Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. (FRRSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRRSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRRSF | $6.05 | +0.83% | 1.2B | -605.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SHECF | $36.83 | +0.00% | 69.9B | 22.08 | $1.69 | +1.90% |
| SHECY | $18.39 | +0.00% | 69.9B | 22.20 | $0.84 | +1.50% |
| BASFY | $14.33 | +0.00% | 51.5B | 144.30 | $0.10 | +4.37% |
| BFFAF | $57.60 | +0.00% | 51.4B | 140.49 | $0.41 | +4.41% |
| SLMNP | $870.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | 956.04 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| GNENF | $8.10 | +1.38% | 21.1B | -77.50 | -$0.10 | +0.27% |
| TYNPF | $37.16 | +0.00% | 16.7B | 24.63 | $1.57 | +0.97% |
| AHKSY | $23.04 | +0.00% | 15.2B | 16.62 | $1.35 | +2.11% |
| AHKSF | $10.64 | -8.63% | 14.5B | 15.65 | $0.68 | +2.51% |
Stock Comparison
FRRSF vs SHECF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHECF trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHECF's competition here
FRRSF vs SHECY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHECY trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHECY's competition here
FRRSF vs BASFY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BASFY trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 144.30. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BASFY's competition here
FRRSF vs BFFAF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BFFAF trades at $57.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 140.49. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BFFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BFFAF's competition here
FRRSF vs SLMNP Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SLMNP trades at $870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 956.04. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SLMNP's competition here
FRRSF vs GNENF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while GNENF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -77.50. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check GNENF's competition here
FRRSF vs TYNPF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TYNPF trades at $37.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TYNPF's competition here
FRRSF vs AHKSY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AHKSY trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AHKSY's competition here
FRRSF vs AHKSF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AHKSF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AHKSF's competition here
FRRSF vs SHWDY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHWDY trades at $69.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 69.57. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHWDY's competition here
FRRSF vs GNENY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while GNENY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to GNENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check GNENY's competition here
FRRSF vs SHWDF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SHWDF trades at $69.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SHWDF's competition here
FRRSF vs MTLHF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MTLHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MTLHF's competition here
FRRSF vs MTLHY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MTLHY trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MTLHY's competition here
FRRSF vs PECGF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PECGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PECGF's competition here
FRRSF vs NNCHY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NNCHY trades at $45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NNCHY's competition here
FRRSF vs SOMMY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SOMMY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SOMMY's competition here
FRRSF vs IMCDY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while IMCDY trades at $49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check IMCDY's competition here
FRRSF vs TOSCF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TOSCF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TOSCF's competition here
FRRSF vs SOMMF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SOMMF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SOMMF's competition here
FRRSF vs BCHMF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BCHMF trades at $60.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BCHMF's competition here
FRRSF vs INDOY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while INDOY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to INDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check INDOY's competition here
FRRSF vs PCHUY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PCHUY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to PCHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PCHUY's competition here
FRRSF vs KURRY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KURRY trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 75.16. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KURRY's competition here
FRRSF vs SVYSF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SVYSF trades at $32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SVYSF's competition here
FRRSF vs KOYJF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KOYJF trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KOYJF's competition here
FRRSF vs SLVYY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SLVYY trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SLVYY's competition here
FRRSF vs KURRF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KURRF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 67.83. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KURRF's competition here
FRRSF vs KPLUY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while KPLUY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check KPLUY's competition here
FRRSF vs PTGCF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PTGCF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to PTGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PTGCF's competition here
FRRSF vs MXCHF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MXCHF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MXCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MXCHF's competition here
FRRSF vs RBTEF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while RBTEF trades at $1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check RBTEF's competition here
FRRSF vs DENKF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while DENKF trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is -20.97. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check DENKF's competition here
FRRSF vs NPKYY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NPKYY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NPKYY's competition here
FRRSF vs NPKYF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NPKYF's competition here
FRRSF vs VYTPF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to VYTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check VYTPF's competition here
FRRSF vs LNZNF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while LNZNF trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check LNZNF's competition here
FRRSF vs MXCHY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MXCHY trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MXCHY's competition here
FRRSF vs TOAGF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TOAGF trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TOAGF's competition here
FRRSF vs BRGAY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BRGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BRGAY's competition here
FRRSF vs SGLFF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while SGLFF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check SGLFF's competition here
FRRSF vs CDSAF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to CDSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CDSAF's competition here
FRRSF vs NNXPF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NNXPF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -31.20. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NNXPF's competition here
FRRSF vs CRDE Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRRSF has daily volatility of 1.67 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
FRRSF vs TYGIF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while TYGIF trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check TYGIF's competition here
FRRSF vs CNSJF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to CNSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CNSJF's competition here
FRRSF vs HZRGF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while HZRGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check HZRGF's competition here
FRRSF vs BNOW Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BNOW's competition here
FRRSF vs BLGO Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BLGO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BLGO's competition here
FRRSF vs FGPHF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FGPHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FGPHF's competition here
FRRSF vs BSWGF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BSWGF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -7.82. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BSWGF's competition here
FRRSF vs PLYR Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check PLYR's competition here
FRRSF vs CHHYF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CHHYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CHHYF's competition here
FRRSF vs FHELF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FHELF's competition here
FRRSF vs EESE Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while EESE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check EESE's competition here
FRRSF vs AGTT Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AGTT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AGTT's competition here
FRRSF vs OPCGF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 420.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to OPCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check OPCGF's competition here
FRRSF vs CHCC Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to CHCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check CHCC's competition here
FRRSF vs AFPW Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check AFPW's competition here
FRRSF vs FLRE Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to FLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FLRE's competition here
FRRSF vs LBTI Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTI's ROE of -30.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to LBTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check LBTI's competition here
FRRSF vs VULC Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check VULC's competition here
FRRSF vs NUEC Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check NUEC's competition here
FRRSF vs MKDTY Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check MKDTY's competition here
FRRSF vs RKTE Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 51. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check RKTE's competition here
FRRSF vs BMRK Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to BMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check BMRK's competition here
FRRSF vs ADKIL Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check ADKIL's competition here
FRRSF vs ADKCF Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to ADKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check ADKCF's competition here
FRRSF vs FIND Comparison February 2026
FRRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRRSF stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRRSF is priced at $6.05, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -605.00, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRRSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRRSF is more volatile compared to FIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRRSF.Check FIND's competition here