Subaru Corporation
Subaru Corporation FUJHF Peers
See (FUJHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUJHF | $19.08 | +5.94% | 13.95B | 5.05 | $3.78 | +4.08% |
TOYOF | $19.25 | +1.64% | 251.19B | 7.24 | $2.66 | +3.19% |
BYDDF | $53.19 | +6.91% | 161.61B | 25.21 | $2.11 | +0.82% |
BYDDY | $106.18 | +6.95% | 81.57B | 25.04 | $4.24 | +0.81% |
VWAGY | $11.47 | +0.44% | 57.52B | 5.46 | $2.10 | +10.16% |
VWAPY | $11.22 | +0.40% | 57.28B | 5.34 | $2.10 | +9.65% |
VLKPF | $108.70 | +0.46% | 57.16B | 5.18 | $21.00 | +9.99% |
VLKAF | $114.06 | -0.82% | 56.68B | 5.43 | $20.99 | +9.46% |
MBGAF | $58.60 | +1.91% | 56.43B | 5.71 | $10.26 | +9.15% |
MBGYY | $14.64 | +1.60% | 56.39B | 5.72 | $2.56 | +5.67% |
Stock Comparison
FUJHF vs TOYOF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 251.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while TOYOF trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BYDDF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 161.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BYDDF trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BYDDY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 81.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BYDDY trades at $106.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs VWAGY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 57.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while VWAGY trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs VWAPY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 57.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while VWAPY trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs VLKPF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 57.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while VLKPF trades at $108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs VLKAF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 56.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while VLKAF trades at $114.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs MBGAF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 56.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while MBGAF trades at $58.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs MBGYY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 56.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while MBGYY trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BAMXF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 55.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BAMXF trades at $89.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BYMOF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 54.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BYMOF trades at $76.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs DRPRF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 48.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while DRPRF trades at $52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs HNDAF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 45.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while HNDAF trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs MAHMF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 42.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while MAHMF trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs TYIDY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 36.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while TYIDY trades at $122.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs HYMTF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 36.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while HYMTF trades at $51.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs TYIDF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 36.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while TYIDF trades at $119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs SZKMF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 24.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while SZKMF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs GELYF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 24.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while GELYF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs GELYY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 24.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while GELYY trades at $48.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs SZKMY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 24.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while SZKMY trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs DRPRY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 24.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while DRPRY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs GWLLF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 23.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while GWLLF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs HYMLF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs XPNGF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 20.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while XPNGF trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs EXXRF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while EXXRF trades at $94.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BMWYY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs FOVSY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 17.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while FOVSY trades at $124.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 103.26. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs RNLSY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 15.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while RNLSY trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs RNSDF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 14.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while RNSDF trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs GWLLY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 14.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while GWLLY trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs FUJHY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while FUJHY trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs POAHF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while POAHF trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs YAMHY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ISUZY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ISUZY trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ISUZF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ISUZF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs GNZUF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while GNZUF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NIOIF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NIOIF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NSANY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NSANY trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NSANF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NSANF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSANF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs JCYGY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while JCYGY trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs YMHAY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while YMHAY trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs YAMHF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while YAMHF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs JCYCF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while JCYCF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs POAHY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while POAHY trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs VLVOF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while VLVOF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs VLVCY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while VLVCY trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs IVCGF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while IVCGF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs DNFGY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while DNFGY trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 532.20. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs DNFGF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs YADGF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while YADGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs MZDAF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while MZDAF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs MZDAY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while MZDAY trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs MMTOF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while MMTOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs SMEBF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while SMEBF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BCCMY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BCCMY trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BMCLF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs HINOY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while HINOY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs BCAUF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while BCAUF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs HINOF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while HINOF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NFYEF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NFYEF trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -346.33. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs AMGDF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while AMGDF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ARGGY Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 958.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ARGGY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NSNHF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs PIAGF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 710.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while PIAGF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs KRSOF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs RIDEQ Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs FHYDF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 25.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while FHYDF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs SEVCF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 21.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while SEVCF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NRDE Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 21.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NRDE trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ELMSQ Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ELMWQ Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs LFEV Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while LFEV trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs GKIT Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while GKIT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs EVTGF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs FSRNQ Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ELEK Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 930629.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ELEK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ELCR Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681583.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs TUGAF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 386816.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs RONN Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228179.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs GACR Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104560.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs CSBI Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 32318.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while CSBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ELIO Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14196.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NVYAF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8693.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs ARVLF Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 3675.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.
FUJHF vs NDVR Comparison
FUJHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUJHF stands at 13.95B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUJHF is priced at $19.08, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUJHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FUJHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUJHF is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUJHF.