FirstService Corporation

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CIGI.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while CIGI.TO trades at CA$192.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas CIGI.TO's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIGI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to CIGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BPO-PI.TO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while BPO-PI.TO trades at CA$17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas BPO-PI.TO's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPO-PI.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to BPO-PI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TCN.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while TCN.TO trades at CA$15.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas TCN.TO's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCN.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to TCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AIF.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while AIF.TO trades at CA$55.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas AIF.TO's P/E ratio is 498.45. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIF.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to AIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MEQ.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while MEQ.TO trades at CA$187.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas MEQ.TO's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEQ.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to MEQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SVI.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while SVI.TO trades at CA$4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas SVI.TO's P/E ratio is -46.11. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVI.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to SVI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, REAX.TO has a market cap of 435.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while REAX.TO trades at CA$2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas REAX.TO's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REAX.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is less volatile compared to REAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MPC.TO has a market cap of 267.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while MPC.TO trades at CA$5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas MPC.TO's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPC.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to MPC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BRE.TO has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while BRE.TO trades at CA$15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas BRE.TO's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRE.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to BRE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IVQ.TO has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while IVQ.TO trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas IVQ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IVQ.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to IVQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BEK-B.TO has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while BEK-B.TO trades at CA$12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas BEK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BEK-B.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to BEK-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EMER.CN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while EMER.CN trades at CA$0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas EMER.CN's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMER.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to EMER.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TEMP.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while TEMP.CN trades at CA$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas TEMP.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEMP.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to TEMP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.

FSV.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV.TO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BPY-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV.TO is priced at CA$268.05, while BPY-UN.TO trades at CA$23.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 61.40, whereas BPY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, FSV.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPY-UN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV.TO is more volatile compared to BPY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.TO.