Fisker Inc.
Fisker Inc. (FSRNQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSRNQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSRNQ | $0.00 | -12.50% | 1.1M | -0.00 | -$2.73 | N/A |
| TOYOF | $17.87 | -0.68% | 242.5B | 7.65 | $2.43 | +3.31% |
| BYDDF | $14.29 | -2.66% | 111.2B | 20.08 | $0.71 | +30.59% |
| BAMXF | $98.00 | +0.00% | 58.1B | 9.14 | $10.72 | +4.89% |
| BYMOF | $91.47 | +0.00% | 56.8B | 8.53 | $10.72 | +5.52% |
| VLKPF | $105.15 | +4.10% | 56.6B | 5.34 | $19.69 | +6.81% |
| MBGAF | $56.87 | -0.75% | 54.8B | 6.97 | $8.17 | +8.50% |
| MBGYY | $14.17 | -0.35% | 54.7B | 6.96 | $2.04 | +8.45% |
| VWAGY | $10.50 | -1.22% | 54.3B | 5.43 | $1.94 | +6.81% |
| VWAPY | $10.28 | -1.63% | 54.3B | 5.30 | $1.94 | +7.03% |
Stock Comparison
FSRNQ vs TOYOF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 242.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TOYOF trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check TOYOF's competition here
FSRNQ vs BYDDF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BYDDF trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BYDDF's competition here
FSRNQ vs BAMXF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BAMXF trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BAMXF's competition here
FSRNQ vs BYMOF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BYMOF trades at $91.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BYMOF's competition here
FSRNQ vs VLKPF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VLKPF trades at $105.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check VLKPF's competition here
FSRNQ vs MBGAF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MBGAF trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check MBGAF's competition here
FSRNQ vs MBGYY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MBGYY trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check MBGYY's competition here
FSRNQ vs VWAGY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VWAGY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check VWAGY's competition here
FSRNQ vs VWAPY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VWAPY trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check VWAPY's competition here
FSRNQ vs VLKAF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VLKAF trades at $105.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check VLKAF's competition here
FSRNQ vs DRPRF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DRPRF trades at $51.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check DRPRF's competition here
FSRNQ vs MAHMF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MAHMF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check MAHMF's competition here
FSRNQ vs DRPRY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DRPRY trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check DRPRY's competition here
FSRNQ vs HNDAF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while HNDAF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check HNDAF's competition here
FSRNQ vs HYMTF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check HYMTF's competition here
FSRNQ vs TYIDF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TYIDF trades at $112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check TYIDF's competition here
FSRNQ vs TYIDY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TYIDY trades at $106.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check TYIDY's competition here
FSRNQ vs GELYF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GELYF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check GELYF's competition here
FSRNQ vs GELYY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GELYY trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check GELYY's competition here
FSRNQ vs GWLLF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GWLLF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check GWLLF's competition here
FSRNQ vs HYMLF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check HYMLF's competition here
FSRNQ vs SZKMY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SZKMY trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check SZKMY's competition here
FSRNQ vs SZKMF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SZKMF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check SZKMF's competition here
FSRNQ vs EXXRF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while EXXRF trades at $95.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check EXXRF's competition here
FSRNQ vs BMWYY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BMWYY's competition here
FSRNQ vs XPNGF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while XPNGF trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check XPNGF's competition here
FSRNQ vs GWLLY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GWLLY trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check GWLLY's competition here
FSRNQ vs FUJHY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FUJHY trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check FUJHY's competition here
FSRNQ vs FUJHF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FUJHF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check FUJHF's competition here
FSRNQ vs RNSDF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while RNSDF trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check RNSDF's competition here
FSRNQ vs BYDDY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BYDDY trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BYDDY's competition here
FSRNQ vs YAMHY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check YAMHY's competition here
FSRNQ vs POAHY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while POAHY trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check POAHY's competition here
FSRNQ vs POAHF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while POAHF trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check POAHF's competition here
FSRNQ vs RNLSY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while RNLSY trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check RNLSY's competition here
FSRNQ vs NIOIF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NIOIF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check NIOIF's competition here
FSRNQ vs ISUZY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ISUZY trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ISUZY's competition here
FSRNQ vs GNZUF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GNZUF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check GNZUF's competition here
FSRNQ vs ISUZF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ISUZF trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ISUZF's competition here
FSRNQ vs JCYCF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while JCYCF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check JCYCF's competition here
FSRNQ vs JCYGY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while JCYGY trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check JCYGY's competition here
FSRNQ vs NSANF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NSANF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check NSANF's competition here
FSRNQ vs NSANY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NSANY trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check NSANY's competition here
FSRNQ vs YMHAY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while YMHAY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check YMHAY's competition here
FSRNQ vs YAMHF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while YAMHF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check YAMHF's competition here
FSRNQ vs YADGF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while YADGF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check YADGF's competition here
FSRNQ vs VLVOF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VLVOF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 219.00. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check VLVOF's competition here
FSRNQ vs IVCGF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while IVCGF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check IVCGF's competition here
FSRNQ vs VLVCY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VLVCY trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 124.67. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check VLVCY's competition here
FSRNQ vs DNFGY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DNFGY trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 600.40. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check DNFGY's competition here
FSRNQ vs DNFGF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DNFGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check DNFGF's competition here
FSRNQ vs MZDAF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MZDAF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check MZDAF's competition here
FSRNQ vs MZDAY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MZDAY trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check MZDAY's competition here
FSRNQ vs MMTOF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MMTOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check MMTOF's competition here
FSRNQ vs SMEBF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SMEBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check SMEBF's competition here
FSRNQ vs BCCMY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BCCMY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BCCMY's competition here
FSRNQ vs BMCLF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BMCLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BMCLF's competition here
FSRNQ vs BCAUF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BCAUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check BCAUF's competition here
FSRNQ vs NFYEF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NFYEF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -447.00. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check NFYEF's competition here
FSRNQ vs HINOF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while HINOF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check HINOF's competition here
FSRNQ vs HINOY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while HINOY trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check HINOY's competition here
FSRNQ vs AMGDF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 920.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while AMGDF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check AMGDF's competition here
FSRNQ vs ARGGY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 897.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ARGGY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ARGGY's competition here
FSRNQ vs ELMWQ Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ELMWQ's competition here
FSRNQ vs NSNHF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check NSNHF's competition here
FSRNQ vs PIAGF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 805.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PIAGF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check PIAGF's competition here
FSRNQ vs FOVSY Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 772M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FOVSY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check FOVSY's competition here
FSRNQ vs KRSOF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check KRSOF's competition here
FSRNQ vs FHYDF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FHYDF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check FHYDF's competition here
FSRNQ vs RIDEQ Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check RIDEQ's competition here
FSRNQ vs NRDE Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NRDE trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ and NRDE have similar daily volatility (13.33).Check NRDE's competition here
FSRNQ vs ELMSQ Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ELMSQ's competition here
FSRNQ vs SEVCF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SEVCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check SEVCF's competition here
FSRNQ vs LFEV Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while LFEV trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check LFEV's competition here
FSRNQ vs EVTGF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check EVTGF's competition here
FSRNQ vs ELEK Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ELEK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ELEK's competition here
FSRNQ vs TUGAF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check TUGAF's competition here
FSRNQ vs ELCR Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ELCR's competition here
FSRNQ vs CSBI Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 680.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CSBI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check CSBI's competition here
FSRNQ vs GKIT Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 587.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GKIT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check GKIT's competition here
FSRNQ vs ELIO Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 283.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ELIO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ELIO's competition here
FSRNQ vs GACR Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check GACR's competition here
FSRNQ vs NVYAF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check NVYAF's competition here
FSRNQ vs ARVLF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check ARVLF's competition here
FSRNQ vs RONN Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check RONN's competition here
FSRNQ vs NDVR Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check NDVR's competition here
FSRNQ vs DDAIF Comparison August 2025
FSRNQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSRNQ stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, FSRNQ's ROE is -4.92%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSRNQ is more volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSRNQ.Check DDAIF's competition here