Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. (FRX.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRX.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRX.TO | CA$11.94 | +4.28% | 328.1M | -19.26 | -CA$0.62 | N/A |
| BLU.TO | CA$19.48 | -0.10% | 2.5B | -20.29 | -CA$0.96 | N/A |
| MMED.NE | CA$14.90 | +9.48% | 1.1B | -4.50 | -CA$3.31 | N/A |
| DRUG.CN | CA$58.56 | -2.43% | 414.8M | -42.74 | -CA$1.37 | N/A |
| EPRX.TO | CA$7.10 | -1.39% | 262.6M | -6.16 | -CA$1.19 | N/A |
| CYBN.NE | CA$10.10 | +5.21% | 226.8M | -1.60 | -CA$6.15 | N/A |
| ONC.TO | CA$1.42 | +2.16% | 142.3M | -3.84 | -CA$0.37 | N/A |
| MSCL.TO | CA$0.60 | +3.45% | 103.9M | 2.27 | CA$0.26 | N/A |
| HBP.TO | CA$1.35 | +0.00% | 100.1M | -1.31 | -CA$1.03 | N/A |
| MDNA.TO | CA$1.09 | -2.68% | 75.6M | -6.87 | -CA$0.16 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRX.TO vs BLU.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, BLU.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while BLU.TO trades at CA$19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas BLU.TO's P/E ratio is -20.29. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to BLU.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to BLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check BLU.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs MMED.NE Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MMED.NE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MMED.NE trades at CA$14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MMED.NE's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MMED.NE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to MMED.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MMED.NE's competition here
FRX.TO vs DRUG.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, DRUG.CN has a market cap of 414.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while DRUG.CN trades at CA$58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas DRUG.CN's P/E ratio is -42.74. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to DRUG.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to DRUG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check DRUG.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs EPRX.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, EPRX.TO has a market cap of 262.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while EPRX.TO trades at CA$7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas EPRX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to EPRX.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to EPRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check EPRX.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs CYBN.NE Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, CYBN.NE has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while CYBN.NE trades at CA$10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas CYBN.NE's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to CYBN.NE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to CYBN.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check CYBN.NE's competition here
FRX.TO vs ONC.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, ONC.TO has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while ONC.TO trades at CA$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas ONC.TO's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to ONC.TO's ROE of -4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to ONC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check ONC.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs MSCL.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MSCL.TO has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MSCL.TO trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MSCL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MSCL.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to MSCL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MSCL.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs HBP.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, HBP.TO has a market cap of 100.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while HBP.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas HBP.TO's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to HBP.TO's ROE of +13.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to HBP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check HBP.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs MDNA.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MDNA.TO has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MDNA.TO trades at CA$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MDNA.TO's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MDNA.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to MDNA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MDNA.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs MSET.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MSET.CN has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MSET.CN trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MSET.CN's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MSET.CN's ROE of -3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRX.TO has daily volatility of 4.19 and MSET.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check MSET.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs ONCO.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, ONCO.CN has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while ONCO.CN trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas ONCO.CN's P/E ratio is -147.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to ONCO.CN's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to ONCO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check ONCO.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs SVA.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, SVA.TO has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while SVA.TO trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas SVA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to SVA.TO's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to SVA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check SVA.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs PMN.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, PMN.TO has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while PMN.TO trades at CA$6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas PMN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to PMN.TO's ROE of -5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to PMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check PMN.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs GLAB.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, GLAB.CN has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while GLAB.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas GLAB.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to GLAB.CN's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to GLAB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check GLAB.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs IGX.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, IGX.TO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while IGX.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas IGX.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to IGX.TO's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to IGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check IGX.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs PHRM.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, PHRM.CN has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while PHRM.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas PHRM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to PHRM.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to PHRM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check PHRM.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs DTC.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, DTC.CN has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while DTC.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas DTC.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to DTC.CN's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to DTC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check DTC.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs MBX.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MBX.TO has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MBX.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MBX.TO's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MBX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to MBX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MBX.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs RVX.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, RVX.TO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while RVX.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas RVX.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to RVX.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to RVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check RVX.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs AEZS.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, AEZS.TO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while AEZS.TO trades at CA$8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas AEZS.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to AEZS.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to AEZS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check AEZS.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs DOSE.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, DOSE.CN has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while DOSE.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas DOSE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to DOSE.CN's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to DOSE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check DOSE.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs PREV.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, PREV.CN has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while PREV.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas PREV.CN's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to PREV.CN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to PREV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check PREV.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs TELI.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, TELI.CN has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while TELI.CN trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas TELI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to TELI.CN's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to TELI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check TELI.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs BCT.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, BCT.TO has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while BCT.TO trades at CA$8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas BCT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to BCT.TO's ROE of -4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to BCT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check BCT.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs REUN.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, REUN.TO has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while REUN.TO trades at CA$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas REUN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to REUN.TO's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to REUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check REUN.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs MDMA.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MDMA.CN has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MDMA.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MDMA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MDMA.CN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to MDMA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MDMA.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs IMV.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, IMV.TO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while IMV.TO trades at CA$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas IMV.TO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to IMV.TO's ROE of -4.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to IMV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check IMV.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs BETR.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, BETR.CN has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while BETR.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas BETR.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to BETR.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to BETR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check BETR.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs BLAB.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, BLAB.CN has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while BLAB.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas BLAB.CN's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to BLAB.CN's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to BLAB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check BLAB.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs GLOW.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, GLOW.CN has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while GLOW.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas GLOW.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to GLOW.CN's ROE of +296.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to GLOW.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check GLOW.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs TBP.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, TBP.TO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while TBP.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas TBP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to TBP.TO's ROE of -4.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to TBP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check TBP.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs BIOV.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, BIOV.CN has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while BIOV.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas BIOV.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to BIOV.CN's ROE of +3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to BIOV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check BIOV.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs MCUR.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MCUR.CN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MCUR.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MCUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MCUR.CN's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to MCUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MCUR.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs COOL.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, COOL.CN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while COOL.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas COOL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to COOL.CN's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to COOL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check COOL.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs TRYP.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, TRYP.CN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while TRYP.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas TRYP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to TRYP.CN's ROE of +4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to TRYP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check TRYP.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs ASEP.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, ASEP.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while ASEP.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas ASEP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to ASEP.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to ASEP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check ASEP.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs CMND.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, CMND.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while CMND.CN trades at CA$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas CMND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to CMND.CN's ROE of +44.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to CMND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check CMND.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs GTTX.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, GTTX.CN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while GTTX.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas GTTX.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to GTTX.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to GTTX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check GTTX.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs APS.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, APS.TO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while APS.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas APS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to APS.TO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to APS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check APS.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs AWKN.NE Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, AWKN.NE has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while AWKN.NE trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas AWKN.NE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to AWKN.NE's ROE of -4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to AWKN.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check AWKN.NE's competition here
FRX.TO vs MYND.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MYND.CN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MYND.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MYND.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MYND.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to MYND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MYND.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs IPCI.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, IPCI.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while IPCI.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas IPCI.TO's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to IPCI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to IPCI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check IPCI.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs MOOD.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, MOOD.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while MOOD.CN trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas MOOD.CN's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to MOOD.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to MOOD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check MOOD.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs APLI.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, APLI.TO has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while APLI.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas APLI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to APLI.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to APLI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check APLI.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs AGN.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, AGN.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while AGN.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas AGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to AGN.CN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to AGN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check AGN.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs BRAX.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, BRAX.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while BRAX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas BRAX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to BRAX.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to BRAX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check BRAX.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs ENBI.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, ENBI.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while ENBI.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas ENBI.CN's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to ENBI.CN's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to ENBI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check ENBI.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs HAVN.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, HAVN.CN has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while HAVN.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas HAVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to HAVN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to HAVN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check HAVN.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs LEXT.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, LEXT.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while LEXT.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas LEXT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to LEXT.CN's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to LEXT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check LEXT.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs CHGX.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, CHGX.CN has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while CHGX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas CHGX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to CHGX.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to CHGX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check CHGX.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs CURE.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, CURE.CN has a market cap of 408K. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while CURE.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas CURE.CN's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to CURE.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to CURE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check CURE.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs NIRV.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, NIRV.CN has a market cap of 385.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while NIRV.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas NIRV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to NIRV.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is less volatile compared to NIRV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check NIRV.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs ABRT.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, ABRT.CN has a market cap of 372.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while ABRT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas ABRT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to ABRT.CN's ROE of +16.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to ABRT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check ABRT.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs WBIO.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, WBIO.CN has a market cap of 324.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while WBIO.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas WBIO.CN's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to WBIO.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to WBIO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check WBIO.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs NSHS.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, NSHS.CN has a market cap of 308.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while NSHS.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas NSHS.CN's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to NSHS.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to NSHS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check NSHS.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs NOVA.CN Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, NOVA.CN has a market cap of 148.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while NOVA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas NOVA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to NOVA.CN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to NOVA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check NOVA.CN's competition here
FRX.TO vs TRIL.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, TRIL.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while TRIL.TO trades at CA$23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas TRIL.TO's P/E ratio is -34.06. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to TRIL.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to TRIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check TRIL.TO's competition here
FRX.TO vs IN.TO Comparison August 2025
FRX.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRX.TO stands at 328.1M. In comparison, IN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRX.TO is priced at CA$11.94, while IN.TO trades at CA$4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRX.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.26, whereas IN.TO's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, FRX.TO's ROE is +6.15%, compared to IN.TO's ROE of -175.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRX.TO is more volatile compared to IN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRX.TO.Check IN.TO's competition here