F-star Therapeutics, Inc.
F-star Therapeutics, Inc. FSTX Peers
See (FSTX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTX | $7.12 | N/A | 156.51M | -3.89 | -$1.83 | N/A |
| VRTX | $436.00 | +0.46% | 111.96B | -113.84 | -$3.83 | N/A |
| REGN | $588.34 | -1.43% | 62.45B | 14.96 | $39.33 | +0.30% |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.15B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $289.96 | +0.33% | 37.81B | -137.42 | -$2.11 | N/A |
| ARGX | $587.83 | +1.10% | 35.89B | 35.89 | $16.38 | N/A |
| BNTX | $98.68 | -0.39% | 23.72B | -27.49 | -$3.59 | N/A |
| BGNE | $184.71 | +0.49% | 20.21B | -22.55 | -$8.19 | N/A |
| SMMT | $25.85 | +0.31% | 19.07B | -76.03 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| DNA-WT | $0.27 | -2.76% | 18.73B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSTX vs VRTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 111.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while VRTX trades at $436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -113.84. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs REGN Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 62.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while REGN trades at $588.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs SGEN Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ALNY Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 37.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ALNY trades at $289.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -137.42. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ARGX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 35.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ARGX trades at $587.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs BNTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 23.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while BNTX trades at $98.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -27.49. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs BGNE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs SMMT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 19.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while SMMT trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -76.03. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs DNA-WT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RPRX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 18.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RPRX trades at $32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs UTHR Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 13.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while UTHR trades at $307.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs GMAB Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 13.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while GMAB trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs KRTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs INCY Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 12.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while INCY trades at $64.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 321.23. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs EXEL Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 11.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while EXEL trades at $42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs BMRN Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while BMRN trades at $57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MRNA Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MRNA trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ASND Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ASND trades at $162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -24.81. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RXDX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs IMGN Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IMGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CORT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 8.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CORT trades at $78.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 68.43. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CERE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ROIVW Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ROIV Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ROIV trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RVMD Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RVMD trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs TECH Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while TECH trades at $46.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 56.36. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs HALO Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 6.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while HALO trades at $54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs JAZZ Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while JAZZ trades at $108.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RETA Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs BPMC Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while BPMC trades at $101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -40.44. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs VRNA Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 6.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while VRNA trades at $75.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs BBIO Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while BBIO trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MDGL Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 5.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MDGL trades at $267.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs TLX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while TLX trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 184.00. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ABCM Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ISEE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs TGTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while TGTX trades at $34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 138.28. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs NUVL Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while NUVL trades at $73.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs IONS Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while IONS trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs AXSM Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while AXSM trades at $105.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -18.20. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ADMA Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ADMA trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ALKS Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ALKS trades at $29.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ALPN Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs OPT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs PCVX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while PCVX trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MRTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RYTM Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RYTM trades at $62.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -22.27. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs SLNO Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while SLNO trades at $76.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MRUS Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MRUS trades at $55.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RYZB Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CBAY Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs SRPT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, SRPT has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while SRPT trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SRPT's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SRPT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to SRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs AKRO Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while AKRO trades at $46.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RNA Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RNA trades at $30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ACAD Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ACAD trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CYTK Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CYTK trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs PTCT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while PTCT trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs KRYS Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while KRYS trades at $125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 29.99. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ACLX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ACLX trades at $63.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs SWTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while SWTX trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs RARE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while RARE trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CRSP Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CRSP trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs VKTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while VKTX trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -23.26. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CPRX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CPRX trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MTSR Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MTSR trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MORF Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MOR Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MOR's ROE of +7.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs SRRK Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while SRRK trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs PTGX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while PTGX trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 58.54. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CRNX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CRNX trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs KDNY Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while KDNY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs LEGN Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while LEGN trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MYOV Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MYOV trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MLTX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MLTX trades at $38.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs IMVT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while IMVT trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs PRVB Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while PRVB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs APGE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while APGE trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs LBPH Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while LBPH trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs XENE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while XENE trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs DICE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while DICE trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs AAPG Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while AAPG trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs IBRX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while IBRX trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs BCRX Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, BCRX has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while BCRX trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BCRX's P/E ratio is -40.73. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BCRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to BCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs APLS Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while APLS trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs MIRM Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while MIRM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CALT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CALT trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CALT's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs VCYT Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while VCYT trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs ARWR Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while ARWR trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs VCEL Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, VCEL has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while VCEL trades at $40.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VCEL's P/E ratio is 818.40. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VCEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to VCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs BLTE Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while BLTE trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -44.85. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs NAMS Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while NAMS trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs LGND Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while LGND trades at $101.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs KNSA Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while KNSA trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is -112.04. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KNSA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs HRMY Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, HRMY has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while HRMY trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas HRMY's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to HRMY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to HRMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs DNLI Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while DNLI trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs CGON Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while CGON trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -16.96. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs KYMR Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while KYMR trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs FOLD Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while FOLD trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -69.11. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is less volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.
FSTX vs NAMSW Comparison
FSTX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSTX stands at 156.51M. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FSTX is priced at $7.12, while NAMSW trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSTX currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSTX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSTX is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSTX.