Foris AG
Foris AG (FRS.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRS.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRS.DE | €3.22 | -3.01% | 14.8M | 64.40 | €0.05 | +4.66% |
| 3V64.DE | €259.90 | +0.08% | 502.8B | 27.83 | €9.27 | +0.83% |
| M4I.DE | €428.10 | -0.29% | 378.2B | 29.69 | €14.39 | +0.64% |
| AEC1.DE | €258.80 | -0.50% | 180B | 19.67 | €13.33 | +1.08% |
| 2PP.F | €38.72 | -1.11% | 35.7B | 8.22 | €4.71 | +0.62% |
| 2PP.DE | €38.99 | -0.33% | 35.4B | 8.16 | €4.71 | +0.63% |
| SFE.DE | €58.88 | -0.14% | 21.3B | 7.29 | €8.08 | +1.76% |
| KRTA.F | €0.75 | +2.05% | 1.9B | 9.44 | €0.08 | +4.64% |
| GLJ.DE | €12.62 | +0.48% | 567.2M | 9.95 | €1.29 | +3.12% |
| HYQ.DE | €75.70 | +6.77% | 484.7M | 18.71 | €3.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRS.DE vs 3V64.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, 3V64.DE has a market cap of 502.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while 3V64.DE trades at €259.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas 3V64.DE's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3V64.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to 3V64.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check 3V64.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs M4I.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, M4I.DE has a market cap of 378.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while M4I.DE trades at €428.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas M4I.DE's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to M4I.DE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to M4I.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check M4I.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs AEC1.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, AEC1.DE has a market cap of 180B. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while AEC1.DE trades at €258.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas AEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AEC1.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to AEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check AEC1.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs 2PP.F Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, 2PP.F has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while 2PP.F trades at €38.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas 2PP.F's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2PP.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to 2PP.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check 2PP.F's competition here
FRS.DE vs 2PP.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, 2PP.DE has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while 2PP.DE trades at €38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas 2PP.DE's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2PP.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to 2PP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check 2PP.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs SFE.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, SFE.DE has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while SFE.DE trades at €58.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas SFE.DE's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SFE.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to SFE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check SFE.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs KRTA.F Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, KRTA.F has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while KRTA.F trades at €0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas KRTA.F's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRTA.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE and KRTA.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRTA.F's competition here
FRS.DE vs GLJ.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, GLJ.DE has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while GLJ.DE trades at €12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas GLJ.DE's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GLJ.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to GLJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check GLJ.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs HYQ.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, HYQ.DE has a market cap of 484.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while HYQ.DE trades at €75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas HYQ.DE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HYQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to HYQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check HYQ.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs FRU.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, FRU.DE has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while FRU.DE trades at €6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas FRU.DE's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRU.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to FRU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check FRU.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs ALG.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ALG.DE has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while ALG.DE trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas ALG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALG.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to ALG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check ALG.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs EBE.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, EBE.DE has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while EBE.DE trades at €9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas EBE.DE's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EBE.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to EBE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check EBE.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs TUF.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TUF.DE has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while TUF.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas TUF.DE's P/E ratio is -24.20. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TUF.DE's ROE of -6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE and TUF.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUF.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs TUF.F Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, TUF.F has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while TUF.F trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas TUF.F's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TUF.F's ROE of -6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE and TUF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUF.F's competition here
FRS.DE vs EBEN.HM Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, EBEN.HM has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while EBEN.HM trades at €1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas EBEN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EBEN.HM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to EBEN.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check EBEN.HM's competition here
FRS.DE vs FF24.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, FF24.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while FF24.DE trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas FF24.DE's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FF24.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRS.DE has daily volatility of 0.00 and FF24.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check FF24.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs CSQ.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CSQ.DE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while CSQ.DE trades at €2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas CSQ.DE's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSQ.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE and CSQ.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSQ.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs FF24.F Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, FF24.F has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while FF24.F trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas FF24.F's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FF24.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to FF24.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check FF24.F's competition here
FRS.DE vs ENGL.DE Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ENGL.DE has a market cap of 493.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while ENGL.DE trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas ENGL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENGL.DE's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE and ENGL.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGL.DE's competition here
FRS.DE vs ENGL.F Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, ENGL.F has a market cap of 219.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while ENGL.F trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas ENGL.F's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENGL.F's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE is less volatile compared to ENGL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRS.DE.Check ENGL.F's competition here
FRS.DE vs CSQ.F Comparison April 2026
FRS.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRS.DE stands at 14.8M. In comparison, CSQ.F has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRS.DE is priced at €3.22, while CSQ.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 64.40, whereas CSQ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRS.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSQ.F's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRS.DE and CSQ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSQ.F's competition here