG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while APSG trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas APSG's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APSG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to APSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, RTP has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while RTP trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas RTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTP's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to RTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DGNR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DGNR trades at $9.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DGNR's P/E ratio is -308.67. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, VTIQ has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while VTIQ trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas VTIQ's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTIQ's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to VTIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, VTIQU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while VTIQU trades at $10.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas VTIQU's P/E ratio is 100.60. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTIQU's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to VTIQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, VACQ has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while VACQ trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas VACQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VACQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to VACQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SVFC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SVFC trades at $9.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SVFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVFC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SVFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, VGAC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while VGAC trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas VGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VGAC's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to VGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CMLT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CMLT trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CMLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMLT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to CMLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GHVI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GHVI trades at $14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GHVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GHVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to GHVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, KVSB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while KVSB trades at $11.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas KVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KVSB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to KVSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FTOCU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FTOCU trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FTOCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FTOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, THCBU has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while THCBU trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas THCBU's P/E ratio is -101.87. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THCBU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to THCBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CLII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CLII trades at $14.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLII's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to CLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GRNV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GRNV trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GRNV's P/E ratio is -59.68. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRNV's ROE of -101981.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to GRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FRX trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, HOLUU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while HOLUU trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas HOLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOLUU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to HOLUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SSPK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SSPK trades at $18.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SSPK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSPK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SSPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FCACU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FCACU trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FCACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCACU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FCACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CFVI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CFVI trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CFVI's P/E ratio is -18.55. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFVI's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to CFVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, HOL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while HOL trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas HOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to HOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SYM trades at $29.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -371.75. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, THCB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while THCB trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas THCB's P/E ratio is -81.30. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THCB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to THCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SOAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SOAC trades at $10.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SOAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SOAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FUSE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FUSE trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FUSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUSE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FUSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DCRBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DCRBU trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DCRBU's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCRBU's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DCRBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, IVAN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while IVAN trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas IVAN's P/E ratio is -698.18. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to IVAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GWAC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GWAC trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to GWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, LCYAU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while LCYAU trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas LCYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LCYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to LCYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, APXTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while APXTU trades at $13.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas APXTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APXTU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to APXTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FWAA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FWAA trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FWAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FWAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GSAH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GSAH trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GSAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to GSAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, LCY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while LCY trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas LCY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to LCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FORE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FORE trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FORE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, APXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while APXT trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas APXT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APXT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to APXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, RAAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while RAAC trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas RAAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to RAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SPNV has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SPNV trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SPNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPNV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SPNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DNAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DNAC trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DNAC's P/E ratio is -37.72. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DNAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FAII has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FAII trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FAII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAII's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DMYI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DMYI trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DMYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMYI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DMYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, LOKB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while LOKB trades at $13.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas LOKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOKB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to LOKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, STPC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while STPC trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas STPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STPC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to STPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, MUDS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while MUDS trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas MUDS's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to MUDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, MUDSU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while MUDSU trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas MUDSU's P/E ratio is -1125.56. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUDSU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to MUDSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, TINV has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while TINV trades at $11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas TINV's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TINV's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to TINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CMII has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CMII trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to CMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DWAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DWAC trades at $49.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DWAC's P/E ratio is -73.46. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWAC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DWACU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DWACU trades at $61.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DWACU's P/E ratio is -451.10. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWACU's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DWACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, ATHN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while ATHN trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas ATHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATHN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to ATHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GMII has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GMII trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMII's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to GMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SVACU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SVACU trades at $9.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SVACU's P/E ratio is -22.89. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVACU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SVACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, MOTV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while MOTV trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas MOTV's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOTV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to MOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SVAC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SVAC trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SVAC's P/E ratio is -32.05. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVAC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CBAH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CBAH trades at $10.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CBAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to CBAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GXGXU has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GXGXU trades at $11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GXGXU's P/E ratio is -23.73. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GXGXU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to GXGXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, AONE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while AONE trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas AONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AONE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to AONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SNPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SNPR trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SNPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNPR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SNPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SPFR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SPFR trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SPFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPFR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SPFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DEH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DEH trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, ROT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while ROT trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas ROT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to ROT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, NGAC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while NGAC trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas NGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to NGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, GXGX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while GXGX trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas GXGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GXGX's ROE of -3.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to GXGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, HECCU has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while HECCU trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas HECCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HECCU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to HECCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, ATMR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while ATMR trades at $10.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas ATMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATMR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to ATMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SFTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SFTW trades at $11.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SFTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFTW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, ENFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while ENFA trades at $9.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas ENFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENFA's ROE of -825.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to ENFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, ENVI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while ENVI trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas ENVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to ENVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DFNS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DFNS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DFNS's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, ACTD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while ACTD trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas ACTD's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACTD's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to ACTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, VCKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while VCKA trades at $9.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas VCKA's P/E ratio is 100.11. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VCKA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to VCKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, THMA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while THMA trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas THMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to THMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, LNFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while LNFA trades at $10.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas LNFA's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNFA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to LNFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FTIVU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FTIVU trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FTIVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTIVU's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FTIVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, STWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while STWO trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas STWO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STWO's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to STWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, HYACU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while HYACU trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas HYACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYACU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to HYACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FTIV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FTIV trades at $13.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FTIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTIV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FTIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, AHAC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while AHAC trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas AHAC's P/E ratio is -72.11. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHAC's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to AHAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, AMHC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while AMHC trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas AMHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to AMHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, HERA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while HERA trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas HERA's P/E ratio is 46.32. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HERA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to HERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, HERAW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while HERAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas HERAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HERAW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to HERAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FGNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FGNA trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FGNA's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FGNA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to FGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, DNAA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while DNAA trades at $14.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas DNAA's P/E ratio is -54.53. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to DNAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, RACA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while RACA trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas RACA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RACA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to RACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, TREB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while TREB trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas TREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TREB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to TREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, PACE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while PACE trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas PACE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PACE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to PACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, HERAU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while HERAU trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas HERAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HERAU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to HERAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, LSAQ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while LSAQ trades at $9.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas LSAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to LSAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SRAC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SRAC trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SRAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRAC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SRAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, FTPAW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while FTPAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas FTPAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTPAW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to FTPAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, SBG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while SBG trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas SBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBG's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to SBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, MTAL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while MTAL trades at $12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas MTAL's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTAL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is less volatile compared to MTAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.

FVT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVT stands at 0. In comparison, CVII-WT has a market cap of 977.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVT is priced at $10.05, while CVII-WT trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.56, whereas CVII-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVII-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVT is more volatile compared to CVII-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVT.