Shougang Fushan Resources Group Limited
Shougang Fushan Resources Group Limited (FSHYF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSHYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSHYF | $0.34 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 8.38 | $0.04 | +11.43% |
| CSUAY | $17.88 | +0.00% | 104.9B | 11.36 | $1.57 | +5.96% |
| CUAEF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 93.9B | 10.26 | $0.39 | +7.80% |
| CCOZF | $1.18 | +0.00% | 19.1B | 6.56 | $0.18 | +5.67% |
| YZCAY | $12.10 | -0.08% | 16.4B | 6.54 | $1.85 | +8.84% |
| YZCHF | $1.19 | +18.96% | 16B | 6.61 | $0.18 | +8.96% |
| YACAF | $4.17 | +1.21% | 5.5B | 6.95 | $0.60 | +7.83% |
| IMYCF | $1.80 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 3.75 | $0.48 | N/A |
| HIIDQ | $0.91 | +0.59% | 4.2B | 0.16 | $5.54 | N/A |
| WHITF | $4.50 | +0.90% | 3.7B | 32.14 | $0.14 | +3.10% |
Stock Comparison
FSHYF vs CSUAY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSUAY has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CSUAY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CSUAY's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSUAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to CSUAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check CSUAY's competition here
FSHYF vs CUAEF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CUAEF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CUAEF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CUAEF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUAEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and CUAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUAEF's competition here
FSHYF vs CCOZF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCOZF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CCOZF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CCOZF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCOZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and CCOZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCOZF's competition here
FSHYF vs YZCAY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YZCAY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while YZCAY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas YZCAY's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YZCAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and YZCAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YZCAY's competition here
FSHYF vs YZCHF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YZCHF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while YZCHF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas YZCHF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YZCHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and YZCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YZCHF's competition here
FSHYF vs YACAF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YACAF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while YACAF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas YACAF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YACAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and YACAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YACAF's competition here
FSHYF vs IMYCF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IMYCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while IMYCF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas IMYCF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and IMYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMYCF's competition here
FSHYF vs HIIDQ Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HIIDQ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while HIIDQ trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas HIIDQ's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIIDQ's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to HIIDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check HIIDQ's competition here
FSHYF vs WHITF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WHITF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while WHITF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas WHITF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHITF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and WHITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WHITF's competition here
FSHYF vs ADOOY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADOOY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while ADOOY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ADOOY's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADOOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to ADOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check ADOOY's competition here
FSHYF vs PADEF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PADEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while PADEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PADEF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PADEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and PADEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PADEF's competition here
FSHYF vs PBMRF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PBMRF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while PBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PBMRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBMRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to PBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check PBMRF's competition here
FSHYF vs EXXAF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EXXAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while EXXAF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas EXXAF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXXAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and EXXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXXAF's competition here
FSHYF vs NHPEF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NHPEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while NHPEF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas NHPEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NHPEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and NHPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHPEF's competition here
FSHYF vs PBMRY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PBMRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while PBMRY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PBMRY's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBMRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and PBMRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBMRY's competition here
FSHYF vs PBATF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PBATF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while PBATF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PBATF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBATF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and PBATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBATF's competition here
FSHYF vs TBNGY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TBNGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while TBNGY trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas TBNGY's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and TBNGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBNGY's competition here
FSHYF vs ITAYY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ITAYY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while ITAYY trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ITAYY's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITAYY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and ITAYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITAYY's competition here
FSHYF vs PTIZF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PTIZF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while PTIZF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PTIZF's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTIZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to PTIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check PTIZF's competition here
FSHYF vs STMRF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STMRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while STMRF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas STMRF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STMRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to STMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check STMRF's competition here
FSHYF vs MOGLF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOGLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while MOGLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas MOGLF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOGLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and MOGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MOGLF's competition here
FSHYF vs CCOZY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCOZY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CCOZY trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CCOZY's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCOZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and CCOZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCOZY's competition here
FSHYF vs BRNE Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRNE has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while BRNE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BRNE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRNE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to BRNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check BRNE's competition here
FSHYF vs TNGRF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TNGRF has a market cap of 721.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while TNGRF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas TNGRF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNGRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to TNGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check TNGRF's competition here
FSHYF vs GRYRF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRYRF has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while GRYRF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas GRYRF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRYRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and GRYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRYRF's competition here
FSHYF vs CODQL Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CODQL has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CODQL trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CODQL's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODQL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and CODQL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CODQL's competition here
FSHYF vs CCARF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCARF has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CCARF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CCARF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCARF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to CCARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check CCARF's competition here
FSHYF vs BTURF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BTURF has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while BTURF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BTURF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTURF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and BTURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTURF's competition here
FSHYF vs SGQRF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SGQRF has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while SGQRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas SGQRF's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGQRF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to SGQRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check SGQRF's competition here
FSHYF vs TERCF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TERCF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while TERCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas TERCF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TERCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to TERCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check TERCF's competition here
FSHYF vs WRLC Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WRLC has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while WRLC trades at $455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas WRLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and WRLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRLC's competition here
FSHYF vs BNPJY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNPJY has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while BNPJY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BNPJY's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNPJY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to BNPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check BNPJY's competition here
FSHYF vs ARECW Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARECW has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while ARECW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ARECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARECW's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to ARECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check ARECW's competition here
FSHYF vs FSHRF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FSHRF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while FSHRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas FSHRF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSHRF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and FSHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSHRF's competition here
FSHYF vs GCLMF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GCLMF has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while GCLMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas GCLMF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCLMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to GCLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check GCLMF's competition here
FSHYF vs FBMCF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FBMCF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while FBMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas FBMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and FBMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBMCF's competition here
FSHYF vs CRSXF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRSXF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CRSXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CRSXF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRSXF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to CRSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check CRSXF's competition here
FSHYF vs WECFF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WECFF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while WECFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas WECFF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WECFF's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to WECFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check WECFF's competition here
FSHYF vs MOAEF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOAEF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while MOAEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas MOAEF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOAEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to MOAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check MOAEF's competition here
FSHYF vs APMCF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, APMCF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while APMCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas APMCF's P/E ratio is -24.99. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APMCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and APMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMCF's competition here
FSHYF vs CAFZF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CAFZF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CAFZF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CAFZF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to CAFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check CAFZF's competition here
FSHYF vs ROYE Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ROYE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while ROYE trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ROYE's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROYE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and ROYE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROYE's competition here
FSHYF vs ALGCF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALGCF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while ALGCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas ALGCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and ALGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALGCF's competition here
FSHYF vs AJLGF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AJLGF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while AJLGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas AJLGF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AJLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to AJLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check AJLGF's competition here
FSHYF vs MOAEY Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOAEY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while MOAEY trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas MOAEY's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOAEY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF is less volatile compared to MOAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSHYF.Check MOAEY's competition here
FSHYF vs PVMCF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PVMCF has a market cap of 393.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while PVMCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas PVMCF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PVMCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and PVMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PVMCF's competition here
FSHYF vs FDGMF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FDGMF has a market cap of 248K. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while FDGMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas FDGMF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and FDGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDGMF's competition here
FSHYF vs SHGP Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHGP has a market cap of 197.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while SHGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas SHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and SHGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGP's competition here
FSHYF vs AEXE Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AEXE has a market cap of 145.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while AEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas AEXE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEXE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and AEXE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEXE's competition here
FSHYF vs KALG Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KALG has a market cap of 18.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while KALG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas KALG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KALG's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and KALG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KALG's competition here
FSHYF vs CERX Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CERX has a market cap of 536. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while CERX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas CERX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CERX's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and CERX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CERX's competition here
FSHYF vs BGNRF Comparison July 2025
FSHYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSHYF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BGNRF has a market cap of 86. Regarding current trading prices, FSHYF is priced at $0.34, while BGNRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSHYF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.38, whereas BGNRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FSHYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGNRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSHYF and BGNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGNRF's competition here