Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc FUQA.L Peers
See (FUQA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUQA.L | £961.88 | +0.20% | 1.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UINC.L | £2,376.00 | -0.41% | 32.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.24% |
| DEMS.L | £2,136.50 | +0.29% | 11.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DEM.L | £1,167.50 | +0.28% | 11B | N/A | N/A | +5.87% |
| EEI.L | £1,138.30 | +0.24% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +4.62% |
| EEIP.L | £1,808.60 | +0.27% | 4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JGGI.L | £534.00 | +0.75% | 2.8B | 5.45 | £0.98 | +4.27% |
| GINC.L | £3,792.00 | -0.20% | 2.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.63% |
| FUSA.L | £13.05 | +0.46% | 2B | 23.44 | £0.56 | N/A |
| FUSD.L | £10.92 | +0.74% | 1.5B | 23.40 | £0.47 | +0.81% |
Stock Comparison
FUQA.L vs UINC.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UINC.L has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while UINC.L trades at £2,376.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to UINC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DEMS.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DEMS.L has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DEMS.L trades at £2,136.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to DEMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DEM.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DEM.L has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DEM.L trades at £1,167.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to DEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs EEI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EEI.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while EEI.L trades at £1,138.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to EEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs EEIP.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EEIP.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while EEIP.L trades at £1,808.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to EEIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JGGI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JGGI.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JGGI.L trades at £534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGGI.L's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGGI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to JGGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs GINC.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GINC.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while GINC.L trades at £3,792.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to GINC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FUSA.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUSA.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FUSA.L trades at £13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSA.L's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FUSD.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUSD.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FUSD.L trades at £10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSD.L's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to FUSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FUSP.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUSP.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FUSP.L trades at £10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FUSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FGT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FGT.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FGT.L trades at £916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGT.L's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to FGT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs SEQI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SEQI.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while SEQI.L trades at £80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEQI.L's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEQI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to SEQI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FUSI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUSI.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FUSI.L trades at £803.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FUSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs WUKD.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WUKD.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while WUKD.L trades at £464.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WUKD.L's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to WUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JSET.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JSET.L has a market cap of 945.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JSET.L trades at £90.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to JSET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FGQP.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FGQP.L has a market cap of 842.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FGQP.L trades at £8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FGQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MUT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MUT.L has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MUT.L trades at £857.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUT.L's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to MUT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs TFIF.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TFIF.L has a market cap of 836.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while TFIF.L trades at £111.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFIF.L's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFIF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to TFIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JPST.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JPST.L has a market cap of 644.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JPST.L trades at £101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to JPST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JPSA.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JPSA.L has a market cap of 644.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JPSA.L trades at £119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to JPSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs SOI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SOI.L has a market cap of 643.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while SOI.L trades at £277.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOI.L's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to SOI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FGQD.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FGQD.L has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FGQD.L trades at £681.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs BSIF.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BSIF.L has a market cap of 553.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while BSIF.L trades at £93.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSIF.L's P/E ratio is -46.75. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSIF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to BSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JEGI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JEGI.L has a market cap of 510.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JEGI.L trades at £121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEGI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to JEGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs SEIT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SEIT.L has a market cap of 479.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while SEIT.L trades at £44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEIT.L's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to SEIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JPAS.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JPAS.L has a market cap of 475.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JPAS.L trades at £88.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPAS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPAS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to JPAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JETI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JETI.L has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JETI.L trades at £175.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JETI.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to JETI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs UIND.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UIND.L has a market cap of 409.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while UIND.L trades at £32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIND.L's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to UIND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DIG.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DIG.L has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DIG.L trades at £300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIG.L's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIG.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to DIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs NAIT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NAIT.L has a market cap of 388.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while NAIT.L trades at £320.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIT.L's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIT.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to NAIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JEMI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JEMI.L has a market cap of 386.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JEMI.L trades at £142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEMI.L's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEMI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to JEMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs HFEL.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HFEL.L has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while HFEL.L trades at £217.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFEL.L's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to HFEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs BIPS.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIPS.L has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while BIPS.L trades at £172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPS.L's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIPS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to BIPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs HINT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HINT.L has a market cap of 343.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while HINT.L trades at £175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINT.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HINT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to HINT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs CTUK.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CTUK.L has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while CTUK.L trades at £333.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTUK.L's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTUK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to CTUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs CMHY.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CMHY.L has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while CMHY.L trades at £176.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMHY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to CMHY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs AAIF.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AAIF.L has a market cap of 309.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while AAIF.L trades at £214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAIF.L's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAIF.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to AAIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs HHI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HHI.L has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while HHI.L trades at £180.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHI.L's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to HHI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs 0P0000X63U.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0P0000X63U.L has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while 0P0000X63U.L trades at £1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000X63U.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000X63U.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000X63U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JAGI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JAGI.L has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JAGI.L trades at £369.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to JAGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs CCJI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CCJI.L has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while CCJI.L trades at £189.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCJI.L's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCJI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to CCJI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs ASLI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASLI.L has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while ASLI.L trades at £59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLI.L's P/E ratio is 59.40. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASLI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to ASLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs SMIF.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMIF.L has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while SMIF.L trades at £86.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMIF.L's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMIF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to SMIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs AERI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AERI.L has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while AERI.L trades at £0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERI.L's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AERI.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to AERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DIVI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DIVI.L has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DIVI.L trades at £101.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIVI.L's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIVI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to DIVI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FA17.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FA17.L has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FA17.L trades at £0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FA17.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FA17.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FA17.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FAIR.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FAIR.L has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FAIR.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAIR.L's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAIR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FAIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs SCF.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SCF.L has a market cap of 213M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while SCF.L trades at £307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCF.L's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCF.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to SCF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JGST.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JGST.L has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JGST.L trades at £101.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to JGST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JGSA.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JGSA.L has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JGSA.L trades at £115.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to JGSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs HEIT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HEIT.L has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while HEIT.L trades at £91.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEIT.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEIT.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to HEIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs CCJS.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CCJS.L has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while CCJS.L trades at £0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCJS.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCJS.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to CCJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs IGV.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IGV.L has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while IGV.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGV.L's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGV.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to IGV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs TORO.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TORO.L has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while TORO.L trades at £0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TORO.L's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TORO.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to TORO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JCGI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JCGI.L has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JCGI.L trades at £228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCGI.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to JCGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs SGQD.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGQD.L has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while SGQD.L trades at £331.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to SGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs ASIZ.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASIZ.L has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while ASIZ.L trades at £126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASIZ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to ASIZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs IVPG.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IVPG.L has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while IVPG.L trades at £272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPG.L's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVPG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to IVPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DHSD.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DHSD.L has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DHSD.L trades at £24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHSD.L's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHSD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to DHSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MIX.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIX.L has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MIX.L trades at £50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIX.L's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIX.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to MIX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs AEI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AEI.L has a market cap of 166.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while AEI.L trades at £348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEI.L's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to AEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs CVCG.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CVCG.L has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while CVCG.L trades at £118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVCG.L's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVCG.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to CVCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MGCI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MGCI.L has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MGCI.L trades at £95.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGCI.L's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGCI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to MGCI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs TIGT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TIGT.L has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while TIGT.L trades at £69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGT.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to TIGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs ASIT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASIT.L has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while ASIT.L trades at £83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASIT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to ASIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs PGOO.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PGOO.L has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while PGOO.L trades at £48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGOO.L's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGOO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to PGOO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DEMD.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DEMD.L has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DEMD.L trades at £15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEMD.L's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to DEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs BRSA.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BRSA.L has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while BRSA.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSA.L's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRSA.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to BRSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs GABI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GABI.L has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while GABI.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GABI.L's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GABI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to GABI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MCT.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCT.L has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MCT.L trades at £128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCT.L's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCT.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to MCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs BERI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BERI.L has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while BERI.L trades at £112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BERI.L's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BERI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to BERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs CYN.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CYN.L has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while CYN.L trades at £204.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYN.L's P/E ratio is -29.21. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to CYN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs ADIG.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ADIG.L has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while ADIG.L trades at £45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADIG.L's P/E ratio is -45.10. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADIG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to ADIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DHSA.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DHSA.L has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DHSA.L trades at £30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHSA.L's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to DHSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DHS.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DHS.L has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DHS.L trades at £1,818.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to DHS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs HDIV.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HDIV.L has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while HDIV.L trades at £66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIV.L's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FUQA.L has daily volatility of 0.63 and HDIV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
FUQA.L vs FEMD.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEMD.L has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FEMD.L trades at £4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs SHRS.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHRS.L has a market cap of 106.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while SHRS.L trades at £265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHRS.L's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHRS.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to SHRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs CMPI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CMPI.L has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while CMPI.L trades at £115.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPI.L's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMPI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to CMPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs DHSP.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DHSP.L has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while DHSP.L trades at £2,223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to DHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs GRIW.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRIW.L has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while GRIW.L trades at £19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRIW.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to GRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FEMQ.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEMQ.L has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FEMQ.L trades at £4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEMQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FEMQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MAV4.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAV4.L has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MAV4.L trades at £55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAV4.L's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAV4.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to MAV4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs VIP.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VIP.L has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while VIP.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIP.L's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to VIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MIG4.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIG4.L has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MIG4.L trades at £68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIG4.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG4.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to MIG4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MATE.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MATE.L has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MATE.L trades at £103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATE.L's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MATE.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to MATE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs RMII.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RMII.L has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while RMII.L trades at £73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMII.L's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMII.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to RMII.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MIG5.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIG5.L has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MIG5.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIG5.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to MIG5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MIG1.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIG1.L has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MIG1.L trades at £37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIG1.L's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG1.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to MIG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MIG3.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIG3.L has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MIG3.L trades at £46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIG3.L's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to MIG3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs JEFI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JEFI.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while JEFI.L trades at £94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEFI.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is less volatile compared to JEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs ASCI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASCI.L has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while ASCI.L trades at £238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASCI.L's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASCI.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to ASCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs MIG.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIG.L has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while MIG.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIG.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to MIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs RCOI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RCOI.L has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while RCOI.L trades at £0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCOI.L's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCOI.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to RCOI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs EEIA.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EEIA.L has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while EEIA.L trades at £21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEIA.L's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to EEIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FEQP.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEQP.L has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FEQP.L trades at £8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FEQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs BRIG.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BRIG.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while BRIG.L trades at £205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRIG.L's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRIG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to BRIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs FEUI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEUI.L has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while FEUI.L trades at £5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEUI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEUI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to FEUI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L vs ALAI.L Comparison
FUQA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUQA.L stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALAI.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, FUQA.L is priced at £961.88, while ALAI.L trades at £62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUQA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAI.L's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, FUQA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALAI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUQA.L is more volatile compared to ALAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUQA.L.