Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. (FRRSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRRSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRRSF | $6.05 | +0.83% | 1.2B | -605.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SHECY | $14.62 | -1.02% | 55.5B | 16.04 | $0.91 | +1.53% |
| SHECF | $29.36 | -7.08% | 55B | 15.96 | $1.84 | +2.44% |
| BFFAF | $51.50 | -0.76% | 46B | 52.55 | $0.98 | +4.96% |
| BASFY | $12.51 | -1.34% | 44.4B | 51.85 | $0.24 | +5.06% |
| SLMNP | $890.00 | +0.23% | 26.3B | 978.02 | $0.91 | +6.74% |
| TYNPF | $40.04 | +0.91% | 17.3B | 25.67 | $1.56 | +0.87% |
| AHKSF | $6.97 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 10.56 | $0.66 | +3.69% |
| AHKSY | $13.79 | -0.36% | 9.4B | 10.39 | $1.32 | N/A |
| GNENF | $3.59 | +0.52% | 9.2B | -25.63 | -$0.14 | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
FRRSF vs SHECY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHECY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHECY's competition here
FRRSF vs SHECF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHECF trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHECF's competition here
FRRSF vs BFFAF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BFFAF trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BFFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BFFAF's competition here
FRRSF vs BASFY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BASFY trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BASFY's competition here
FRRSF vs SLMNP Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SLMNP trades at $890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 978.02. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SLMNP's competition here
FRRSF vs TYNPF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TYNPF trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TYNPF's competition here
FRRSF vs AHKSF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AHKSF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AHKSF's competition here
FRRSF vs AHKSY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AHKSY trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AHKSY's competition here
FRRSF vs GNENF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while GNENF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -25.63. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check GNENF's competition here
FRRSF vs MTLHY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MTLHY trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MTLHY's competition here
FRRSF vs MTLHF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MTLHF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MTLHF's competition here
FRRSF vs PECGF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PECGF's competition here
FRRSF vs IMCDY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while IMCDY trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check IMCDY's competition here
FRRSF vs GNENY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while GNENY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -26.79. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to GNENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check GNENY's competition here
FRRSF vs PTGCF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to PTGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PTGCF's competition here
FRRSF vs TOSCF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TOSCF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TOSCF's competition here
FRRSF vs NNCHY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NNCHY trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NNCHY's competition here
FRRSF vs BCHMF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BCHMF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BCHMF's competition here
FRRSF vs SOMMF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SOMMF's competition here
FRRSF vs SHWDY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHWDY trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHWDY's competition here
FRRSF vs SOMMY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SOMMY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SOMMY's competition here
FRRSF vs SHWDF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHWDF's competition here
FRRSF vs KURRY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KURRY trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KURRY's competition here
FRRSF vs KURRF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KURRF's competition here
FRRSF vs SVYSF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SVYSF trades at $33.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SVYSF's competition here
FRRSF vs KOYJF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KOYJF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KOYJF's competition here
FRRSF vs SLVYY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SLVYY trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SLVYY's competition here
FRRSF vs INDOY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to INDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check INDOY's competition here
FRRSF vs KPLUY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KPLUY trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 756.80. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KPLUY's competition here
FRRSF vs PCHUY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PCHUY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to PCHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PCHUY's competition here
FRRSF vs RBTEF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while RBTEF trades at $922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check RBTEF's competition here
FRRSF vs DENKF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check DENKF's competition here
FRRSF vs NPKYY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NPKYY's competition here
FRRSF vs MXCHF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MXCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MXCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MXCHF's competition here
FRRSF vs NPKYF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NPKYF's competition here
FRRSF vs VYTPF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to VYTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check VYTPF's competition here
FRRSF vs LNZNF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while LNZNF trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check LNZNF's competition here
FRRSF vs TOAGF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TOAGF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TOAGF's competition here
FRRSF vs BRGAY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BRGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BRGAY's competition here
FRRSF vs MXCHY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 710M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MXCHY trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MXCHY's competition here
FRRSF vs SGLFF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 507.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SGLFF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SGLFF's competition here
FRRSF vs TYGIF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TYGIF's competition here
FRRSF vs CDSAF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to CDSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CDSAF's competition here
FRRSF vs NNXPF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 349.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NNXPF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -51.25. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NNXPF's competition here
FRRSF vs CRDE Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRRSF has daily volatility of 1.67 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
FRRSF vs CNSJF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to CNSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CNSJF's competition here
FRRSF vs BNOW Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BNOW's competition here
FRRSF vs HZRGF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while HZRGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check HZRGF's competition here
FRRSF vs BLGO Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BLGO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BLGO's competition here
FRRSF vs BSWGF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BSWGF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -11.29. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BSWGF's competition here
FRRSF vs FGPHF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FGPHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FGPHF's competition here
FRRSF vs PLYR Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PLYR's competition here
FRRSF vs CHHYF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CHHYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CHHYF's competition here
FRRSF vs FHELF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FHELF's competition here
FRRSF vs EESE Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check EESE's competition here
FRRSF vs AGTT Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AGTT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AGTT's competition here
FRRSF vs OPCGF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 439.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to OPCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check OPCGF's competition here
FRRSF vs CHCC Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to CHCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CHCC's competition here
FRRSF vs AFPW Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AFPW's competition here
FRRSF vs FLRE Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to FLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FLRE's competition here
FRRSF vs LBTI Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to LBTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check LBTI's competition here
FRRSF vs VULC Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check VULC's competition here
FRRSF vs MKDTY Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MKDTY's competition here
FRRSF vs NUEC Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NUEC's competition here
FRRSF vs RKTE Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check RKTE's competition here
FRRSF vs ADKIL Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check ADKIL's competition here
FRRSF vs BMRK Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BMRK's competition here
FRRSF vs ADKCF Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to ADKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check ADKCF's competition here
FRRSF vs FIND Comparison July 2025
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to FIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FIND's competition here