Future plc

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while IDWM trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check IDWM's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, RLXXF has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while RLXXF trades at $47.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas RLXXF's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RLXXF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to RLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check RLXXF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while IFJPY trades at $24.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 162.73. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check IFJPY's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while IFPJF trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 174.46. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check IFPJF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while PSORF trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to PSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check PSORF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while SBSNY trades at $40.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to SBSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check SBSNY's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while SBBTF trades at $32.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to SBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check SBBTF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check SBSNF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while KDKWF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to KDKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check KDKWF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to SHXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check SHXWF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while CNGO trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check CNGO's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 569.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while RZSMF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check RZSMF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to MDDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check MDDCF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to GPOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check GPOPF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while STRYF trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check STRYF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to TOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check TOCOF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while GWOX trades at $400.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to GWOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check GWOX's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check PCDAF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while YLWDF trades at $8.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to YLWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check YLWDF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while CMTX trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check CMTX's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check SMWPY's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while HKGEF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check HKGEF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while STAOF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to STAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check STAOF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while GLMFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to GLMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check GLMFF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while SADL trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check SADL's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while XLMDF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to XLMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check XLMDF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while DTRL trades at $291.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to DTRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check DTRL's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check FPNUF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while FMPR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check FMPR's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while LEBGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to LEBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check LEBGF's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 44.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while PEDH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check PEDH's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while PDOS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check PDOS's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 29.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while ACNI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check ACNI's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while BKMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to BKMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check BKMP's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while DIGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to DIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check DIGI's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to HRDIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check HRDIL's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while HRDI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to HRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check HRDI's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while MAHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to MAHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check MAHI's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while SALN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check SALN's competition here

FRNWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRNWF stands at 1B. In comparison, YLWWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRNWF is priced at $9.93, while YLWWF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas YLWWF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, FRNWF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YLWWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRNWF is more volatile compared to YLWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRNWF.Check YLWWF's competition here