Global Compliance Applications Corp.
Global Compliance Applications Corp. FUAPF Peers
See (FUAPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUAPF | $0.00 | +70.00% | 1.06M | -0.34 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $18.60 | +1.42% | 58.58B | 56.36 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,779.68 | -3.90% | 56.05B | 53.69 | $33.15 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $57.03 | -1.18% | 35.56B | 13.98 | $4.08 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.68B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +6.37% |
| TOITF | $125.69 | +0.01% | 10.44B | 94.50 | $1.33 | N/A |
| TMICY | $73.70 | +1.07% | 9.68B | 43.87 | $1.68 | +1.34% |
| TMICF | $70.00 | N/A | 9.20B | 40.23 | $1.74 | +1.66% |
| NEXXY | $6.00 | +2.43% | 7.59B | 37.50 | $0.16 | N/A |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | -0.08% | 7.36B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
FUAPF vs ADYEY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 58.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 56.36. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs ADYYF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 56.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,779.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 53.69. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs BSQKZ Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 35.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $57.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs KAKZF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TOITF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $125.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 94.50. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TMICY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 9.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $73.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TMICF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 9.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs NEXXY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs NEXPF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DRKTY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs GMYTF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $50.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SWDAF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs STWRY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CIOXY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs EXNWF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs WWLNF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs OVHFF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 155.78. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DRKTF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs WRDLY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SPNUF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SANP Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs MGPPF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.33. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs PHPYF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs EXOD Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, EXOD has a market cap of 962.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while EXOD trades at $33.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EXOD's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EXOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to EXOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CPLFF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs PRTHU Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 643.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs FNCHF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 592.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs PYPTF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 557.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DYNDF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 431.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TDCSF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs HISNF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 415.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs YHEKF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 406.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SPMYY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 372.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 115.33. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs NFONF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CORZQ Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TYPMF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 283.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SERKF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 260.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -30.57. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs FFPP Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs FMZNF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 246.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs OTPMF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs ABANF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SEEMF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 217.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs FSOYF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs GIVXF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CGAAY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs PYFRF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs ERDLF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 108.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs FCLOF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs BGOPF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 96.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs HAIVF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 87.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CORZR Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 83.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs VRSSF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 66.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CROTF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs WHEN Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 55.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DGGXF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 50.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SKKY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 50.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs QBITF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs NTTCF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs NOWVF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 41.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -49.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs JGHG Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 40.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs APGT Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APGT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs ISDCF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 33.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CLOQ Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 30.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TFLM Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 21.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs POTTF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CLPMF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 15.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs CYBNY Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SDCH Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 11.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs PLCKF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 11.45M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs QFEEF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs EPXGF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DLTXF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DRKOF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SCYRF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 7.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DSAIF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs IPNFF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs FOBIF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 6.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SFIIF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs RKNEF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 4.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs DVPNF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs VENZF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 3.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs PKKFF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 3.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TGCB Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 3.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs NBVAF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 3.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs OVTZ Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs KCRD Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 3.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs MODGF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs RIHT Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs VISM Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs TONR Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs ATCHW Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while ATCHW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SLXXF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is less volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs RCWDF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs INOTF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771006.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs INAR Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769327.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs MBLMF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 767936.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs FSRDQ Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683114.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs SMKG Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 574783.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.
FUAPF vs ITNF Comparison
FUAPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUAPF stands at 1.06M. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 563143.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUAPF is priced at $0.00, while ITNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUAPF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUAPF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUAPF is more volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUAPF.