Fidelity US Quality Income ETF
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF FUSD.L Peers
See (FUSD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUSD.L | £11.16 | +0.02% | 1.6B | 24.12 | £0.47 | +0.79% |
| UINC.L | £2,395.50 | +0.00% | 33.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.11% |
| DEM.L | £1,189.00 | +0.00% | 11.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.54% |
| DEMS.L | £2,190.50 | +0.00% | 11.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EEI.L | £1,157.40 | +0.00% | 4.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.54% |
| EEIP.L | £1,839.10 | +0.00% | 4.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JGGI.L | £547.00 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 5.59 | £0.98 | +4.16% |
| GINC.L | £3,770.00 | +0.00% | 2.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.70% |
| FUSA.L | £13.36 | +0.04% | 2.1B | 24.21 | £0.56 | N/A |
| FUSP.L | £10.57 | +0.05% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FUSD.L vs UINC.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UINC.L has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while UINC.L trades at £2,395.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas UINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to UINC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DEM.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DEM.L has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DEM.L trades at £1,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DEMS.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DEMS.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DEMS.L trades at £2,190.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DEMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DEMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs EEI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EEI.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while EEI.L trades at £1,157.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas EEI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to EEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs EEIP.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EEIP.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while EEIP.L trades at £1,839.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas EEIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to EEIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JGGI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JGGI.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JGGI.L trades at £547.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JGGI.L's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGGI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to JGGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs GINC.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GINC.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while GINC.L trades at £3,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas GINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to GINC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FUSA.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FUSA.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FUSA.L trades at £13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FUSA.L's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FUSP.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FUSP.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FUSP.L trades at £10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FUSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to FUSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FGT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FGT.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FGT.L trades at £903.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FGT.L's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FGT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs SEQI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SEQI.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while SEQI.L trades at £81.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas SEQI.L's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEQI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to SEQI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FUQA.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FUQA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FUQA.L trades at £974.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FUQA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUQA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FUQA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FUSI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FUSI.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FUSI.L trades at £814.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FUSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to FUSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs WUKD.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WUKD.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while WUKD.L trades at £464.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas WUKD.L's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to WUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JSET.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JSET.L has a market cap of 964.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JSET.L trades at £92.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JSET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to JSET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FGQP.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FGQP.L has a market cap of 862.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FGQP.L trades at £8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FGQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FGQP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs TFIF.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TFIF.L has a market cap of 853.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while TFIF.L trades at £112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas TFIF.L's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFIF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to TFIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MUT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MUT.L has a market cap of 840.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MUT.L trades at £854.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MUT.L's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to MUT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs SOI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOI.L has a market cap of 666.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while SOI.L trades at £287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas SOI.L's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to SOI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JPSA.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JPSA.L has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JPSA.L trades at £120.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JPSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to JPSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JPST.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JPST.L has a market cap of 644.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JPST.L trades at £101.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JPST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to JPST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FGQD.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FGQD.L has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FGQD.L trades at £689.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FGQD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs SEIT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SEIT.L has a market cap of 607.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while SEIT.L trades at £56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas SEIT.L's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to SEIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs BSIF.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BSIF.L has a market cap of 583.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while BSIF.L trades at £97.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas BSIF.L's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSIF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to BSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JEGI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JEGI.L has a market cap of 514.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JEGI.L trades at £122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JEGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEGI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to JEGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JPAS.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JPAS.L has a market cap of 472.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JPAS.L trades at £87.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JPAS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPAS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to JPAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JETI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JETI.L has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JETI.L trades at £175.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JETI.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to JETI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs UIND.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UIND.L has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while UIND.L trades at £32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas UIND.L's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to UIND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs HFEL.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HFEL.L has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while HFEL.L trades at £226.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas HFEL.L's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to HFEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs NAIT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NAIT.L has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while NAIT.L trades at £325.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas NAIT.L's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIT.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to NAIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JEMI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JEMI.L has a market cap of 394.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JEMI.L trades at £144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JEMI.L's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEMI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to JEMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DIG.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DIG.L has a market cap of 386.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DIG.L trades at £301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DIG.L's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIG.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs BIPS.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BIPS.L has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while BIPS.L trades at £172.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas BIPS.L's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIPS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to BIPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs HINT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HINT.L has a market cap of 343.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while HINT.L trades at £175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas HINT.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to HINT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs CTUK.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTUK.L has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while CTUK.L trades at £332.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas CTUK.L's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTUK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to CTUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs AAIF.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AAIF.L has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while AAIF.L trades at £223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas AAIF.L's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAIF.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to AAIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs CMHY.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CMHY.L has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while CMHY.L trades at £176.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas CMHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMHY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to CMHY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs HHI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HHI.L has a market cap of 309.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while HHI.L trades at £180.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas HHI.L's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to HHI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JAGI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JAGI.L has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JAGI.L trades at £377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JAGI.L's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to JAGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs CCJI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CCJI.L has a market cap of 260M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while CCJI.L trades at £194.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas CCJI.L's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCJI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to CCJI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs ASLI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASLI.L has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while ASLI.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas ASLI.L's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASLI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to ASLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs SMIF.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMIF.L has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while SMIF.L trades at £86.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas SMIF.L's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMIF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to SMIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DIVI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DIVI.L has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DIVI.L trades at £104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DIVI.L's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIVI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DIVI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs AERI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AERI.L has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while AERI.L trades at £0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas AERI.L's P/E ratio is -7.82. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AERI.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to AERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FA17.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FA17.L has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FA17.L trades at £0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FA17.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FA17.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to FA17.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FAIR.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FAIR.L has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FAIR.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FAIR.L's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAIR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FAIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs SCF.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCF.L has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while SCF.L trades at £309.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas SCF.L's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCF.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to SCF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JGSA.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JGSA.L has a market cap of 212.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JGSA.L trades at £116.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JGSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to JGSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JGST.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JGST.L has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JGST.L trades at £101.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JGST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to JGST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs HEIT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HEIT.L has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while HEIT.L trades at £92.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas HEIT.L's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEIT.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to HEIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs CCJS.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CCJS.L has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while CCJS.L trades at £0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas CCJS.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCJS.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to CCJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs IGV.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IGV.L has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while IGV.L trades at £61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas IGV.L's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGV.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to IGV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JCGI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JCGI.L has a market cap of 195.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JCGI.L trades at £233.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JCGI.L's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to JCGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs TORO.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TORO.L has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while TORO.L trades at £0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas TORO.L's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TORO.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to TORO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DHSD.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DHSD.L has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DHSD.L trades at £25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DHSD.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHSD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DHSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs SGQD.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SGQD.L has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while SGQD.L trades at £331.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas SGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to SGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs ASIZ.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASIZ.L has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while ASIZ.L trades at £126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas ASIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASIZ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to ASIZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MGCI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGCI.L has a market cap of 172.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MGCI.L trades at £95.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MGCI.L's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGCI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L and MGCI.L have similar daily volatility (0.63).
FUSD.L vs IVPG.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IVPG.L has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while IVPG.L trades at £272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas IVPG.L's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVPG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to IVPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs AEI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AEI.L has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while AEI.L trades at £353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas AEI.L's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to AEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MIX.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIX.L has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MIX.L trades at £48.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MIX.L's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIX.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to MIX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs TIGT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TIGT.L has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while TIGT.L trades at £69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas TIGT.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to TIGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs ASIT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASIT.L has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while ASIT.L trades at £83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas ASIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASIT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to ASIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs PGOO.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PGOO.L has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while PGOO.L trades at £48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas PGOO.L's P/E ratio is -24.05. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGOO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to PGOO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DEMD.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DEMD.L has a market cap of 154M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DEMD.L trades at £16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DEMD.L's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs BRSA.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRSA.L has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while BRSA.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas BRSA.L's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRSA.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to BRSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DHSA.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DHSA.L has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DHSA.L trades at £30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DHSA.L's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DHSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs GABI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GABI.L has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while GABI.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas GABI.L's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GABI.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to GABI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DHS.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DHS.L has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DHS.L trades at £1,835.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to DHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MCT.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MCT.L has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MCT.L trades at £129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MCT.L's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCT.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to MCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs ADIG.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADIG.L has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while ADIG.L trades at £45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas ADIG.L's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADIG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to ADIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs CVCG.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CVCG.L has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while CVCG.L trades at £119.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas CVCG.L's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVCG.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to CVCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs BERI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BERI.L has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while BERI.L trades at £114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas BERI.L's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BERI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to BERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs CYN.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CYN.L has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while CYN.L trades at £199.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas CYN.L's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to CYN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs HDIV.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HDIV.L has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while HDIV.L trades at £66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas HDIV.L's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FUSD.L has daily volatility of 0.63 and HDIV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
FUSD.L vs FEMD.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FEMD.L has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FEMD.L trades at £4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FEMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs SHRS.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SHRS.L has a market cap of 115.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while SHRS.L trades at £292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas SHRS.L's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHRS.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to SHRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs DHSP.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DHSP.L has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while DHSP.L trades at £2,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas DHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to DHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs CMPI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CMPI.L has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while CMPI.L trades at £112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas CMPI.L's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMPI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to CMPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs GRIW.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRIW.L has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while GRIW.L trades at £19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas GRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRIW.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to GRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FEMQ.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FEMQ.L has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FEMQ.L trades at £5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FEMQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to FEMQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MAV4.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MAV4.L has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MAV4.L trades at £55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MAV4.L's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAV4.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to MAV4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs VIP.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VIP.L has a market cap of 84.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while VIP.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas VIP.L's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to VIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MIG4.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIG4.L has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MIG4.L trades at £68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MIG4.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG4.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to MIG4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MATE.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MATE.L has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MATE.L trades at £103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MATE.L's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MATE.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to MATE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MIG5.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIG5.L has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MIG5.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MIG5.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to MIG5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs RMII.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RMII.L has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while RMII.L trades at £70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas RMII.L's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMII.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to RMII.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MIG1.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIG1.L has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MIG1.L trades at £36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MIG1.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG1.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to MIG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MIG3.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIG3.L has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MIG3.L trades at £46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MIG3.L's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to MIG3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs JEFI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JEFI.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while JEFI.L trades at £94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas JEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEFI.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to JEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs ASCI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASCI.L has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while ASCI.L trades at £238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas ASCI.L's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASCI.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to ASCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs MIG.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIG.L has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while MIG.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas MIG.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to MIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs RCOI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RCOI.L has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while RCOI.L trades at £0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas RCOI.L's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCOI.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to RCOI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs EEIA.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EEIA.L has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while EEIA.L trades at £21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas EEIA.L's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to EEIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FEQP.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FEQP.L has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FEQP.L trades at £8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FEQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FEQP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs BRIG.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRIG.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while BRIG.L trades at £201.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas BRIG.L's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRIG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to BRIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs FEUI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FEUI.L has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while FEUI.L trades at £5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas FEUI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEUI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is less volatile compared to FEUI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs ALAI.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALAI.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while ALAI.L trades at £62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas ALAI.L's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALAI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to ALAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L vs EDIV.L Comparison
FUSD.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUSD.L stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EDIV.L has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUSD.L is priced at £11.16, while EDIV.L trades at £10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUSD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.12, whereas EDIV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUSD.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDIV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUSD.L is more volatile compared to EDIV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUSD.L.