Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA FSNUY Peers
See (FSNUY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSNUY | $12.51 | +0.00% | 113.1B | 23.25 | $0.54 | +2.20% |
| FSNUF | $50.29 | +0.00% | 22.5B | 18.60 | $2.15 | +2.63% |
| FMCQF | $58.10 | +0.93% | 17B | 23.91 | $2.43 | +2.81% |
| JDHIY | $5.10 | +0.00% | 16.3B | 28.33 | $0.18 | N/A |
| BDUUY | $32.33 | +0.00% | 12.8B | 28.30 | $1.14 | +2.79% |
| JDHIF | $3.23 | +0.00% | 11.7B | 30.42 | $0.12 | N/A |
| BDUUF | $0.66 | +8.67% | 10.4B | 21.86 | $0.03 | +3.38% |
| BDULF | $0.62 | +0.00% | 9.8B | 20.55 | $0.03 | +3.60% |
| IHHHF | $1.19 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 15.71 | $0.07 | +5.28% |
| RMSYF | $25.18 | -0.28% | 5.8B | 503.60 | $0.05 | +2.02% |
Stock Comparison
FSNUY vs FSNUF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, FSNUF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while FSNUF trades at $50.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas FSNUF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSNUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to FSNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs FMCQF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, FMCQF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while FMCQF trades at $58.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas FMCQF's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FMCQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to FMCQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs JDHIY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, JDHIY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while JDHIY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas JDHIY's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JDHIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to JDHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BDUUY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BDUUY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BDUUY trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BDUUY's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDUUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BDUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs JDHIF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, JDHIF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while JDHIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas JDHIF's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JDHIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to JDHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BDUUF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BDUUF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BDUUF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BDUUF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDUUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BDULF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BDULF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BDULF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BDULF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDULF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BDULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs IHHHF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, IHHHF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while IHHHF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas IHHHF's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IHHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to IHHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RMSYF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RMSYF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RMSYF trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RMSYF's P/E ratio is 503.60. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RMSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to RMSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RMYHY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RMYHY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RMYHY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RMYHY's P/E ratio is 535.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RMYHY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to RMYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BUGDF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BUGDF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BUGDF trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BUGDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BUHPF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BUHPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BUHPF trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BUHPF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BUHPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BUHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs ANHGY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, ANHGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while ANHGY trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas ANHGY's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to ANHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RHCGF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RHCGF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RHCGF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RHCGF's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHCGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to RHCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MCVEY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MCVEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MCVEY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MCVEY's P/E ratio is 52.54. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCVEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MCVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MCVEF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MCVEF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MCVEF trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MCVEF's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCVEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MCVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs JXFGF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, JXFGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while JXFGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas JXFGF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JXFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to JXFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs TTALF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, TTALF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while TTALF trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas TTALF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTALF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to TTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs LTGHF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, LTGHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while LTGHF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas LTGHF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTGHF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to LTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RAFLF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RAFLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RAFLF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RAFLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to RAFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RYHTY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RYHTY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RYHTY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RYHTY's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RYHTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to RYHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs LWSCF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, LWSCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while LWSCF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas LWSCF's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LWSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to LWSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs LTGHY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, LTGHY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while LTGHY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas LTGHY's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTGHY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to LTGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RHKJF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RHKJF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RHKJF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RHKJF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHKJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to RHKJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RKAGY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RKAGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RKAGY trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RKAGY's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RKAGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to RKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NWKHY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NWKHY has a market cap of 973.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NWKHY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NWKHY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NWKHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to NWKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs EXETF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, EXETF has a market cap of 869.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while EXETF trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas EXETF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXETF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to EXETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs WHTCF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, WHTCF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while WHTCF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas WHTCF's P/E ratio is -37.39. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WHTCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to WHTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs KDGTF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, KDGTF has a market cap of 675.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while KDGTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas KDGTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KDGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to KDGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs WFHG Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, WFHG has a market cap of 471.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while WFHG trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas WFHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WFHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to WFHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs ORRRY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, ORRRY has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while ORRRY trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas ORRRY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORRRY's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to ORRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BTMDW Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BTMDW has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BTMDW trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BTMDW's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTMDW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to BTMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs ORPEF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, ORPEF has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while ORPEF trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas ORPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORPEF's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to ORPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MFCSF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MFCSF has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MFCSF trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MFCSF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MFCSF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MFCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MKLNF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MKLNF has a market cap of 217.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MKLNF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MKLNF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MKLNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MKLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs CHHHF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, CHHHF has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while CHHHF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas CHHHF's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHHHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to CHHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs COLRF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, COLRF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while COLRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas COLRF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COLRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to COLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs VTIAF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, VTIAF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while VTIAF trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas VTIAF's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTIAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to VTIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs EVGRF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, EVGRF has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while EVGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas EVGRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVGRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to EVGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MCIOF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MCIOF has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MCIOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MCIOF's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MCIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs ASSF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, ASSF has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while ASSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas ASSF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASSF's ROE of -6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to ASSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs KONEF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, KONEF has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while KONEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas KONEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KONEF's ROE of -6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to KONEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs USNU Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, USNU has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while USNU trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas USNU's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USNU's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to USNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs HQDA Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, HQDA has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while HQDA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas HQDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HQDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to HQDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NVLPF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NVLPF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NVLPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NVLPF's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVLPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to NVLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs FPCG Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, FPCG has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while FPCG trades at $1,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas FPCG's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FPCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to FPCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs XCRT Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, XCRT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while XCRT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas XCRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XCRT's ROE of +2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to XCRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NUMIF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NUMIF has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NUMIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NUMIF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NUMIF's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to NUMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs GBCS Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, GBCS has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while GBCS trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas GBCS's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBCS's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to GBCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BICX Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BICX has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BICX trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BICX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BICX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs HLYK Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, HLYK has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while HLYK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas HLYK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLYK's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to HLYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RVLWF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RVLWF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RVLWF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RVLWF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RVLWF's ROE of +3.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to RVLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs RHEP Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, RHEP has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while RHEP trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas RHEP's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHEP's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to RHEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs VLXC Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, VLXC has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while VLXC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas VLXC's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLXC's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to VLXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs JRSS Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, JRSS has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while JRSS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas JRSS's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JRSS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to JRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs GRST Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, GRST has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while GRST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas GRST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRST's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to GRST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs EPWCF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, EPWCF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while EPWCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas EPWCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPWCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to EPWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs TOKIF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, TOKIF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while TOKIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas TOKIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOKIF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to TOKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs SMAS Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, SMAS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while SMAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas SMAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to SMAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MDGP Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MDGP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MDGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MDGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDGP's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MDGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NOVC Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NOVC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NOVC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NOVC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOVC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to NOVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs PHMB Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, PHMB has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while PHMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas PHMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PHMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to PHMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs GNOW Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, GNOW has a market cap of 859.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while GNOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas GNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to GNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MSITF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MSITF has a market cap of 480K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MSITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MSITF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to MSITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NXGT Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NXGT has a market cap of 369.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NXGT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NXGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NXGT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to NXGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs ARPC Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, ARPC has a market cap of 336.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while ARPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas ARPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARPC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to ARPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs JNHMF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, JNHMF has a market cap of 301.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while JNHMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas JNHMF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JNHMF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to JNHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs DPAT Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, DPAT has a market cap of 289K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while DPAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas DPAT's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DPAT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to DPAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs KJFI Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, KJFI has a market cap of 278.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while KJFI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas KJFI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KJFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to KJFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs FCHS Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, FCHS has a market cap of 181.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while FCHS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas FCHS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCHS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to FCHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs SETO Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, SETO has a market cap of 168.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while SETO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas SETO's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SETO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to SETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BNYN Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BNYN has a market cap of 150.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BNYN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BNYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNYN's ROE of -14.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BNYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs TPIA Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, TPIA has a market cap of 113.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while TPIA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas TPIA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TPIA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to TPIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs AMBD Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, AMBD has a market cap of 85.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while AMBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas AMBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMBD's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to AMBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs GENN Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, GENN has a market cap of 49K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while GENN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas GENN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GENN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to GENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NMHLY Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NMHLY has a market cap of 41.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NMHLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NMHLY's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMHLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to NMHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs DRWN Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, DRWN has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while DRWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas DRWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRWN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to DRWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs HSMD Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, HSMD has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while HSMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas HSMD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HSMD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to HSMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs SCAL Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, SCAL has a market cap of 17.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while SCAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas SCAL's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to SCAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs CLRD Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, CLRD has a market cap of 13.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while CLRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas CLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to CLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs CHCR Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, CHCR has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while CHCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas CHCR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHCR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to CHCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs ACGI Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, ACGI has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while ACGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas ACGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACGI's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to ACGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs CEVE Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, CEVE has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while CEVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas CEVE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CEVE's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to CEVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NAFS Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NAFS has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NAFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAFS's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to NAFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NRTSF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NRTSF has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NRTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NRTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NRTSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to NRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs PRMD Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, PRMD has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while PRMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas PRMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRMD's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to PRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MSGP Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MSGP has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MSGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MSGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSGP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs ERUC Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, ERUC has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while ERUC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas ERUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERUC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to ERUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs SLHPF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, SLHPF has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while SLHPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas SLHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLHPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to SLHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs WEQL Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, WEQL has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while WEQL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas WEQL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WEQL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to WEQL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BBAL Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BBAL has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BBAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BBAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBAL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NMMCF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NMMCF has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is less volatile compared to NMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs PPRG Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, PPRG has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while PPRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas PPRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PPRG's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to PPRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs OHAQ Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, OHAQ has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while OHAQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas OHAQ's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OHAQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to OHAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs BNKL Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, BNKL has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while BNKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas BNKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNKL's ROE of -7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to BNKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs MAHN Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, MAHN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while MAHN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas MAHN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAHN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to MAHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs SLHGF Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, SLHGF has a market cap of 398. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while SLHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas SLHGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLHGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to SLHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs LHRP Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, LHRP has a market cap of 340. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while LHRP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas LHRP's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LHRP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to LHRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.
FSNUY vs NMSCA Comparison
FSNUY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSNUY stands at 113.1B. In comparison, NMSCA has a market cap of 275. Regarding current trading prices, FSNUY is priced at $12.51, while NMSCA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSNUY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.25, whereas NMSCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSNUY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMSCA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSNUY is more volatile compared to NMSCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSNUY.