FS KKR Capital Corp.
FS KKR Capital Corp. FSK Peers
See (FSK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSK | $21.78 | +0.88% | 6.1B | 11.47 | $1.90 | +12.85% |
| VOO | $573.22 | -0.36% | 1.5T | 27.20 | $21.07 | +1.21% |
| VFINX | $577.94 | -0.04% | 1.4T | 27.30 | $21.24 | +1.21% |
| VITSX | $149.50 | -0.14% | 1.3T | 26.56 | $5.65 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $149.48 | -0.14% | 1.3T | 26.56 | $5.65 | +1.21% |
| FXAIX | $217.45 | -0.34% | 639.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTI | $307.02 | -0.42% | 636.7B | 26.45 | $11.61 | +1.21% |
| IVV | $626.44 | -0.38% | 630.7B | 26.96 | $23.24 | +1.28% |
| SPY | $623.62 | -0.35% | 572.3B | 26.95 | $23.13 | +1.43% |
| VXUS | $69.00 | -0.69% | 499B | 16.53 | $4.17 | +3.53% |
Stock Comparison
FSK vs VOO Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VOO trades at $573.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VFINX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VFINX trades at $577.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VITSX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VITSX trades at $149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTSAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTSAX trades at $149.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs FXAIX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 639.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while FXAIX trades at $217.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTI Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 636.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTI trades at $307.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs IVV Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 630.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while IVV trades at $626.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs SPY Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 572.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while SPY trades at $623.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VXUS Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 499B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VXUS trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTSNX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 492.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTSNX trades at $148.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VMCPX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 357B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VMCPX trades at $380.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VIMAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 327.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VIMAX trades at $349.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VINIX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 317.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VINIX trades at $508.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VIIIX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 317.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VIIIX trades at $508.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AGTHX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 302.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AGTHX trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs GAFFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 302.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while GAFFX trades at $82.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RGAGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 302.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RGAGX trades at $83.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs GFAFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 291.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while GFAFX trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RGABX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 261.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RGABX trades at $73.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RGAAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 257.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RGAAX trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs GFACX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while GFACX trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RLBGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 244.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RLBGX trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs BALFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 243.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while BALFX trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AMBFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 242.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AMBFX trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AFMBX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 242.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AFMBX trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs ABALX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 241.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while ABALX trades at $36.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTMNX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTMNX trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VEA Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 226.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VEA trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VDIPX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 225.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VDIPX trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs QQQ Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 217.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while QQQ trades at $554.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VB Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VB trades at $242.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs BX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while BX trades at $162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTV Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 187.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTV trades at $178.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VO Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VO trades at $282.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs BLK Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 170.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while BLK trades at $1,101.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs FCTDX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while FCTDX trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs C-PN Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while C-PN trades at $30.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AICCX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 161.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AICCX trades at $62.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs FCNKX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 160.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while FCNKX trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AIVSX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 159.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AIVSX trades at $63.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RICBX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RICBX trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RICAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RICAX trades at $63.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AICFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AICFX trades at $63.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs FCNTX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while FCNTX trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs ANWPX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 150.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while ANWPX trades at $69.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs FNPFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while FNPFX trades at $70.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RNPGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RNPGX trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs NPFFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while NPFFX trades at $69.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs CFNAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 149.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while CFNAX trades at $88.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AWSHX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AWSHX trades at $64.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RWMFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 145.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RWMFX trades at $64.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs FWMIX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while FWMIX trades at $64.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs CWMAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while CWMAX trades at $64.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AFIFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AFIFX trades at $88.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs ANCFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while ANCFX trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs WSHFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 144.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while WSHFX trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs WSHCX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 142.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while WSHCX trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RWMBX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RWMBX trades at $63.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs IEFA Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while IEFA trades at $83.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AEGFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 135.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AEGFX trades at $60.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RERHX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 134.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RERHX trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RERGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RERGX trades at $60.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AEPFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AEPFX trades at $60.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AEPGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 132.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AEPGX trades at $60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AGG Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AGG trades at $98.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 125.09. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs KKR Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while KKR trades at $141.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 60.28. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs IWF Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while IWF trades at $427.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VWENX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VWENX trades at $78.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VWELX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VWELX trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VSCIX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VSCIX trades at $116.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs NAESX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while NAESX trades at $116.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs JLGMX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while JLGMX trades at $88.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VIG Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VIG trades at $205.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs SEEGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while SEEGX trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTTHX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTTHX trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VUG Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VUG trades at $441.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs FSKAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while FSKAX trades at $172.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs JLGRX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while JLGRX trades at $87.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VGT Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VGT trades at $670.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VDADX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VDADX trades at $55.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs BN Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while BN trades at $63.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 217.69. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VITAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VITAX trades at $343.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 39.73. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs TBCIX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while TBCIX trades at $203.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs TRBCX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while TRBCX trades at $201.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTHRX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTHRX trades at $40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs PABGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while PABGX trades at $194.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 38.55. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VFORX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VFORX trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs IJH Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while IJH trades at $63.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs DODGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while DODGX trades at $271.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VTIVX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VTIVX trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VIEIX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VIEIX trades at $148.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RRBGX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RRBGX trades at $181.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs BAM Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while BAM trades at $56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs RAFFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while RAFFX trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs PRUFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while PRUFX trades at $112.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 40.02. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs PRGFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while PRGFX trades at $111.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 40.01. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs VEMAX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while VEMAX trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AMCPX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AMCPX trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.
FSK vs AMPFX Comparison
FSK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSK stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSK is priced at $21.78, while AMPFX trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, FSK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSK is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSK.