Fortis Inc. CUM RD 5Y SR G
Fortis Inc. CUM RD 5Y SR G (FTRSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FTRSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTRSF | $18.41 | +0.00% | 9.3B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| NGGTF | $18.72 | -0.00% | 92B | 22.85 | $0.81 | +3.40% |
| ELEZY | $20.00 | +0.00% | 43.3B | 16.87 | $1.23 | +3.18% |
| ELEZF | $40.00 | +12.83% | 41.7B | 16.33 | $2.45 | +3.57% |
| NSARO | $83.00 | +0.00% | 30.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| NSARP | $71.90 | +0.00% | 29.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| AILIO | $69.89 | -0.01% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.55% |
| AILIP | $66.98 | -0.81% | 25.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.55% |
| HRNNF | $42.27 | +2.18% | 25.4B | 25.93 | $1.63 | +2.23% |
| CLPHY | $9.92 | +0.00% | 24.3B | 16.60 | $0.58 | +3.83% |
Stock Comparison
FTRSF vs NGGTF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while NGGTF trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and NGGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGGTF's competition here
FTRSF vs ELEZY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ELEZY trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check ELEZY's competition here
FTRSF vs ELEZF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ELEZF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and ELEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEZF's competition here
FTRSF vs NSARO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while NSARO trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARO's competition here
FTRSF vs NSARP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while NSARP trades at $71.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARP's competition here
FTRSF vs AILIO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while AILIO trades at $69.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIO's competition here
FTRSF vs AILIP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while AILIP trades at $66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and AILIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIP's competition here
FTRSF vs HRNNF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HRNNF trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check HRNNF's competition here
FTRSF vs CLPHY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CLPHY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check CLPHY's competition here
FTRSF vs TERRF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while TERRF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and TERRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERRF's competition here
FTRSF vs CLPHF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CLPHF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPHF's competition here
FTRSF vs TEZNY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while TEZNY trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check TEZNY's competition here
FTRSF vs CKISY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CKISY trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CKISY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISY's competition here
FTRSF vs TNABY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while TNABY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and TNABY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNABY's competition here
FTRSF vs TNABF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while TNABF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check TNABF's competition here
FTRSF vs CKISF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CKISF trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CKISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISF's competition here
FTRSF vs ELIAF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ELIAF trades at $142.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and ELIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIAF's competition here
FTRSF vs EMRAF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check EMRAF's competition here
FTRSF vs MAEOY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while MAEOY trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and MAEOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAEOY's competition here
FTRSF vs ENEAY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ENEAY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ENEAY trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENEAY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENEAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and ENEAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENEAY's competition here
FTRSF vs RDEIY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while RDEIY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check RDEIY's competition here
FTRSF vs EQUEY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while EQUEY trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and EQUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQUEY's competition here
FTRSF vs UEPCO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while UEPCO trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and UEPCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCO's competition here
FTRSF vs FORFF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while FORFF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORFF's competition here
FTRSF vs IESFY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while IESFY trades at $194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check IESFY's competition here
FTRSF vs UEPCN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while UEPCN trades at $77.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCN's competition here
FTRSF vs UEPEP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while UEPEP trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and UEPEP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEP's competition here
FTRSF vs UEPEO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while UEPEO trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and UEPEO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEO's competition here
FTRSF vs HPIFF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HPIFF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFF's competition here
FTRSF vs UEPCP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while UEPCP trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCP's competition here
FTRSF vs HKVTY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and HKVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKVTY's competition here
FTRSF vs UEPEM Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while UEPEM trades at $65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and UEPEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEM's competition here
FTRSF vs UEPEN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while UEPEN trades at $62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and UEPEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEN's competition here
FTRSF vs HPIFY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HPIFY trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and HPIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFY's competition here
FTRSF vs HKCVF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKCVF's competition here
FTRSF vs CPWIF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CPWIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWIF's competition here
FTRSF vs EGIEY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while EGIEY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check EGIEY's competition here
FTRSF vs ABZPF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ABZPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and ABZPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPF's competition here
FTRSF vs HAWEM Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HAWEM trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check HAWEM's competition here
FTRSF vs WELPM Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while WELPM trades at $107.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPM's competition here
FTRSF vs ABOIF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ABOIF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and ABOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABOIF's competition here
FTRSF vs PGPKY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while PGPKY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPKY's competition here
FTRSF vs RGPCF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and RGPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGPCF's competition here
FTRSF vs WELPP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while WELPP trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and WELPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPP's competition here
FTRSF vs AILLM Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while AILLM trades at $81.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLM's competition here
FTRSF vs AILLN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while AILLN trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and AILLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLN's competition here
FTRSF vs AILIN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while AILIN trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIN's competition here
FTRSF vs AILLP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while AILLP trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and AILLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLP's competition here
FTRSF vs FPHHF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPHHF's competition here
FTRSF vs CUPUF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 569M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CUPUF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUPUF's competition here
FTRSF vs RELFF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELFF's competition here
FTRSF vs CNTHP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNTHP trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNTHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHP's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLPL Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLPL trades at $52.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check CNLPL's competition here
FTRSF vs CNTHO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNTHO trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHO's competition here
FTRSF vs ABTZY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ABTZY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABTZY's competition here
FTRSF vs CNTHN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNTHN trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHN's competition here
FTRSF vs ABZPY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ABZPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and ABZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPY's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLHO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLHO trades at $37.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNLHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHO's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLHP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLHP trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNLHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHP's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLTP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLTP trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNLTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTP's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLPM Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLPM trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPM's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLTN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLTN trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTN's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLTL Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLTL trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTL's competition here
FTRSF vs CNLHN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while CNLHN trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHN's competition here
FTRSF vs EDCFF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and EDCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDCFF's competition here
FTRSF vs NZWFF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZWFF's competition here
FTRSF vs SUME Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while SUME trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUME's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUME's competition here
FTRSF vs EUSP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while EUSP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check EUSP's competition here
FTRSF vs MCPB Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while MCPB trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and MCPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCPB's competition here
FTRSF vs HAWEN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HAWEN trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check HAWEN's competition here
FTRSF vs HAWLM Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HAWLM trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLM's competition here
FTRSF vs HAWEL Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HAWEL trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and HAWEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWEL's competition here
FTRSF vs HAWLL Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HAWLL trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check HAWLL's competition here
FTRSF vs HAWLI Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HAWLI trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and HAWLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLI's competition here
FTRSF vs HAWLN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 999.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while HAWLN trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check HAWLN's competition here
FTRSF vs RIGH Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and RIGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIGH's competition here
FTRSF vs USWF Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USWF's competition here
FTRSF vs RENU Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and RENU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RENU's competition here
FTRSF vs EPGRQ Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 15. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGRQ's competition here
FTRSF vs IPWLG Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLG's competition here
FTRSF vs BANGN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while BANGN trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BANGN's competition here
FTRSF vs EVSO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check EVSO's competition here
FTRSF vs PNMXO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while PNMXO trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and PNMXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNMXO's competition here
FTRSF vs NEWEN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while NEWEN trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and NEWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWEN's competition here
FTRSF vs ENIAY Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTRSF.Check ENIAY's competition here
FTRSF vs IPWLO Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLO's competition here
FTRSF vs IPWLN Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLN's competition here
FTRSF vs IPWLP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLP's competition here
FTRSF vs NMPWP Comparison February 2026
FTRSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTRSF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTRSF is priced at $18.41, while NMPWP trades at $56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTRSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTRSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTRSF and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPWP's competition here